Exploring the influence of local policy networks on the implementation of drug policy reform: The case of California's substance abuse and crime prevention act

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 795-815

  Percival, Garrick L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349583248     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mun035     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 2003. Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
2. Alter, Catherine, and Jarold Hage. 1993. Organisations working together. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Bardach, Eugene. 1998. Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
4. Barrilleaux, Charles, Richard Feiock, and Robert E. Crew Jr. 1992. Measuring and comparing American states' administrative characteristics. State and Local Government Review 24:441-447
5. Benson, J. K. 1982. A framework for policy analysis. In Inter-organisational coordination, ed. D. L. Rogers and D. A. Whetton. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
6. Brewer, G., and S. C. Seldon. 2000. Whistle blowers in the federal civil service: New evidence of the public service ethic. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:685-712.
7. Carlsson, Lars. 2000. Policy networks as collective action. Policy Studies Journal 28:502-520
8. Church, Thomas W., and Robert T. Nakamura. 1993. Cleaning up the mess: Implementation strategies in superfund. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
9. Dillman, Don A. 2000. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10. Enticott, Gareth, George A. Boyne, and Richard M. Walker. 2008. The use of multiple informants in public administration research: Data aggregation using organizational echelons. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Advance access published on September 12, 2008, doi:10.1093/ jopart/mun017.
11. Ford, A., and Micky J. W. Smith. 2002, 2003. Substance abuse and crime prevention act of 2000: Analysis of plans from the 58 Counties. Report to U.S. Center for Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs. Washington, DC: Health Systems Research.
12. Goldsmith, Stephen, and William D. Eggers. 2004. Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
13. Hall, T. E., and Laurence O'toole. 2004. Shaping formal networks through the regulatory process. Administration and Society 36 (2):1-22.
14. Hanf, K., and F. W. Scharpf. 1978. Interorganizational policymaking. London: Sage Modern Political Series.
15. Hero, Rodney E. 1998. Faces of inequality: Social diversity in American politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Hill, Elisabeth G. 2000. Implementing Proposition 36: Issues, challenges, and opportunities. A Report by California's Legislative Analyst Office. http://www.lao.ca.gov/2000/prop36/121400-prop-36.html (accessed September 16, 2006).
17. Hjern, Benny, and David O. Porter. 1981. Implementation structures: A new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies 2/3:211-227
18. Hudson, Bob. 2004. Analyzing network partnerships. Public Management Review 6:75-94.
19. Huxham, Chris, and Siv Vangen. 2005. Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Rutledge.
20. Katzenbach, Jon R., and Douglas K. Smith. 1993. The wisdom of teams. HarperCollins.
21. Kickert, Walter J. M., Eric-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koppenjan. 1997. Introduction: A management perspective on policy networks. In Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector, ed. Walter J. M. Kickert, Eric-Hans Klijn, and Joop F. M. Koppenjan, 1-14. London: Sage.
22. Klijn, Erik-Hans. 1996. Analyzing and managing policy processes in complex networks: A theoretical examination of the concept policy networks and its problems. Administration and Society 28: 90-119.
23. Koppenjan, Joop, and Erik-Hans Klijn. 2004. Managing uncertainties in networks. New York: Routledge.
24. Lynn, Laurence E., Jr., Carolyn J. Heinrich, and Carolyn J. Hill. 2000. Studying governance and public management: Why? How? In Governance and performance: New perspectives, ed. Carolyn J. Heinrich and Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., 1-33. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
25. Males, Michael, Daniel Macallier, Cheryl Rios, and Deborah Vargas. 2000. Drug use and justice: An examination of California drug enforcement policy. Washington, DC: The Justice Policy Institute.
26. Marsh, D., and Roderick Rhodes. 1992. Policy networks in British government. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. Mazmanian, Daniel, and Paul Sabatier. 1989. Implementation and public policy. Chicago, IL: Scott Foresman.
28. McGuire, M. 2002. Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review 62:599-609.
29. Meier, Kenneth J., and Laurence O'toole. 2005. Managerial networking: Issues of measurement and design. Administration and society 37:523-541
30. Milward, H. Brinton, and Keith G. Provan. 1993. The hollow state: Private provision of public services. In Public policy for democracy, ed. Helen Ingram and Steven R. Smith, 222-240 Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
31. ---. 2000. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10:359-379
32. Oliver, Eric J., and Tali Mendelberg. 2000. Reconsidering the environmental determinants of white racial attitudes. American Journal of Political Science 44:574-590
33. O'Toole, Laurence J., Jr. 1997. Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review 57:45-52.
34. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations. A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.
35. Provan, Keith, and H. Brinton Milward. 1995. A preliminary theory of network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly 40:1-33.
36. Raab, J. 2002. Where do policy networks come from? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12:581-622.
37. Rhodes, Roderick A. W. 1997. Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, re.exivity, and accountability. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
38. Riccio, James, Howard S. Bloom, and Carolyn J. Hill. 2000. Management, organizational characteristics, and performance: The case of welfare-to-work programs. In Governance and performance: New perspectives, ed. Carolyn J. Heinrich and Laurence E. Lynn, Jr., 166-198 Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
39. Riley, Jack K., Pat Ebener, James Chiesa, Susan Turner, and Jeanne Ringel. 2001. Drug offenders and the criminal justice system: Will Proposition 36 treat or create problems? San Francisco, CA: RAND.
40. Robinson, Scott E. 2006. A decade of treating networks seriously. The Policy Studies Journal 34:589-598
41. Sabatier, Paul. 1986. Top down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6:21-48.
42. Sabatier, Paul and Hank Jenkins-Smith, eds. 1993. Policy change and learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
43. Salamon, Lester. 2002. The new governance and the tools of public action; an introduction. In The tools of government: A guide to the new governance, ed. Lester Salamon, 1-47. Oxford University Press.
44. Schneider, Mark, John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta, and Matthew Edwardsen. 2003. Building consensual institutions: Networks and the national estuary program. American Journal of Political Science 42:398-417.
45. Thompson, James D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. van buren, E. V., Erik-Hans Klijn, and Joop Koopenjan. 2003. Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13:193-212.
47. Volden, Craig. 2006. States as policy laboratories: Emulating success in the children's health insurance program. American Journal of Political Science 50:294-312.
48. Walker, Robert M., and G. Enticott. 2004. Exploring variations in management reform values and actions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14:417-434