What medical specialists like and dislike about health technology assessment reports

Journal of Health Services Research and Policy

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 197-203

  Lehoux, Pascale ^a   Hivon, Myriam ^a   Denis, Jean Louis ^a   Tailliez, Stephanie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; DOWN SYNDROME; ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRENATAL SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; ELECTROCONVULSIVE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MEDICINE; POLICY MAKING; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 70349636589     PISSN: 13558196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jhsrp.2009.008153     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Wild C, Gibis B. Evaluations of health interventions in social insurance-based countries: Germany, the Netherlands, and Austria. Health Pol 2003;63:187-196 (Pubitemid 36138719)
2. Sassi F. The European way to health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:282-290
3. Hanney SR, Gonzalez-Block MA, Buxton MJ, Kogan M. The utilisation of health research in policy-making: concepts, examples and methods of assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 2003;1:2 (Pubitemid 39112029)
4. Hivon M, Lehoux P, Denis J-L, Tailliez S. The use of health technology assessment in decision-making: coresponsibility of users and producers? Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:268-275
5. Davis E, Littlejohns P. Views of Directors of Public Health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: results of a postal survey. J Public Health Med 2002;24:319-325 (Pubitemid 36043195)
6. Farmer J, Chesson R. NICE lessons to be learned. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2001;17:222-235
7. Lehoux P, Hivon M, Denis J-L, Tailliez S. Health technology assessment in the Canadian health policy arena: examining the relationships between evaluators and stake holders. Evaluation 2008;14:295-321
8. Jacob R, McGregor M. Assessing the impact of health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1997;13:68-80 (Pubitemid 27138809)
9. Goering P, Butterill D, Jacobson N, Sturtevant D. Linkage and exchange at the organizational level: a model of collaboration between research and policy. J Health Serv Res Policy 2003;8:14-19 (Pubitemid 37238129)
10. McGregor M, Brophy J. End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: a way to increase impact. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2005;21:263-267 (Pubitemid 40656557)
11. Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1995
12. Straus A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990
13. Miller FA, Giacomini M, Ahern C. Contending visions in the evolution of genetic medicine: the case of cancer genetic services in Ontario, Canada. Soc Sci Med 2008;67:152-160 (Pubitemid 351756478)
14. Lehoux P, Tailliez S, Denis J-L, Hivon M. Redefining HTA in Canada: diversification of products and contextualization of findings. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:325-336
15. Lavis JN, Robertson D, Woodside JM, McLeod CB, Abelson J, the Knowledge Transfer Study Group. How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision-makers? Milbank Q 2003;81:221-248
16. Moran M, Alexander E. Technology, American democracy and health care. Br J Polit Sci 1997;27:573-594 (Pubitemid 127139566)
17. Hutchings A, Raine R, Sanderson C, Black N. A comparison of formal consensus methods used for developing clinical guidelines. J Health Serv Res Policy 2006;11:218-224 (Pubitemid 44622314)
18. Wailoo A, Roberts J, Brazier J, McCabe C. Efficiency, equity, and NICE clinical guidelines. BMJ 2004;328:536-537 (Pubitemid 38316620)
19. Tunis S. Why Medicare has not established criteria for coverage decisions. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2196-2198 (Pubitemid 38638002)
20. Cookson R, Maynard A. Health technology assessment in Europe. Improving clarity and performance. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:639-650 (Pubitemid 30602101)
21. Berg M, van der Grinten T, Klazinga N. Technology assessment, priority setting, and appropriate care in Dutch health care. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2004;20:36-43 (Pubitemid 38656959)
22. Slaughter PM, Pinfold SP, Laupacis A. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in asymptomatic men. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), 2002
23. Banken R. The use of electroconvulsive therapy in Québec. Montreal: Agence d'Evaluation des Technologies et des Modes d'Intervention en Santé (AETMIS), 2002
24. Framarin A. First-trimester prenatal screening for Down syndrome and other aneuploidies. Montreal: Agence d'Evaluation des Technologies et des Modes d'Intervention en Santé (AETMIS), 2003