Pregnancy outcome and mode of delivery after a previous operative vaginal delivery

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 757-763

  Melamed, Nir ^a,b   Ben Haroush, Avi ^a,b   Chen, Rony ^a,b   Pardo, Joseph ^a,b   Hod, Moshe ^a,b   Yogev, Yariv ^a,b  

^a Helen Schneider Hospital for Women   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH INJURY; BRAIN HEMATOMA; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CESAREAN SECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FACIAL NERVE INJURY; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR STAGE 3; LACERATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SKULL FRACTURE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT INDICATION; VACUUM EXTRACTION; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CESAREAN SECTION, REPEAT; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; RISK FACTORS; VACUUM EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349655531     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b6f611     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Simonson C, Barlow P, Dehennin N, Sphel M, Toppet V, Murillo D, et al. Neonatal complications of vacuum-assisted delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:626-633
2. Doumouchtsis SK, Arulkumaran S. Head injuries after instrumental vaginal deliveries. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006;18: 129-134
3. Kadar N, Romero R. Prognosis for future childbearing after midcavity instrumental deliveries in primigravidas. Obstet Gynecol 1983;62:166-170
4. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ 2004;328:311.
5. Dystocia and augmentation of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 49. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1445-1454
6. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin 17. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000.
7. Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Lie RT. The interval between pregnancies and the risk of preeclampsia. N Engl J Med 2002;346: 33-38
8. Zhu BP, Rolfs RT, Nangle BE, Horan JM. Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 1999;340:589-594
9. Liu EH, Sia AT. Rates of caesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery in nulliparous women after low concentration epidural infusions or opioid analgesia: systematic review. BMJ 2004;328:1410.
10. Alexander JM, Sharma SK, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Epidural analgesia lengthens the Friedman active phase of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2002;100:46-50.
11. Ramin SM, Gambling DR, Lucas MJ, Sharma SK, Sidawi JE, Leveno KJ. Randomized trial of epidural versus intravenous analgesia during labor. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86: 783-789
12. Senecal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD; Pushing Early Or Pushing Late with Epidural study group. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2005;105:763-772
13. Piper JM, Bolling DR, Newton ER. The second stage of labor: factors influencing duration. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165: 976-979
14. Newton ER, Schroeder BC, Knape KG, Bennett BL. Epidural analgesia and uterine function. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85: 749-755
15. Zhang J, Klebanoff MA, DerSimonian R. Epidural analgesia in association with duration of labor and mode of delivery: a quantitative review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:970-977
16. Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JF, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1998;280:2105-2110
17. Gardberg M, Stenwall O, Laakkonen E. Recurrent persistent occipito-posterior position in subsequent deliveries. BJOG 2004;111:170-171
18. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;106:227-232