A comparison between axial and radial flux PM motor by optimum design method from the required output NT characteristics

COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 496-509

  Akatsu, K ^a   Wakui, S ^a  

^a TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Flux; Magnetic devices; Optimum design

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; MACHINE DESIGN; MAGNETIC DEVICES; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC HYSTERESIS; MAGNETIC PERMEABILITY; STATORS; TORQUE;

FLUX; OPTIMUM DESIGN; PERMEANCE METHODS; RADIAL FLUX;

ELECTRIC MOTORS;

EID: 33645510447     PISSN: 03321649     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/03321640610649159     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Cavagnino, A., Lazzari, M., Profumo, M. and Tenconi, A. (2002), "A comparison between the axial flux and the radial flux structures for PM synchronous motors", IEEE Trans. on Ind. App., Vol. 38 No. 6, pp. 1517-24.
2. Gieras, J.F. and Wing, M. (1996), Permanent Magnet Motor Technology, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
3. Hung, S., Luo, J., Leonardi, F. and Lipo, T.A. (1999), "A comparison of power density for axial flux machines based on general purpose sizing equations", IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 185-92.
4. Morimoto, S. and Takeda, Y. (1997), "Generalized analysis of operating limits of PM motor and suitable machine parameters for constant power operation", Trans. IEE Japan, Vol. 117-D No. 6, pp. 751-7.
5. Morimoto, S., Yuge, Y., Takeda, Y. and Hirasa, T. (1990), "Motor parameters and operating limits of PM motor", Trans. IEE Japan, Vol. 110-D No. 11, pp. 1171-6.
6. Takano, H., Itoh, T., Mori, K., Sakuta, A. and Hirasa, T. (1992), "Optimum values for magnet and armature winding thickness for axial-field permanent magnet brushless DC motors", IEEE Trans. on Ind. App., Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. 350-7.