Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 106, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 227-232

  Jolly, John ^a   Walker, James ^a   Bhabra, Kalvinder ^b  

^a ST JAMES S UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b HUDDERSFIELD ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDBIRTH; DELIVERY; FEAR; FEMALE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSTETRIC CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EXTRACTION, OBSTETRICAL; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEAR; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, FEMALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTIVE HISTORY;

EID: 0033021541     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: 14710528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08235.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Savage W. A Savage Enquiry: Who Controls Childbirth? London : Virago Press, 1986.
2. Drife J. Maternity services: the Audit Commission reports [editorial]. BMJ 1997; 314: 884.
3. Savage W, Francome C. British caesarean section rates: have we reached a plateau Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 493–496.
4. Treffers PE, Pel M. The rising for caesarean birth [editorial]. BMJ 1993; 307: 1017.
5. Lilford RJ, Van Coeverden HA, Moore PJ, Bingham P. The relative risks of caesarean section (intrapartum and elective) and vaginal delivery: a detailed analysis to exclude the effects of medical disorders and other acute pre-existing psychosocial disturbances. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 97: 883–892.
6. Zadeb MS, Themiault GD, Logrillo VM. Frequency, spacing and out come of pregnancies subscquent to primary caesarean childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 150: 205–212.
7. Garel M, Lelong N, Marchand A, Kaminski M. Psychosocial consequences of caesarean childbirth: a four-year follow-up study. Early Hum Dev 1990; 21: 105–114.
8. Hurry DJ, Larsen B, Charles D. Effects of postcaesaren section febrile morbidity on subsequent fertility. Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 64: 256–260.
9. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after caesarean: a meta-analysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol 1991; 77: 465–470.
10. Notzon FC, Placek PJ, Taffel SM. Comparisons of national caesarcan section rates. New Engl J Med 1987; 316: 386–389.
11. Patterson CM, Saunders NJ. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region. BMJ 1991; 303: 818–821.
12. Johanson R, Wilkinson P, Basfible A, Ryan S, Murphy H, O'Brien S. Health after childbirth: a comparison of normal and assisted vaginal delivery. Midwifery 1993; 9: 161–168.
13. Hemminki E, Graubard BI, Hoffman HJ, Mosher WD, Fetterly K. Caesarean section and subsequent fertility: results from the 1982 national survey of family growth. Fertil Sreril 1985; 43: 520–528.
14. Garel M, Lelong N, Kaminski M. Psychological consequences of caesarean childbirth in primiparas. J Psychosomuric 0bsrt.r Gynciecol 1987; 6: 197–209.
15. Bradley CF, Ross SE, Wamyca J. A prospective study of mothers' attitudes and feelings following caesarean and vaginal births. Birth 1983; 10: 79–83.
16. Erb L, Hill G, Houston D. A survey of parents' attitudes towards their caesarean births in Manitoba Hospitals. Birth 1983; 10: 85–91.
17. Affonso DD, Stichler JF. Exploratory study of women's reactions to having a caesarean birth. Birth Family J 1978; 5: 88–94.
18. Marut J, Mercer R. Comparison of primiparas perception of vaginal and caesarean births. Nurs Res 1979; 28: 260–266.
19. Cain RL, Pederson FA, Zaslow MJ, Krama E. Effects of the fathers presence or absence during a caesarean delivery. Birth 1984; 11: 10–15.
20. Mutryn CS. Psychosocial impact of caesarean section on the family: a literature review. Soc Sci Med 1993; 37: 1271–1281.
21. Handa VL, Hams TA, Ostergard DR. Protecting the pelvic floor: obstetric management to prevent incontinence and pelvic organ pro lapse [review]. Obstet Gynecol 1996; 88: 470–478.
22. Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994; 308: 887–891.
23. Wilkinson C, Mcllwaine G, Boulton-Jones C. Cole S. Is a rising caesarean section rate inevitable Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 105: 45–52.
24. Fisk N. The benefits of having a nice, clean cut. The Times July 15, 1997.
25. Chamberlain G. What is the correct caesarean section rate Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 100: 403–404.