Intention-based expressions in GASTINE

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 391-396

  Latoszek Berendsen, A ^a   De Clercq, P ^b   Van Den Herik, J ^a   Hasman, A ^c  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Medecs BV   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computerized guidelines; Decision support system; Goal; Intention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EDEMA; HEART FAILURE; HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

DECISION MAKING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EDEMA; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEART FAILURE; HUMANS; INTENTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 70349565596     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME0591     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Woolf SH, et al. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999; 318 (7182): 527-530.
2. Martens JD, Werkhoven MJ, Severens JL, Winkens RA. Effects of a behaviour independent financial incentive on prescribing behaviour of general practitioners. J Eval Clin Pract 2007; 13 (3): 369-373.
3. Cabana MD, et al. Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA 1999; 282 (15): 1458-1465.
4. Burgers JS, et al. Characteristics of high-quality guidelines: evaluation of 86 clinical guidelines developed in ten European countries and Canada. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2003; 19 (1): 148-157.
5. Patel VL, et al. Representing clinical guidelines in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5 (5): 467-483.
6. Gillois P, et al. From paper-based to electronic guidelines: application to French guidelines. Medinfo 2001; 10 (Pt 1): 196-200.
7. Shahar Y. Automated Support to Clinical Guidelines and Care Plans: The Intention-Oriented View. 2002 (cited 2008, Feb 27). Available from: http://openclinical.org/docs/int/briefingpapers/shahar.pdf
8. de Clercq PA, et al. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64 (2-3): 285-318.
9. Latoszek-Berendsen A, et al. With good intentions. Int J Med Inform 2007; 76 (3): 440-446.
10. Dictionary (cited 2008, Feb 27). Available from: www.dictionary.com
11. de Clercq PA, Hasman A, Blom JA, Korsten HH. The application of ontologies and problem-solving methods for the development of shareable guidelines. Artif Intell Med 2001; 22 (1): 1-22.
12. Winikoff M, et al.. Declarative and Procedural Goals in Intelligent Agent Systems. 2002 Toulouse, France, April 22-25, 2002.
13. Musen MA, Gennari JH, Eriksson H, Tu SW, Puerta AR. PROTEGE-II: computer support for development of intelligent systems from libraries of components. Medinfo 1995; 8 Pt 1: 766-770.
14. Shahar Y, et al. A Task-Specific Ontology for the Application and Critiquing of Time-Oriented Clinical Guidelines. Lecture Notes In Computer Science Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe. 1997; 1211: 51-61.
15. Sips RJ, Braun L, Roos N. Enabling protocol-based medical critiquing. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 471-476.
16. Johnson PD, Tu S, Booth N, Sugden B, Purves IN. Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care. Proc AMIA Symp 2000. pp 389-393.
17. Marcos M, Berger G, van Harmelen F, ten Teije A, Roomans H, Miksch S. Using critiquing for improving medical protocols: harder than it seems. In: Proc of the 8th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME-2001) 2001. pp 431-441.
18. Shahar Y, Musen M. Plan recognition and revision in support of guideline-based care. Working notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Representing Mental States and Mechanisms 1995. pp 118-126.