Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict residual disease in breast cancer?

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 198, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 547-552

  Stucky, Chee Chee H ^a   McLaughlin, Sarah A ^b   Dueck, Amylou C ^a   Gray, Richard J ^a   Giurescu, Marina E ^a   Carpenter, Susanne G ^a   Grimsby, Gwen M ^a   Apsey, Heidi A ^a   Pockaj, Barbara A ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast conservation therapy (BCT); Invasive breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Positive margins; re excision; Residual disease

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CONSERVATION THERAPY; BREAST SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;

EID: 70349467873     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Saslow D., Boetes C., Burke W., et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 57 (2007) 75-89
2. Singh V., Saunders C., Wylie L., et al. New diagnostic techniques for breast cancer detection. Futures Oncol 4 (2008) 501-513
3. Sinha S., and Sinha U. Recent advances in breast MRI and MRS. NMR Biomed 22 (2009) 3-16
4. Cooney C.S., Khouri N.F., and Tsangaris T.N. The role of breast MRI in the management of patients with breast disease. Adv Surg 42 (2008) 299-312
5. Fisher B., Jeong J.H., Anderson S., et al. Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 567-575
6. Poggi M.M., Danforth D.N., Sciuto L.C., et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: the National Cancer Institute randomized trial. Cancer 98 (2003) 697-702
7. Veronesi U., Cascinelli N., Mariani L., et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347 (2002) 1227-1232
8. Wright M.J., Park J., Fey J.V., et al. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: does the method matter?. J Am Coll Surg 204 (2007) 541-549
9. Cabioglu N., Hunt K.K., Sahin A.A., et al. Role of intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007) 1458-1471
10. Punglia R.S., Morrow M., Winer E.P., et al. Local therapy and survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356 (2007) 2399-2405
11. Smitt M.C., Nowels K., Carlson R.W., et al. Predictors of reexcision findings and recurrence after breast conservation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2003) 979-985
12. Tartter P.I., Kaplan J., Bleweiss I., et al. Lumpectomy margins, reexcision, and local recurrence of breast cancer. Am J Surg 179 (2000) 81-85
13. Wazer D.E., Schmidt-Ulrich R.K., Schmid C.H., et al. The value of breast lumpectomy margin assessment as a predictor of residual tumor burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 38 (1997) 291-299
14. Singletary S.E. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy. Am J Surg 184 (2002) 383-393
15. Sabel M.S., Rogers K., Griffith K., et al. Residual disease after re-excision lumpectomy for close margins. J Surg Oncol 99 (2009) 99-103
16. Aziz D., Rawlinson E., Narod S.A., et al. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Breast J 12 (2006) 331-337
17. Jardines L., Fowble B., Schultz D., et al. Factors associated with a positive reexcision after excisional biopsy for invasive breast cancer. Surgery 118 (1995) 803-809
18. Schnall M.D., Blume J., Bluemke D.A., et al. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study. Radiology 238 (2006) 2-53
19. Preda L., Villa G., Rizzo S., et al. Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy. Breast Cancer Res 8 (2006) R53
20. Aref A., Youssef E., Washington T., et al. The value of postlumpectomy mammogram in the management of breast cancer patients presenting with suspicious microcalcifications. Cancer J Sci Am 6 (2000) 25-27
21. Waddell B.E., Stomper P.C., DeFazio J.L., et al. Postexcision mammography is indicated after resection of ductal carcinoma in-situ of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 7 (2000) 665-668
22. Lee J.M., Orel S.G., Czerniecki B.J., et al. MRI before reexcision surgery in patients with breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 182 (2004) 473-480
23. Frei K.A., Kinkel K., Bonel H.M., et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175 (2000) 1577-1584
24. Soderstrom C.E., Harms S.E., Farrell R.S., et al. Detection with MR imaging of residual tumor in the breast soon after surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168 (1997) 485-488
25. Orel S.G., Reynolds C., Schnall M.D., et al. Breast carcinoma: MR imaging before re-excisional biopsy. Radiology 205 (1997) 429-436
26. Delille J.P., Slanetz P.J., Yeh E.D., et al. Physiologic changes in breast magnetic resonance imaging during the menstrual cycle: perfusion imaging, signal enhancement, and influence of the T1 relaxation time of breast tissue. Breast J 11 (2005) 236-241