The coproduction of immigrant integration policy and research in the Netherlands: The case of the Scientific Council for Government Policy

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 561-573

  Scholten, Peter ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN IMMIGRANT; GEOGRAPHICAL KNOWLEDGE; LABOR DIVISION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RESEARCH INSTITUTION;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 70349579683     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/030234209X469972     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abelson, D E 2002. Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. London: McGill-Queen's University Press.
2. ACOM. (1989). Een beter beleid? The Hague: ACOM. Blume, S S, R P Hagendijk and A A M Prins 1991. Political culture and the policy orientation in Dutch social science. In Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, P Wagner (ed.) pp 168-190. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bourdieu, P 1975. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information, 14(6), 19-47.
4. Bourdieu, P 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
5. Bovenkerk, F and L Brunt 1983. Where sociology falls short: how Dutch sociologists observe social reality. Netherlands Journal of Sociology: Sociologia Neerlandica, 19, 65-78.
6. Den Hoed, P 1995. Bestuur en beleid van binnenuit: een analyse van instituties. Meppel, the Netherlands: Boom.
7. Department of Home Affairs 1994. Contours Memorandum on the Integration of Ethnic Minorities. The Hague: SDU.
8. Entzinger, H 1981. De ACOM als voorbeeld van onderzoeks programmering; maar wat levert het nu op aan kwaliteitsverhoging? In Sociaal beleidsonderzoek; luxe of noodzaak? B W Frijling and C Rottländer-Meyer (eds.). Zoetermeer, the Netherlands: Actaboek.
9. Entzinger, H 2005. Changing the rules while the game is on; From multiculturalism to assimilation in the Netherlands. In Migration, Citizenship, Ethnos: Incorporation Regimes in Germany, Western Europe and North America, M Bodemann and G Yurkadul (eds.). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
10. Ezrahi, Y 1990. The Descent of Icarus. Science and the Trans- formation of Contemporary Democracy. London, UK: Harvard University Press.
11. Gieryn, T F 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 4(6), 781-795.
12. Gieryn, T F 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
13. Gusfield, J 1976. The literary rhetoric of science; comedy and pathos in drinking driver research. American Sociological Re- view, 41(1), 16.
14. Guston, D H 2000. Between Politics and Science. Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New Jersey: Rutgers University.
15. Halffman, W 2003. Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/toxicology and Aquatic Hazards of Chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands. Boechout, the Netherlands: Albatros.
16. Hirsch-Ballin, E M H 1979. Publiekrecht en beleid. Fundamentele kwesties rondom het functioneren van de Wetenschappelijke Raad voor het Regeringsbeleid. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Samson.
17. Hoppe, R 2005. Rethinking the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science 3(3), 199-215.
18. Jasanoff, S 1990. The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Jasanoff, S 2004. States of Knowledge; the Co-production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.
20. Köbben, A J F 1980. Het heilig vuur; over moeilijkheden en mogelijkheden bij onderzoek inzake minderheden. Leiden: Oratie.
21. Miller, C A 2001. Hybrid management: boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology and Human Values, 26(4), 478-500.
22. Muus, P and R Penninx 1989. Kanttekeningen bij de weten- schappelijkheid van het WRR-rapport 'Allochtonenbeleid'. Migrantenstudies, 5(4), 2-12.
23. Nowotny, H P Scott and M Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. London: Polity Press.
24. Penninx, R 1979. Naar een algemeen etnisch minderheden-beleid? The Hague: SDU.
25. Penninx, R 1988. Minderheidsvorming en emancipatie: balans van kennisverwerving ten aanzien van immigranten en woon- wagenbewoners 1967-1987. Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands: Samsom.
26. Penninx, R 2005. Bridges between research and policy? The case of post-war immigration and integration policies in the Netherlands. International Journal on Multicultural Studies, 7(1), 33-48.
27. Rath, J 1991. Minorisering: de sociale constructie van 'etnische minderheden'. Amsterdam: SUA.
28. Rath, J 2001. Research on immigrant ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. In The Politics of Social Science Research. Race, Ethnicity and Social Change, P Ratcliffe (ed.). New York: Palgrave.
29. Salter, L and E Levy 1988. Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
30. Scheffer, P 2000. Het Multiculturele Drama. In De Volkskrant, 29 January 2009.
31. Schnabel, P 1998. De multiculturele illusie: een pleidooi voor aanpassing en assimilatie. Utrecht, the Netherlands: FORUM.
32. Schneider, A L and H Ingram 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Kansas, City, MO: University of Kansas Press.
33. Shapin, S 1992. Discipline and bounding: the history and sociology of science as seen through the externalism-internalism debate. History of Science, 30(90), 333-369.
34. Shapin, S and S Schaffer 1985. The Leviathan and the Air-Pump; Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Sommer, M 2002. Makelaars in Minderheden. De Volkskrant, 28-12-2002.
36. Stone, D 1998. Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Cass.
37. Stone, D and M Garnett 1998. Introduction: think tanks, policy advice and governance. In Think Tanks Across Nations. A Comparative Approach, H A G Stone (ed.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
38. Van der Zwan, A and H Entzinger 1992. Beleidsopvolging Minderhedendebat. Advies in opdracht van de minister van binnenlandse zaken.
39. Van Putten, N 1990. De Adviescommissie Onderzoek Minderheden: college met gezag. In Wetenschap en Partijdigheid. F Bovenkerk, F Buijs and H Tromp (eds.). Assen, the Nether- lands: Van Gorcum.
40. Verwey-Jonker Institute 2004. Bronnenonderzoek voor de Tijdelijke Parlementaire Onderzoekscommissie Integratiebeleid. The Hague: SDU.
41. Weaver, K 1989. The changing world of think tanks. Political Science and Politics, 22(3), 563-578.
42. Weiss, C H 1977. Research for policy's sake: The enlightenment function of social science research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531.
43. Wildavsky, A 1979. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis: Speaking Truth to Power. London: Macmillian.
44. Wittrock, B 1991. Social knowledge and public policy: eight models of interaction. In Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads, P Wagner (ed.), pp 28-85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. WRR (Scientific Council for Government Policy) 1979. Ethnic Minorities. Report to the Government, nr. 17. SDU, The Hague.
46. WRR (Scientific Council for Government Policy) 1989. Immigrant Policy. Report to the Government, nr. 36. SDU, The Hague.
47. WRR (Scientific Council for Government Policy) 2001. The Netherlands as Immigration Society. Report to the Government, nr. 70. SDU, The Hague.