In vitro shoot proliferation competence of apple rootstocks M. 9 and M. 26 on different carbon sources

Pakistan Journal of Botany

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 1781-1795

  Yaseen, Mehwish ^a   Ahmed, Touqeer ^a   Abbasi, Nadeem Akhtar ^a   Hafiz, Ishfaq Ahmed ^a  

^a PMAS ARID AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 70349664514     PISSN: 05563321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ahmad, T., N.A. Abbasi, I.A. Hafiz and A. Ali. 2007. Comparison of sucrose and sorbitol as main carbon energy source in morphogenesis of peach rootstock GF-677. Pak. J. Bot., 39(4): 1264-1275.
2. Atkinson, C.J. and M.A. Else. 2003. Enhancing harvest index in temperate fruit tree crops through the use of dwarfing rootstocks. International workshop on Cocoa breeding for improved production systems. Hort. Res. Int. East Malling, United Kingdom.
3. Bianco, L.R. and M. Rieger. 2002a. Portioning of sorbitol and sucrose catabolism within peach fruit. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127(1): 115-121.
4. Bianco, L.R. and M. Rieger. 2002b. Roles of sorbitol and sucrose in growth and respiration of Encore peaches at the three developmental stages. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 127(2): 297-302.
5. Blance, G., N.M. Ferriere, C. Teisson, L. Lardet and M.P. Carron. 1999. Effect of carbohydrate addition on the induction of somatic embryogenesis in Hevea brasiliensis. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 59: 103-112.
6. Chen, J. and M. Ziv. 2003. Carbohydrates, metabolic and osmotic changes in scaled up cultivars of Narcissus leaves. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant, 39: 645-650.
7. Chen, Y., S. Lin, S. Dujuid, P. Dribnenki and E. Kenasehuk. 2003. Effect of sucrose concentration on elongation of shoots from Flax anther cultures. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 72: 181-183.
8. Coffin, R., C.D. Taper and C. Chong. 1976. Sorbitol and sucrose as carbon source for callus cultures of some species of the Rosaceae. Can. J. Bot., 54: 547-551.
9. De Nato, V.B.P. and W.C. Otoni. 2003. Carbon sources and their osmotic potential in plant tissue culture: does it matter? Scient. Hort., 97: 193-202.
10. Debnath, S. 2005. Effect of carbon source concentration on development of Lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea L.) shoots cultivated In vitro from nodal explants. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant, 41: 145-150.
11. Druart, P. 1995. C-source and growth response of Prunus glandulosa. 'Sinensis' and Malus pumila Mill. M 26 and M 9 clone 29 during in vitro propagation. Bulletin Recherches Agronomiques deGembloux, 30(1/2): 29-37.
12. Faria, R.T.D., F.N. Rodrigues, L.V.R. Oliveira and C. Muller. 2004. In vitro Dendrobium nobile plant growth and rooting in different sucrose concentrations. Hort. Brassileira, 22(4): 780-783.
13. George, E.F. 1993. Somatic embryogenesis: Cell biological aspects. Acta Bot. Neerl., 43: 1-14.
14. Gurel, S. and Y. Gulsen. 1998. The effect of different carbon sources, agar and pH levels on In vitro shoot production in almond (Amygdalus communis L.). Tr. J. Bot., 22: 363-373.
15. 4 on root tip drive shoots and subsequent bulblet formation in garlic. J. Asian Plant Sci., 2(12): 903-908.
16. Hilae, A. and S. Te-Chato. 2005. Effect of carbon sources and strength of MS medium on germination of somatic embryos of oil palm (Elaeis quineesis Jacq.). Songklanakavin. J. Sci. Technol., 27(3): 629-635.
17. Jain, N. and S.B. Babbar. 2003. Effect of carbon source on the shoot proliferation potential of epicotyle explant of Syzygium cuminii. Biologia Plantarum, 47(1): 133-136.
18. Kadota, M., K. Imizu and T. Hiranu. 2001. Double phase In vitro culture using sorbitol increases shoot proliferation and reduces hyperhydricity in Japanese pear. Scient. Hort., 89: 207-215.
19. Karami, O., A. Deljou, M. Esna-Ashavi and P. Ostad-Ahmadi. 2006. Effect of sucrose concentration on somatic embryogenesis in Carnation (Dianthus carophyllus L.). Scient. Hort., 110: 340-344.
20. Khuri, S. and J. Moorby. 1995. Investigation into the role of sucrose in potato cv. Estima microtuber production in vitro. Ann. Bot., 75: 295-303.
21. Lipavska, H and H. Konradova. 2004. Invited Review: Somatic embryogenesis in conifers: The role of carbohydrate metabolism. In vitro Cell Dev. Biol. plant, 40: 23-30.
22. Marino, G., G. Bertazza, E. Magnanini and A.D. Altan. 1993. Competitive effect of sorbitol and sucrose as main carbon energy sources in Micropropagation of apricot. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 34: 235-244.
23. Moing, A., F. Carbonne, M.H. Rashad and G. Jean-Pierre. 1992. Carbon fluxes in mature peach leaves. Plant Physiol., 100: 1878-1884.
24. Morini, S., R. Sciutti and T. Fortuna. 1992. In vitro growth responses of Prunus cerasifera shoots as influenced by light, dark cycle and sucrose concentration. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 28: 245-248.
25. Rolland, F., E. Baena-Gonzalez and J. Sheen. 2006. Sugar sensing and signaling in plants. Conserved and novel mechanism. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol., 57: 675-709.
26. Romano, A., C. Noronha and M.A. Martins. 1995. Role of carbohydrates in micropropagation of cork oak. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 40(2): 159-167.
27. Sairam, R.V., G. Franklin, R. Hassel, B. Smith, K. Meeker, N. Kashikar, M. Parani, D.A. Abed, S. Ismail, K. Berry and S.L. Goldman. 2003. A study on the effect of genotypes, plant growth regulators and sugars in promoting plant regeneration via organogenesis from soybean cotyledonary nodal callus. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult., 75: 79-85.
28. Sotiropoulos, T.E., A.N. Molassiotis, G.I. Mouhtaridou, I. Papadakis, K.N. Dimassi, I.N. Therios and G. Diamantidis. 2006. Sucrose and sorbitol effects on shoot growth and proliferation in vitro, nutritional status and peroxidase and catalaze isoenzymes of M 9 and MM106 Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) rootstocks. Europ. J. Hort. Sci., 71(3): 114-119.
29. nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., USA: 633p.
30. Stoop, J.M.H. and D.M. Pharr. 1993. Effect of different carbon sources on relative growth rate, internal carbohydrates, and Mannitol 1-Oxidoreductaseactivity in celery suspension cultures. Plant Physiol., 103: 1001-1008.
31. Swedlund, B. and R.D. Locy. 1993. Sorbitol as the primary carbon source for the growth of embryogenic callus of maize. Plant Physiol., 103: 1339-1346.
32. Thorpe, T.A. 1980. Organogenesis In vitro; Structural, Physiological and biochemical aspects. In: International Review of Cytology. Perspectives in plant cell and tissue culture. (Ed.): I.K. Vasil, Acad. Press, New York: p.71-111.
33. Tornero, O.P., J. Egea, A. Vanoostende and L. Burgos. 2000. Assessment of factors affecting adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro cultured leaves of apricot. J. Plant Sci., 158: 61-70.
34. Vitova, L., E. Stodulkova, A. Bartonickova and H. Lipavska. 2002. Mannitol utilization by Celery (Apium graveolens) plants grown under different conditions In vitro. Plant Sci., 163: 907-916.
35. Weber, L., L. Borisjuk and U. Wobus. 1997. Sugar import and metabolism during seed development. Plant Sci., 2: 169-174.
36. Welander, M., N.T. Welandera and A.S. Brackman. 1989. Regulation of In vitro shoot multiplication in Syringa, Alnus and Malus by different carbon sources. J. Hort. Sci., 64: 361-366.
37. Wilson, W. 1972. Control of crop processes. In: Crop processes in controlled environment. (Eds.): A.R. Rees, K.E. Cockshull, D.W. Hand and R.G. Hurd. Acad. Press, London: p. 7-30.
38. Yuri, A. 1988. Anwendung von polyethylene glycol und mannitol bei studien zum wasserstrez. Gartenbauwissenshaft, 53: 270-273.