Using personas and prototypes to define nurses' requirements for a novel patient monitoring display

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 146, Issue , 2009, Pages 69-73

  Koch, Sven ^a   Sheeren, Amanda ^b   Staggers, Nancy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Human computer interaction; Monitor design; Nurses; Personas

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PATIENT MONITORING;

DATA REPRESENTATIONS; DESIGN PREFERENCES; MENTAL MODEL; PAPER PROTOTYPES; PERSONAS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEWS; WAVE FORMS;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERVIEW; METHODOLOGY; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OBSERVATION;

DATA DISPLAY; HUMANS; INTENSIVE CARE UNITS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NURSING ASSESSMENT; OBSERVATION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70349573303     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-024-7-69     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Gurushanthaiah K, Weinger MB, Englund CE. Visual display format affects the ability of anesthesiologists to detect acute physiologic changes. A laboratory study employing a clinical display simulator. Anesthesiology. 1995 Dec;83(6):1184-93.
2. Jungk A, Thull B, Hoeft A, Rau G. Evaluation of two new ecological interface approaches for the anesthesia workplace. Journal of clinical monitoring and computing. 2000;16(4):243-58.
3. Agutter J, Drews F, Syroid N, Westneskow D, Albert R, Strayer D, et al. Evaluation of graphic cardiovascular display in a high-fidelity simulator. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2003 Nov;97(5):1403-13.
4. Agutter J, Albert R, Syroid N, Doig A, Johnson K, Westenskow D, editors. Arterial Blood Gas Visualization for Critical Care Clinicians. Annual meeting of the society for technology in anesthesiology; 2006; San Diego, CA.
5. Effken JA, Kim NG, Shaw RE. Making the constraints visible: testing the ecological approach to interface design. Ergonomics. 1997 Jan;40(1):1-27.
6. Cooper A. The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How To Restore The Sanity. Indianapolis, IN, USA: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.; 1999.
7. Cooper A, Reimann R, Cronin D. About Face 3: The Essentials of Interaction Design. Wiley; 2007.
8. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K. Contextual design: defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1998.
9. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993.
10. Staggers N, Kobus D. Comparing response time, errors, and satisfaction between text-based and graphical user interfaces during nursing order tasks. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Mar-Apr;7(2):164-76.