An evolutionary approach to query-sampling for heterogeneous systems

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 226-232

  Jung, Jason J ^a  

^a Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Context; Evolutionary approach; Ontology mapping; Query sampling

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT; DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTS; EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH; EVOLUTIONARY METHOD; HETEROGENEOUS SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SOURCES; ONTOLOGY MAPPING; PRECISION AND RECALL; QUERY-SAMPLING; RESOURCE DESCRIPTION; SAMPLING METHOD; SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; USER FEEDBACK;

SEMANTICS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 70349561502     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Aksoy D. Information source selection for resource constrained environments. SIGMOD Records 34 4 (2005) 15-20
2. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek-Wiener, C., Arpinar, I. B., & Sheth, A. P. (2003). Context-aware semantic association ranking. In I. F. Cruz, V. Kashyap, S. Decker & R. Eckstein (Eds.), Proceedings of the first international workshop on semantic web and databases (SWDB'03), Co-located with VLDB 2003 (pp. 33-50). Berlin, Germany: Humboldt-Universität.
3. Azzopardi, L., Baillie, M., & Crestani, F. (2006). Adaptive query-based sampling for distributed ir. In Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR'06) (pp. 605-606). NY, USA: ACM Press.
4. Beyer H.G., and Schwefel H.P. Evolution strategies-a comprehensive introduction. Natural Computing 1 1 (2002) 3-52
5. Callan J., and Connell M. Query-based sampling of text databases. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 19 2 (2001) 97-130
6. Cantú-Paz E. Order statistics and selection methods of evolutionary algorithms. Information Processing Letters 82 1 (2002) 15-22
7. Crespo, A., & Garcia-Molina, H. (2005). Semantic overlay networks for p2p systems. In G. Moro, S. Bergamaschi & K. Aberer, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the third international workshop on agents and peer-to-peer computing (AP2PC 2004). Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3601, pp. 1-13). Springer.
8. Euzenat, J., & Valtchev, P. (2004). Similarity-based ontology alignment in OWL-Lite. In R. L. de Mántaras & L. Saitta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th European conference on artificial intelligence (ECAI'2004), August 22-27 (pp. 333-337) Valencia, Spain: IOS Press.
9. Gravano L., García-Molina H., and Tomasic A. Gloss: Text-source discovery over the internet. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 24 2 (1999) 229-264
10. Haase, P., & Stojanovic, L. (2005). Consistent evolution of owl ontologies. In A. Gómez-Pérez & J. Euzenat (Eds.), Proceedings of the second european semantic web conference (ESWC 2005), Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29-June 1. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3532, pp. 182-197). Springer.
11. Ipeirotis, P. G., & Gravano, L. (2004). When one sample is not enough: improving text database selection using shrinkage. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data (SIGMOD'04) (pp. 767-778). NY, USA: ACM Press.
12. Jung J.J. Semantic preprocessing of web request streams for web usage mining. Journal of Universal Computer Science 11 8 (2005) 1383-1396
13. Jung J.J. Ontological framework based on contextual mediation for collaborative information retrieval. Information Retrieval 10 1 (2007) 85-109
14. Jung J.J. Consensus-based evaluation framework for cooperative information retrieval systems. Knowledge and Information Systems 18 2 (2009) 199-211
15. Jung J.J. Contextualized query sampling to discover semantic resource descriptions on the web. Information Processing and Management 45 2 (2009) 283-290
16. Jung J.J. Using evolution strategy for cooperative focused crawling on semantic web. Neural Computing and Applications 18 3 (2009) 213-221
17. Maedche A., and Staab S. Ontology learning for the semantic web. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16 2 (2001) 72-79
18. Missikof M., Navigli R., and Velardi P. Integrated approach to web ontology learning and engineering. Computer 35 11 (2002) 60-63
19. Nguyen N.T. Processing inconsistency of knowledge on semantic level. Journal of Universal Computer Science 11 2 (2005) 285-302
20. Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. (2000). Prompt: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the seventeenth national conference on artificial intelligence and twelfth conference on on innovative applications of artificial intelligence (pp. 450-455). AAAI Press/The MIT Press.
21. Noy, N. F., Chugh, A., Liu, W., & Musen, M. A. (2006). A framework for ontology evolution in collaborative environments. In I.F. Cruz, S. Decker, D. Allemang, C. Preist, D. Schwabe, P. Mika, M. Uschold & L. Aroyo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th international semantic web conference (ISWC 2006). Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 4273, pp. 544-558). Springer.
22. Noy N.F., and Klein M.C.A. Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems 6 4 (2004) 428-440
23. Rasolofo, Y., Abbaci, F., & Savoy, J. (2001). Approaches to collection selection and results merging for distributed information retrieval. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM'01) (pp. 191-198). NY, USA: ACM Press.
24. Shvaiko P., and Euzenat J. A survey of schema-based matching approaches. Journal of Data Semantics 4 (2005) 146-171
25. Xu, J., & Callen, J. (1998). Effective retrieval with distributed collections. In Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR'98) (pp. 112-120). NY, USA: ACM Press.