An application of modified Smeed, adapted Andreassen and artificial neural network accident models to three metropolitan cities of Turkey

Scientific Research and Essays

Volumn 4, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 906-913

  Akgüngör, Ali Payidar ^a   Doǧan, Erdem ^a  

^a KIRIKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Accident prediction model; Artificial neural network (ANN); The Andreassen model; The Smeed model; Traffic accident deaths; Turkey

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349639424     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19922248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abdelwahab HT, Abdel-Aty MA (2001). Development of artificial neural network models to predict driver injury severity in traffic accident at signalized intersection. Transp. Res. Rec. 1746: 6-13.
2. Akgungor AP, Dogan E (2009) An artificial intelligent approach to traffic accident estimation: Model development and application, Transport 24(2): 135-142.
3. Akgungor AP, Dogan E (2008a). Application of Smeed and Andreassen accident models for Turkey: various scenario analyses. J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ. 23(4): 821-827.
4. Akgungor AP, Dogan E (2008b). Estimating road accidents of Turkey based on regression analysis and artificial neural network approach, Advances in Transportation Studies An Int. J. Section A 16: 11-22.
5. Andreassen D (1985). Linking deaths with vehicles and population. Traffic Engineering and Control 26(11): 547-549.
6. Andreassen D (1991). Population and registered vehicle data and road deaths. Accid. Anal. Prev. 23(5): 343-351.
7. Chakrobort S, Roy SK (2005). Traffic accident characteristics of Kolkata. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific 74: 75-86.
8. Chiou YC (2006). An artificial network-based expert system for appraisal of two-car crash accidents. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(4): 777-785.
9. Delen D, Sharda R, Besson M (2006). Identifying significant predictors of injury severity in traffic accidents using a series of artificial neural networks. Accid. Anal. Prev. 38(3):434-444.
10. General Directorate of Security Affairs (2007). www.egm.gov.tr.
11. nd Edition, Prentice Hall.
12. MacLean S (1983). Relationship between variables Proc., Esso-Monash Civ. Eng. Workshop on Traffic Accident Evaluation, Department of Civil Engineering, Monash University.
13. Mekky A (1985). Effect of rapid increase in motorization levels on road fatality rates in some rich developing countries. Accid. Anal. Prev. 17(2): 101-109.
14. Mohan D, Bawa PS (1985). An analysis of road traffic fatalities in Delhi, India. Accid. Anal. Prev. 17(1): 33-45.
15. Mussone L, Ferrari A, Oneta M (1999). An analysis of urban collision using an artificial intelligence model. Accid. Anal. Prev. 31(8): 705-718.
16. Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, Mohan D, Hyder AA, Jarawan E, Mathers C (eds) (2004). The world report on road traffic injury prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
17. Preston B (1980). Road safety: international comparison. Transport Reviews 1(1): 75-98.
18. Smeed RJ (1949). Some statistics aspects of road safety research. J. Royal Stat. Society, Series A, Part I: 1-34.
19. Smeed RJ (1968). Variations in the pattern of accident rates in different countries and their causes. Traffic Engineering and Control 10(7): 364-371.
20. Smeed RJ (1972). The usefulness of formulae in traffic engineering and road safety. Accid. Anal. Prev. 4(4): 303-312.
21. Turkish Statistical Institute (2007). www.tuik.gov.tr.
22. Valli PP (2005). Road accident models for large metropolitan cities of India. IATSS Res. 29(1): 57-65.