Differences in wear between load and displacement control tested total knee replacements

Wear

Volumn 267, Issue 5-8, 2009, Pages 757-762

  Schwenke, T ^a   Orozco, D ^a   Schneider, E ^a   Wimmer, M A ^a  

^a RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Control mode; Implant wear; Simulator testing; Total knee arthroplasty; UHMWPE

Indexed keywords

CONTROL MODE; IMPLANT WEAR; SIMULATOR TESTING; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UHMWPE;

IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOINTS (ANATOMY); LOADS (FORCES); SIMULATORS; TROPICAL ENGINEERING; ULTRAHIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENES;

JOINT PROSTHESES;

EID: 65749094059     PISSN: 00431648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kurtz S., Lau E., Mowat F., Ong K., and Halpern M. The future burden of hip and knee revisions: US projections from 2005 to 2030. AAOS, 73rd Annual Meeting. Chicago, IL, USA (2006)
2. Robertsson O., Knutson K., Lewold S., and Lidgren L. The swedish knee arthroplasty register 1975-1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988-1997. Acta Orthop. Scand. 72 5 (2001) 503-513
3. ISO 14243-1, Implants for surgery-wear of total knee-joint prostheses. Part 1. Loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for test, 2002.
4. ISO 14243-2, Implants for surgery-wear of total knee joint prosthesis. Part 3. Loading and displacement parameters for wear testing machines with displacement control and corresponding environmental conditions for tests, 2001.
5. Bartel D.L., Rawlinson J.J., Burstein A.H., Ranawat C.S., and Flynn W.F. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 317 (1995) 76-82
6. Kuster M.S., Horz S., Spalinger E., Stachowiak G.W., and Gachter A. The effects of conformity and load in total knee replacement. Clin. Orthop. 375 (2000) 302-312
7. Rawlinson J., Furman B., Li S., and Bartel D. Finite element analysis of TKR captures device-dependent kinematics and wear potential. ORS, 48th Annual Meeting. Dallas, USA (2002)
8. Sathasivam S., and Walker P.S. Computer model to predict subsurface damage in tibial inserts of total knees. J. Orthop. Res. 16 5 (1998) 564-571
9. Haider H., and Walker P.S. Analysis and recommendations for the optimum spring configurations for soft tissue restraint in force-control knee simulator testing. ORS, 48th Annual Meeting. Dallas, USA (2002)
10. ISO 14243-2, Implants for surgery-wear of total knee-joint prostheses. Part 2. Methods of measurement, 2000.
11. Barnett P.I., Fisher J., Auger D.D., Stone M.H., and Ingham E. Comparison of wear in a total knee replacement under different kinematic conditions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 12 10-12 (2001) 1039-1042
12. Haider H., Alberts L.R., Laurent M.P., Johnson T.S., Yao J., Gilbertson L.N., and Walker P.S. Comparison between force-controlled in-vivo wear testing on a widely used TKR implant. ORS, 49th Annual Meeting. Dallas, USA (2002)
13. Wimmer M.A., Paul P., Haman J., Schwenke T., Rosenberg A.G., and Jacobs J.J. Differences in damage between revision and postmortem retrieved TKA implants. 51th Annual Meeting, ORS. Washington, USA (2005)
14. Benson L.C., DesJardins J.D., Harman M.K., and LaBerge M. Effect of stair descent loading on ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear in a force-controlled knee simulator. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H] 216 (2002) 409-418
15. Johnson T.S., Yao J.Q., Laurent M.P., Blanchard C.R., and Crowninshield R.D. Implementation of multiple activities of daily living for knee wear testing. 7th World Biomaterials Congress. Sydney, Australia (2004)