Evaluation of restoration measures in a shallow lake through a comparison of present day zooplankton communities with historical samples

Restoration Ecology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 629-640

  Louette, Gerald ^a   Declerck, Steven ^b   Vandekerkhove, Jochen ^c   De Meester, Luc ^b  

^a RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

Author keywords

Biomanipulation; Cladocera; Community ecology; Conservation biology; Restoration success

Indexed keywords

BIOMANIPULATION; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CRUSTACEAN; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT RESTORATION; LAKE WATER; MACROPHYTE; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SHALLOW WATER; SPECIES RICHNESS; ZOOPLANKTON;

CLADOCERA;

EID: 70349478845     PISSN: 10612971     EISSN: 1526100X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00409.x     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Abrantes N, Antunes S. C, Pereira M. J, Gonçalves F. Seasonal succession of cladocerans and phytoplankton and their interactions in a shallow eutrophic lake (Lake Vela, Portugal). Acta Oecologica 2006, 29:54-64.
2. Anderson N. J, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M. Ecological effects of reduced nutrient loading (oligotrophication) on lakes: an introduction. Freshwater Biology 2005, 50:1589-1593.
3. Angeler D. G, García G. Using emergence from soil propagule banks as indicators of ecological integrity in wetlands: advantages and limitations. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 2005, 24:740-752.
4. Binks J. A, Arnott S. E, Sprules W. G. Local factors and colonist dispersal influence crustacean zooplankton recovery from cultural acidification. Ecological Applications 2005, 15:2025-2036.
5. Brouwer E, Roelofs J. G. M. Degraded softwater lakes: possibilities for restoration. Restoration Ecology 2001, 9:155-166.
6. Cottenie K, De Meester L. Metacommunity structure: synergy of biotic interactions as selective agents and dispersal as fuel. Ecology 2004, 85:114-119.
7. Declerck S, Vandekerkhove J, Johansson L, Muylaert K, Conde-Porcuna J. M, Van der Gucht K. Multi-group biodiversity in shallow lakes along gradients of phosphorus and water plant cover. Ecology 2005, 86:1905-1915. et al
8. Declerck S, Vanderstukken M, Pals A, Muylaert K, De Meester L. Plankton biodiversity along a gradient of productivity and its mediation by macrophytes. Ecology 2007, 88:2199-2210.
9. DeMott W. R. Relations between filter mesh-size, feeding mode, and capture efficiency from cladocerans feeding on ultrafine particles. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Beiheft Ergebnisse der Limnologie 1985, 21:125-134.
10. Dorland E, Hart M. A. C, Vermeer M. L, Bobbink R. Assessing the success of wet heath restoration by combined sod cutting and liming. Applied Vegetation Science 2005, 8:209-218.
11. Flössner D. Die Haplopoda und Cladocera (ohne Bosminidae) Mitteleuropas 2000, Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands
12. Fischer J. M, Klug J. L, Ives A. R, Frost T. M. Ecological history affects zooplankton community responses to acidification. Ecology 2001, 82:2984-3000.
13. Frost T. M, Fischer J. M, Klug J. L, Arnott S. E, Montz P. K. Trajectories of zooplankton recovery in the Little Rock Lake whole-lake acidification experiment. Ecological Applications 2006, 16:353-367.
14. Gliwicz Z. M. Food thresholds and body size in cladocerans. Nature 1990, 343:638-640.
15. Hart R. C. Comparative long-term periodicity of Diaphanosoma excisum in adjacent warm-water impoundments, with an evaluation of contributory factors. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 2000, 27:1933-1939.
16. Hosper S. H, Meijer M.-L. Biomanipulation, will it work for your lake? A simple test for the assessment of chances for clear water, following drastic fish stock reduction in shallow, eutrophic lakes. Ecological Engineering 1993, 2:63-72.
17. Hoste I. Historiek van de Kraenepoel (Aalter, Oost-Vlaanderen) met inbegrip van de ontwikkeling van flora en vegetatie in de 19de en 20ste eeuw. Rapport in het kader van het project LIFE98NAT/B/5172 2001, Nationale Plantentuin van België, Meise, Belgium
18. James W. F, Barko J. W, Eakin H. L. Impacts of sediment dewatering and rehydration on sediment nitrogen concentration and macrophyte growth. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2004, 61:538-546.
19. Jeppesen E, Jensen J. P, Kristensen P, Søndergaard M, Mortensen E, Sortkjær O, Olrik K. Fish manipulation as a lake restoration tool in shallow, eutrophic temperate lakes. 2: threshold levels, long-term stability and conclusions. Hydrobiologia 1990, 200/201:219-227.
20. Jeppesen E, Jensen J. P, Søndergaard M, Lauridsen T, Landkildehus F. Trophic structure, species richness and biodiversity in Danish lakes: changes along a phosphorus gradient. Freshwater Biology 2000, 45:201-218.
21. Jeppesen E, Lauridsen T, Kairesalo T, Perrow M. R, Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Søndergaard M, Cristoffersen K. Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. The structuring role of submerged macrophytes in lakes. Ecological Studies 1998a, 91-114. Pages, in, editors, Springer Verlag, New York
22. Jeppesen E, Søndergaard M, Jensen J. P, Mortensen E, Hansen A.-M, Jørgensen T. Cascading trophic interactions from fish to bacteria and nutrients after reduced sewage loading: an 18-year study of a shallow hypertrophic lake. Ecosystems 1998b, 1:250-267.
23. Keller W, Yan N. D. Biological recovery from lake acidification: zooplankton communities as a model of patterns and processes. Restoration Ecology 1998, 6:364-375.
24. Keller W, Yan N. D, Somers K. M, Heneberry J. H. Crustacean zooplankton communities in lakes recovering from acidification. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2002, 59:726-735.
25. Kyle M, Acharya K, Weider L. J, Looper K, Elser J. J. Coupling of growth rate and body stoichiometry in Daphnia: a role for maintenance processes?. Freshwater Biology 2006, 51:2087-2095.
26. Louette G, De Meester L. High dispersal capacity of cladoceran zooplankton in newly founded communities. Ecology 2005, 86:353-359.
27. Louette G, Vander Elst M, De Meester L. Establishment success in young cladoceran communities: an experimental test. Limnology and Oceanography 2006, 51:1021-1030.
28. Louette G, De Bie T, Vandekerkhove J, Declerck S, De Meester L. Analysis of the inland cladocerans of Flanders (Belgium)-inferring changes over the past 70 years. Belgian Journal of Zoology 2007, 137:117-123.
29. Luyten M. Over de oecologie der Cladocera van België. Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea 1934, 25:33-179.
30. McCauley E, Downing J. A, Rigler F. H. The estimation of the abundance and biomass of zooplankton in samples. A manual on methods for the assessment of secondary productivity in fresh waters 1984, 228-265. Pages, in, editors, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, United Kingdom
31. Meijer M.-L, de Boois I, Scheffer M, Portielje R, Hosper H. Biomanipulation in shallow lakes in The Netherlands: an evaluation of 18 case studies. Hydrobiologia 1999, 408/409:13-30.
32. Moss B, Stansfield J, Irvine K, Perrow M, Phillips G. Progressive restoration of a shallow lake: a 12-year experiment in isolation, sediment removal and biomanipulation. Journal of Applied Ecology 1996, 33:71-86.
33. Moss B, Barker T, Stephen D, Williams A. E, Balayla D. J, Beklioglu M, Carvalho L. Consequences of reduced nutrient loading on a lake system in a lowland catchment: deviations from the norm?. Freshwater Biology 2005, 50:1687-1705.
34. Pollard H. G, Colbourne J. K, Keller W. B. Reconstruction of centuries-old Daphnia communities in a lake recovering from acidification and metal contamination. Ambio 2003, 32:214-218.
35. Ruiz-Jaen M. C, Aide T. M. Restoration success: how is it being measured?. Restoration Ecology 2005, 13:569-577.
36. Sarnelle O, Knapp R. A. Zooplankton recovery after fish removal: limitations of the egg bank. Limnology and Oceanography 2004, 49:1382-1392.
37. Scheffer M, Hosper S. H, Meijer M.-L, Moss B, Jeppesen E. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1993, 8:275-278.
38. Electronic statistics textbook 2004, StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma
39. Stich H. B. Back again: the reappearance of Diaphanosoma brachyurum in Lake Constance. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 2004, 159:423-431.
40. ter Braak C. J. F, Smilauer P. CANOCO for windows. Biometris-Plant Research International 2002, Wageningen, The Netherlands
41. Urabe J. Effect of a zooplankton community on seston elimination in a restored pond in Japan. Restoration Ecology 1994, 2:61-70.
42. Vandekerkhove J, Declerck S, Brendonck L, Conde-Porcuna J. M, Jeppesen E, Johansson L. S, De Meester L. Uncovering hidden species: hatching resting eggs for the analysis of cladoceran species richness. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 2005a, 3:399-407.
43. Vandekerkhove J, Louette G, Brendonck L, De Meester L. Development of cladoceran egg banks in new and isolated pools. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 2005b, 162:339-347.
44. Vander Meersch E. Notice sur la florule du Kraene-Poel. Bulletin de la Société Royale de Botanique de Belgique 1874, 13:224-241.
45. Van Oye P. Etude biologique des Desmidiées de l'étang du Kraenepoel (Belgique). Biologisch Jaarboek Dodonaea 1941, 8:173-293.
46. Van Wichelen J, Declerck S, Muylaert K, Hoste I, Geenens V, Vandekerkhove J. The importance of drawdown and sediment removal for the restoration of the eutrophied shallow Lake Kraenepoel (Belgium). Hydrobiologia 2007, 584:291-303. et al
47. Vrba J, Kopáček J, Fott J, Kohout L, Nedbalová L, Pražáková M, Soldán T, Schaumburg J. on acidification and recovery of lakes in the Bohemian Forest (central Europe). The Science of the Total Environment 1871-2000, 310:73-85.
48. Yan N. D, Leung B, Keller W, Arnott S. E, Gunn J. M, Raddum G. G. Developing conceptual frameworks for the recovery of aquatic biota from acidification. Ambio 2003, 32:165-169.
49. Yan N. D, Girard R, Heneberry J. H, Keller W. B, Dillon P. J. Recovery of copepod, but not cladoceran, zooplankton from severe and chronic effects of multiple stressors. Ecology Letters 2004, 7:452-460.