Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Volumn 3532, Issue , 2005, Pages 182-197

  Haase, Peter ^a   Stojanovic, Ljiljana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; OWL ONTOLOGIES; RESOLUTION STRATEGIES; USER-DEFINED CONSISTENCY;

SEMANTICS;

EID: 26444478633     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1007/11431053_13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Kenneth Baclawski, Christopher J. Matheus, Mieczyslaw M. Kokar, Jerzy Letkowski, and Paul A. Kogut. Towards a symptom ontology for semantic web applications. In Mcllraith et al. [12], pages 650-667.
2. Scan Bechhofer, Frank van Harmelen, Jim Hendler, Ian Horrocks, Deborah McGuinness, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, and Lynn Andrea Stein. Owl web ontology language reference. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/.
3. Sara Brockmans, Raphael Volz, Andreas Eberhart, and Peter Löffler. Visual modeling of owl dl ontologies using uml. In Mcllraith et al. [12], pages 198-213.
4. Zhongli Ding and Yun Peng. A Probabilistic Extension to Ontology Language OWL. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences (HICSS-37)., Big Island, Hawaii, January 2004.
5. D. Fensel. Ontologies: dynamics networks of meaning. In Proceedings of the 1st Semantic web working symposium, Stanford, CA, USA, 2001.
6. Giorgos Flouris. Belief change in arbitrary logics. In HDMS, 2004.
7. I. Horrocks and P. F. Patel-Schneider. Reducing OWL Entailment to Description Logic Satisfiability. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(4), 2004.
8. I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and F. van Harmelen. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The Making of a Web Ontology Language. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1), 2003.
9. I. Horrocks, U. Sattler, and S. Tobies. Practical Reasoning for Very Expressive Description Logics. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 8(3):239-263, 2000.
10. Michel Klein. Change Management for Distributed Ontologies. PhD thesis, Free University of Amsterdam, 2004.
11. Holger Knublauch, Ray W. Fergerson, Natalya Fridman Noy, and Mark A. Musen. The protégé owl plugin: An open development environment for semantic web applications. In McIlraith et al. [12], pages 229-243.
12. Sheila A. McIlraith, Dimitris Plexousakis, and Frank van Harmelen, editors. The Semantic Web - ISWC 2004: Third International Semantic Web Conference,Hiroshima, Japan, November 7-11, 2004. Proceedings, volume 3298 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2004.
13. N. F. Noy and M. Klein. Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. In SMI technical report SMI-2002-0926, 2002.
14. Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Patrick Hayes, and Ian Horrocks. Owl web ontology language semantics and abstract syntax. http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC- owl-semantics-20040210/.
15. Randel J. Peters and M. Tamer Özsu. An axiomatic model of dynamic schema evolution in objectbase systems. ACM Trans. Database Syst., 22(1):75-114, 1997.
16. John F. Roddick. A survey of schema versioning issues for database systems. Information and Software Technology, 37(7):383-393, 1995.
17. L. Stojanovic, A. Abecker, N. Stojanovic, and R. Studer. On managing changes in the ontology-based e-goverament. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Application of Semantics (ODBASE 2004), number 3291 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1080-1097, Agia Napa, Cyprus, November 2004. Springer Verlag.
18. Ljiljana Stojanovic. Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe, 2004.
19. Raphael Volz. Web Ontology Reasoning with Logic Databases. PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe, 2004.
20. Christopher A. Welty and Nicola Guarino. Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data Knowledge Engineering, 39(1):51-74, 2001.