Taxonomic implications of morphological variation in cercis canadensis (Fabaceae) from Mexico and adjacent parts of Texas

Systematic Botany

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 510-520

  Fritsch, Peter W ^a   Schiller, Anja M ^a   Larson, Keith W ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (United States)

^b LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Cline; Elliptic fourier analysis; Morphometrics; Redbud; Taxonomy

Indexed keywords

CERCIS; CERCIS CANADENSIS; FABACEAE; PECOS;

EID: 70349486035     PISSN: 03636445     EISSN: 15482324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1600/036364409789271254     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson, E. A. 1953. Introgressive hybridization. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 23: 280-307.
2. Ballenger, J. A. 1992. A biosystematic revision of the genus Cercis L. (Leguminosae) in North America. Ph.D. Thesis. Miami, Ohio: Miami University.
3. Blackman, G. E. and G. L. Wilson. 1951. Physiological and ecological studies in the analysis of plant environment. Annals of Botany 23: 131-145.
4. Correll, D. S. and M. C. Johnston. 1979. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Richardson: University of Texas at Dallas.
5. Davis, C. C., P. W. Fritsch, J. Li, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Phylogeny and biogeography of Cercis (Fabaceae): evidence from nuclear ribo-somal ITS and chloroplast ndhF sequence data. Systematic Botany 27: 289-302.
6. Dean, J. M. and A. P. Smith. 1978. Behavioral and morphological adaptations of a tropical plant to high rainfall. Biotropica 10: 152-154.
7. Donselman, H. M. and H. L. Flint. 1982. Genecology of eastern redbud (Cercis canadensis). Ecology 63: 962-971.
8. ESRI. 1992-2002. ArcView v. 3.3. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
9. ESRI. 1999-2006 ArcGIS v. 9 2 Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
10. Feng, Y., S.-H. Oh, and P. S. Manos 2005. Phylogeny and historical biogeography of the genus Platanus as inferred from nuclear and chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany 30: 786-799.
11. Ferson, S., F. J. Rohlf, and R. K. Koehn. 1985. Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology 34: 59-68.
12. Freeman, H. 1974. Computer processing of line-drawing images. Computing Surveys 6: 57-97.
13. Fritsch, P. W. 1996. Isozyme analysis of intercontinental disjuncts within Styrax (Styracaceae): implications for the Madrean-Tethyan hypothesis. American Journal of Botany 83: 342-355.
14. Fritsch, P. W. 1997. A revision of Styrax (Styracaceae) for western Texas, Mexico, and Mesoamerica. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 705-761.
15. Fritsch, P. W. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of the flowering plant genus Styrax (Styracaceae) based on chloroplast DNA restriction sites and DNA sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 19: 387-408.
16. Furata, N., S. Ninomiya, S. Takahashi, H. Ohmori, and Y. Ukai. 1995. Quantitative evaluation of soybean (Glycine max L., Merr.) leaf-let shape by principal component scores based on elliptic Fourier descriptor. Breeding Science 45: 315-320.
17. Givnish, T. J. 1979. On the adaptive significance of leaf form. Pp. 375-407 in Topics in plant population biology, eds. O. T. Solbrig, S., Jain, G. B. Johnson, and P. H. Raven. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Graham, A. 1999a. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Graham, A. 1999b. The Tertiary history of the northern temperate element in the northern Latin American biota. American Journal of Botany 86: 32-38.
20. Hammer, Ø., D. A. T. Harper, and P. D. Ryan. 2001. PAST: paleonto-logical statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 9 pp. http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm.
21. Hopkins, M. 1942. Cercis in North America. Rhodora 44: 192-211.
22. Isely, D. 1975. Leguminosae of the United States: II. Subfamily Caesalpinioideae. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 25: 1-228.
23. Iwata, H. and Y. Ukai. 2002. SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. The Journal of Heredity 93: 384-385.
24. Jenness, J. 2004. Nearest features (nearfeat.avx) extension for ArcView 3.x v. 3.8a. Flagstaff, Arizona: Jenness Enterprises. Available at: http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/nearest_features.htm.
25. Jensen, R. J., K. M. Ciofani, and L. C. Miramontes. 2002. Lines, outlines, and landmarks: morphometric analyses of leaves of Acer rubrum, Acer saccharinum (Aceraceae) and their hybrid. Taxon 51: 475-492.
26. Kuhl, F. P. and C. R. Giardina. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics Image Processing 18: 236-258.
27. Manos, P. S. and A. M. Stanford. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162(Supplement): S77-S93.
28. McVaugh, R. 1952. Suggested phylogeny of Prunus serotina and other wide-ranging phylads in North America. Brittonia 7: 317-346.
29. Morris, A. B., M. A. Gitzendanner, D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis. 2004. Phylogeographic structure in Liquidambar styraciflua (Altingiaceae). Abstract, Botany 2004, http://www.2004.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=637.
30. Morris, A. B., S. M. Ickert-Bond, A. R. Bigger, D. E. Soltis, and P. S. Soltis. 2007. Phylogeographic complexity and pre-Pleistocene breaks within Liquidambar styraciflua. Abstract, Botany 2007, http://www.2007.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func=detail&aid=1852.
31. Neto, J. C., G. E. Meyer, D. D. Jones, and A. K. Samal. 2006. Plant species identification using elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 50: 121-134.
32. Nixon, K. C. and J. M. Poole. 2003. Revision of the Mexican and Guate-malan species of Platanus (Platanaceae). Lundellia 6: 103-137.
33. Olsson, Å., H. Nybom, and H. C. Prentice. 2000. Relationships between Nordic dogroses (Rosa L. sect. Caninae, Rosaceae) assessed by RAPDs and elliptic Fourier analysis of leaflet shape. Systematic Botany 25: 511-521.
34. Persson, H. A. and B. A. Gustavsson. 2001. The extent of clonality and genetic diversity in lingonberry (V accinium vitis-idaea L.) revealed by RAPDs and leaf-shape analysis. Molecular Ecology 10: 1385-1397.
35. Rumpunen, K. and I. V. Bartish. 2002. Comparison of differentiation estimates based on morphometric and molecular data, exemplified by various leaf shape descriptors and RAPDs in the genus Chaenomeles (Rosaceae). Taxon 51: 69-82.
36. Rzedowski, J. R. and G. Calderón de Rzedowski. 1997. Flora del Bajío de regiones adyacentes fasc. 51. Familia Leguminosae subfamilia Caesalpinioideae. Pátzcuaro, México: Instituto de Ecologia A. C. Centro Regional del Bajío.
37. Turner, B. L., H. Nichols, G. Denny, and O. Doron. 2003. Atlas of the vascular plants of Texas vol. 1. Sida Botanical Miscellany 24.