Did youth smoking behaviors change before and after the shutdown of Minnesota Youth Tobacco Prevention Initiative?

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1196-1204

  Alesci, Nina L ^a   Forster, Jean L ^a   Erickson, Darin J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT SMOKING; AGE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; CHILD; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SMOKING CESSATION; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SMOKING HABIT; TAX; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIOR THERAPY; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; MINNESOTA; PREVALENCE; SMOKING; TOBACCO;

EID: 70349548574     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntp124     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. American Legacy Foundation. (2008). What we do. Retrieved 1 September, 2008, from http://www.americanlegacy.org/whatwedo.aspx
2. Bauer, U. E., Johnson, T. M., Hopkins, R. S., & Brooks, R. G. (2000). Changes in youth cigarette use and intentions following implementation of a tobacco control program: Findings from the Florida Youth Tobacco Survey, 1998-2000. Journal of the American Medical Association, 284 723-728.
3. Biener, L., Harris, J. E., & Hamilton, W. (2000). Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: Population based trend analysis. British Medical Journal, 321, 351-354.
4. Bonnie, R. J., Stratton, K., & Wallace, R. B. (Eds.) (2007). Ending the tobacco problem: A blueprint for the nation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5. Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2006). Latent curve models: A structural equation perspective. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.
6. California Department of Health Services. (1998). A model for change: The California experiment in tobacco control. Sacramento: Tobacco Control Section, California Department of Health Services.
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1999). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs - August 1999 (Vol. reprinted, with corrections). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2004). Effect of ending an antitobacco youth campaign on adolescent susceptibility to cigarette smoking - Minnesota, 2002-2003. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 301-304.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2006). Targeting tobacco use: The nation's leading cause of death. Retrieved 4 September 2006, from www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/publications/aag/osh.htm
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2007). Best practices for comprehensive tobacco control programs - 2007 (Vol. reprinted with corrections). Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking or Health.
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2008). Trends in the prevalence of tobacco use, National Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance Survey: 1991-2007. Retrieved 21 June 2008, from www.cdc.gov/ HealthyYouth/yrbs/pdf/yrbs07_us_tobacco_use_trend.pdf
12. Chen, X., Li, G., Unger, J. B., Liu, X., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Secular trends in adolescent never smoking from 1990 to 1999 in California: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 2099-2104.
13. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Strycker, L. A. (2006). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Farrelly, M. C., Pechacek, T. F., Thomas, K. Y., & Nelson, D. (2008). The impact of tobacco control programs on adult smoking. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 304-309.
15. Fichtenberg, C. M., & Glantz, S. A. (2000). Association of the California Tobacco Control Program with declines in cigarette consumption and mortality from heart disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 343, 1772-1777.
16. Glantz, S. A. (1993). Changes in cigarette consumption, prices, and tobacco industry revenues associated with California's Proposition 99. Tobacco Control, 2, 311-314.
17. Hopkins, D. P., Briss, P. A., Ricard, C. J., Husten, C. G., Carande-Kulis, V. G., Fielding, J. E., et al. (2001). Reviews of evidence regarding interventions to reduce tobacco use and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 20(Suppl. 2), 16-66.
18. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2008). Monitoring the Future: National results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2007. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
19. Kuiper, N. M., Nelson, D. E., & Schooley, M. (2005). Evidence of effectiveness: A summary of state tobacco control program evaluation literature. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
20. Mayhew, K. P., Flay, B. R., & Mott, J. A. (2000). Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 59 (Suppl. 1), S61-S81.
21. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
22. Minnesota Department of Health. (2001). Tobacco use prevention and local public health endowment. Report to the Minnesota Legislature. St. Paul:MInnesota Department of Health.
23. Minnesota Department of Health. (2002). Tobacco use prevention and local public health endowment. Report to the Minnesota Legislature: 2001 activities. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Health.
24. Minnesota Department of Health. (2003). Tobacco use prevention and local public health endowment. Report to the Minnesota Legislature: 2002 activities. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Health.
25. Minnesota Department of Health. (2005a). Changes in tobacco use by Minnesota youth, 2000-2005: Results from the Minnesota Youth Tobacco Survey. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Health.
26. Minnesota Department of Health. (2005b). Tobacco use prevention: Report to the legislature on 2003-2004 activities. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Health.
27. Murray, D. M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Muthén, B. O. (2004). Statistical analysis with latent variables, growth modeling. Podcast Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/seminars/ed231e/default.htm
29. Muthén, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). Complex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological Methodology, 25, 267-316.
30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). MPlus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
31. Niederdeppe, J., Farrelly, M. C., Hersey, J. C., & Davis, K. C. (2008). Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998-2000. Tobacco Control, 17, 205-210.
32. Orzechowski, W., & Walker, R. C. (2007). Tax burden on tobacco: Historical compilation, Volume 42. Arlington, VA: Orzechowski & Walker.
33. Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E. A., Emery, S. L., White, M. M., Rosbrook, B., Berry, C. C., et al. (1998). Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking? Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 893-899.
34. Pierce, J. P., White, M. M., & Gilpin, E. A. (2005). Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme. Tobacco Control, 14, 207-212.
35. Pizacani, B. A., Dent, C. W., Maher, J. E., Rohde, K., Stark, M. J., Biglan, A., et al. (2009). Smoking patterns in Oregon youth: Effects of funding and defunding of a comprehensive state tobacco control program. Journal of Adolescent Health, 44, 229-236.
36. Richard, L., Potvin, L., Kishchuk, N., Prlic, H., & Green, L. W. (1996). Assessment of the integration of the ecological approach in health promotion programs. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 318-328.
37. Rose, G. (1985). Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology, 14, 32-38.
38. Sallis, J. F., & Owen, N. (2002). Ecological models of health behavior. In K. Glanz, B. K. Rimer, and F. M. Lewis (Eds.), Health behavior and health education (3rd ed., pp. 462-484). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
39. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
40. Siegel, M. (2002). The effectiveness of state-level tobacco control interventions: A review of program implementation and behavioral outcomes. Annual Review of Public Health, 23, 45-71.
41. Simons-Morton, B., Chen, R., Abroms, L., & Haynie, D. L. (2004). Latent growth curve analyses of peer and parent influences on smoking progression among early adolescents. Health Psychology, 23, 612-621.
42. Soldz, S., Clark, T. W., Stewart, E., Celebucki, C., & Klein Walker, D. (2002). Decreased youth tobacco use in Massachusetts 1996 to 1999: Evidence of tobacco control effectiveness. Tobacco Control, 11 (Suppl. 2), ii14-ii19.
43. Starr, G., Rogers, T., Schooley, M., Wiesen, E., & Jamison, N. (2005). Key outcome indicators for measuring comprehensive tobacco control programs. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
44. Ullman, J. B. (2001). Structural equation modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick and L. S. Fidell (Eds.), Using multivariate statistics (4th ed., pp. 653-771). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
45. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994). Preventing tobacco use among young people: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
46. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Reducing tobacco use: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
47. Wakefield, M., & Chaloupka, F. J. (2000). Effectiveness of comprehensive tobacco control programmes in reducing teenage smoking in the USA. Tobacco Control, 9, 177-186.
48. Wilcox, P. (2003). An ecological approach to understanding youth smoking trajectories: Problems and prospects. Addiction, 98(Suppl. 1), 57-77.