A false-positive fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) imaging result for a patient after augmentation mammaplasty

Aesthetic Plastic Surgery

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 611-615

  Kobe, Kyoko ^a   Chin, Takafumi ^a   Aoki, Ritsu ^a   Hyakusoku, Hiko ^a  

^a NIPPON MEDICAL SCHOOL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Augmentation mammaplasty; Breast cancer; Breast implant; Hydrocarbon injection; PET; PET CT; Positron emission tomography; Silicone gel injection

Indexed keywords

FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; TUMOR MARKER;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILICONE PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;

EID: 70349599039     PISSN: 0364216X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-009-9347-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. S Kawahara H Hyakusoku R Ogawa S Ohkubo H Igarashi K Hirakawa 2006 Clinical diagnosis of implant materials for breast augmentation Ann Plast Surg 57 6 12 16799300 10.1097/01.sap.0000214185.94467.a3 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XhtlGrtb7E (Pubitemid 43982244)
2. B Erguvan-Dogan WT Yang 2006 Direct injection of paraffin into the breast: mammographic, sonographic, and MRI features of early complications AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 888 894 16498126 10.2214/AJR.05.0064 (Pubitemid 46100283)
3. VR Pennisi 1984 Obscure carcinoma encountered in subcutaneous mastectomy in silicone- and paraffin-injected breasts Plast Reconstr Surg 74 535 538 6091166 10.1097/00006534-198410000-00015 1:STN:280:DyaL2M%2FhsFarsw%3D%3D
4. RL Wahl MA Helvie AE Chang I Andersson 1994 Detection of breast cancer in women after augmentation mammoplasty using fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose-PET J Nucl Med 35 872 875 8176475 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3jtFarsA%3D%3D
5. H Hyakusoku 1999 Salvage operations of cases with unfavorable results after augmentation mammaplasty J Jpn Soc Aesthet Plast Surg 21 16 22
6. SA McIntosh K Horgan 2008 Augmentation mammoplasty: effect on diagnosis of breast cancer J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61 124 129 18039600 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.035 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c%2FmtVKmug%3D%3D
7. AJ Leibman R Sybers 1994 Mammographic and sonographic findings after silicone injection Ann Plast Surg 33 412 414 7810958 10.1097/00000637-199410000- 00009 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7htVSjtg%3D%3D
8. MJ Silverstein N Handel P Gamagami JR Waisman ED Gierson RJ Rosser R Steyskal W Colburn 1988 Breast cancer in women after augmentation mammoplasty Arch Surg 123 681 685 2835940 1:STN:280:DyaL1c3itFChtA%3D%3D
9. EL Hodgson CM Malata 2002 Implant-based breast reconstruction following mastectomy Breast Dis 16 47 63 15687657
10. SJ Hoshaw PJ Klein BD Clark RR Cook LL Perkins 2001 Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival Plast Reconstr Surg 107 1393 1407 11335807 10.1097/00006534-200105000-00012 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jvFemtQ%3D%3D
11. K Yayoi 2001 Other benign breast diseases Geka-Chiryo 85 176 182
12. S Sakai 1994 Problems of mammary fill up materials Igaku no Ayumi 168 700 701
13. JF Vansteenkiste SG Stroobants PJ Dupont PR De Leyn EK Verbeken GJ Deneffe LA Mortelmans MG Demedts 1999 Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of 125 cases. Leuven Lung Cancer Group J Clin Oncol 17 3201 3206 10506619 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjvVWruw%3D%3D
14. ER Port H Yeung M Gonen L Liberman J Caravelli P Borgen S Larson 2006 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scanning affects surgical management in selected patients with high-risk, operable breast carcinoma Ann Surg Oncol 13 677 684 16538409 10.1245/ASO.2006.03.035
15. AK Buck H Schirrmeister T Mattfeldt SN Reske 2004 Biological characterisation of breast cancer by means of PET Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 S80 S87 15127240 10.1007/s00259-004-1529-6
16. H Hayes Jr J Vandergrift WC Diner 1988 Mammography and breast implants Plast Reconstr Surg 82 1 8 3380900 10.1097/00006534-198882010-00001
17. DL Miglioretti CM Rutter BM Geller G Cutter WE Barlow R Rosenberg DL Weaver SH Taplin R Ballard-Barbash PA Carney BC Yankaskas K Kerlikowske 2004 Effect of breast augmentation on the accuracy of mammography and cancer characteristics JAMA 291 442 450 14747501 10.1001/jama.291.4.442 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1Smtg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 38129748)
18. K Kerlikowske D Grady J Barclay EA Sickles V Ernster 1996 Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 276 33 38 8667536 10.1001/jama.276.1.33 1:STN:280: DyaK283ptVeqtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 26231053)
19. KA Skinner H Silberman W Dougherty P Gamagami J Waisman R Sposto MJ Silverstein 2001 Breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty Ann Surg Oncol 8 138 144 11258778 10.1007/s10434-001-0138-x 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzgt1agsQ%3D%3D
20. B Zangheri C Messa M Picchio LGC Landoni F Fazio 2004 PET/CT and breast cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 S135 S142 15133636 10.1007/s00259-004-1536- 7
21. SK Yang N Cho WK Moon 2007 The role of PET/CT for evaluating breast cancer Korean J Radiol 8 429 437 17923786 10.3348/kjr.2007.8.5.429
22. JF Santiago M Gonen H Yeung H Macapinlac S Larson 2006 A retrospective analysis of the impact of 18F-FDG PET scans on clinical management of 133 breast cancer patients Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 50 61 67 16557205 1:STN:280: DC%2BD287mvVSnsg%3D%3D
23. N Handel MJ Silverstein 2006 Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in augmented women Plast Reconstr Surg 118 587 593 16932162 10.1097/01.prs. 0000233038.47009.04 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXlvF2nsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44318913)
24. CA Gumucio P Pin VL Young J Destouet B Monsees J Eichling 1989 The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and soft-tissue masses Plast Reconstr Surg 84 772 778 2813586 1:STN:280: DyaK3c%2Fkslajug%3D%3D
25. PA Carney DL Miglioretti BC Yankaskas K Kerlikowske R Rosenberg CM Rutter BM Geller LA Abraham SH Taplin M Dignan G Cutter R Ballard-Barbash 2003 Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 168 175 12558355
26. L Morgenstern SH Gleischman SL Michel JE Rosenberg I Knight D Goodman 1985 Relation of free silicone to human breast carcinoma Arch Surg 120 573 577 2985027 1:STN:280:DyaL2M7ntlymsA%3D%3D
27. P Lind I Igerc T Beyer P Reinprecht K Hausegger 2004 Advantages and limitations of FDG PET in the follow-up of breast cancer Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31 S125 S134 15085295 10.1007/s00259-004-1562-5 (Pubitemid 39361945)
28. AN Mesbahi CM McCarthy JJ Disa 2008 Breast reconstruction with prosthetic implants Cancer J 14 230 235 18677130 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31817fb7c3
29. MJ Silverstein N Handel P Gamagami ED Gierson M Furmanski AR Collins M Epstein BF Cohlan 1992 Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses Eur J Cancer 28 635 640 1591087 10.1016/S0959-8049(05)80115-7 1:STN:280:DyaK383ntlensw%3D%3D
30. P Bhargava E Glass M Ghesani 2006 Inflammatory F-18 FDG uptake secondary to ruptured breast prosthesis Clin Nucl Med 31 227 228 16550024 10.1097/01.rlu.0000204490.25782.f8 (Pubitemid 44310048)
31. DY Noh IJ Yun HS Kang YC Kim JS Kim JK Chung 1999 Detection of cancer in augmented breasts by positron emission tomography Eur J Surg 165 847 851 10533759 10.1080/11024159950189339 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgtFehtA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29459704)
32. ME Juweid BD Cheson 2006 Positron-emission tomography and assessment of cancer therapy N Engl J Med 354 496 507 16452561 10.1056/NEJMra050276 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28Xptlajsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43200300)
33. AR Muzaffar RJ Rohrich 2002 The silicone gel-filled breast implant controversy: an update Plast Reconstr Surg 109 742 747 11818862 10.1097/00006534-200202000-00049 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FptVOiuw%3D%3D
34. SL Spear CJ Spittler 2001 Breast reconstruction with implants and expanders Plast Reconstr Surg 107 177 187 11176621 10.1097/00006534-200101000- 00029 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7kt1Wntg%3D%3D
35. S Ueda H Tsuda H Asakawa T Shigekawa K Fukatsu N Kondo M Yamamoto Y Hama K Tamura J Ishida Y Abe H Mochizuki 2008 Clinicopathological and prognostic relevance of uptake level using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography fusion imaging (18F-FDG PET/CT) in primary breast cancer Jpn J Clin Oncol 38 250 258 18407934 10.1093/jjco/hyn019 (Pubitemid 351583988)
36. HL Peng CC Wu WM Choi MS Hui TN Lu LK Chen 1999 Breast cancer detection using magnetic resonance imaging in breasts injected with liquid silicone Plast Reconstr Surg 104 2116 2120 11149777 10.1097/00006534-199912000-00026 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptlWgtA%3D%3D
37. R Hurwitz 2003 F-18 FDG positron emission tomographic imaging in a case of ruptured breast implant: inflammation or recurrent tumor? Clin Nucl Med 28 755 756 12972998 10.1097/01.rlu.0000082664.22354.4b (Pubitemid 38295201)
38. H Hyakusoku R Aoki 2005 Troubles after aesthetic surgery and their treatments Jpn J Plast Reconstr Surg 48 21 28