A comparison of radial and axial flux structures in electrical machines

2009 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference, IEMDC '09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1029-1035

  Patterson, Dean J ^a,c   Colton, Jessica L ^a   Mularcik, Brad ^b   Kennedy, Byron J ^c   Camilleri, Steven ^c   Rohoza, Rafal ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b TIMKEN COMPANY   (United States)

^c Fasco Australia P/L   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE MATERIAL; AIR-GAPS; AXIAL FLUX; COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE; ELECTRIC LOADING; ELECTRICAL MACHINE; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MAGNETIC LOADING; NEW MATERIAL; PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MACHINES; RADIAL FLUX;

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; ELECTRIC MACHINERY; MAGNETS; STRESS ANALYSIS;

ELECTRIC DRIVES;

EID: 70349466823     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/IEMDC.2009.5075331     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Zhang, Z., Profumo, F., Tenconi, A., Axial-flux versus radial-flux permanent-magnet motors. Electromotion., 1996, vol 3, 134-140.
2. Huang, S., Aydin, M., Lipo, T.A., TORUS Concept Machines: Pre-Prototyping Design Assessment for Two Major Topologies, Proceedings, Industry Application Society Annual Meeting 2001, IAS '01, Chicago, USA
3. Huang, S., Jian, L., Leonardi, F., Lipo, T.A., A Comparison of Power Density for Axial Flux Machines Based on General Purpose Sizing Equations, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, Vol 14, No.2, June 1999
4. Simsir, N. B., Ertran, H. B., A Comparison of Torque Capabilities of Axial Flux and Radial Flux Type of Brushless DC (BLDC) Drives for Wide Speed Range Applications, IEEE 1999 International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, PEDS'99, July 1999, Hong Kong.
5. Huang, S., Aydin, M., Lipo, T.A., Low Noise and Smooth Permanent Magnet Propulsion Mootrs: Comparison of Non-Slotted and Slotted Radial and Axial Flux Topologies, IEEE International Aegean Electrical Machine and Power Electronic Conference, Kusadasi, Turkey, 2001, pp 1-8.
6. Sitapati, K., Krishnan, K., Performance Comparisons of Radial and Axial Field, Permanent Magnet, Brushless Machines, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 37, No. 5, Sept./Oct. 2001.
7. Cavignino, A., Lazzari, M., Profumo, F., Tenconi, A., A Comparison Between the Axial Flux and the Radial Flux Structures for PM Synchronous Motors., IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol 38, No. 6, November/December 2002.
8. Rahman, Z., Evaluating Radial, Axial and Transverse Flux Topologies for 'In-Wheel' Motors, IEEE Power Electronics in transportation 2004, pg 75-81.
9. Parviainen, A., Niemela, M., Pyrhonen, J., Mantere, J., Performance comparison between low-speed axial-flux and radial-flux permanent magnet machines including mechanical constraints, IEEE International Conference on Electric Machines and Drives, May 2005, pages 1695-1702.
10. Akatsu, K., Wakui, S., A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics, COMPEL: The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Vol. 25, No.2, pages 496-509, 2006.