Web mining for event-based commonsense knowledge using lexico-syntactic pattern matching and semantic role labeling

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 341-347

  Hung, Sheng Hao ^a   Lin, Chia Hung ^b   Hong, Jen Shin ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Commonsense knowledge retrieval; Event based knowledge; Is capable of; Semantic role labeling; Web mining

Indexed keywords

COMMONSENSE KNOWLEDGE RETRIEVAL; EVENT-BASED KNOWLEDGE; IS CAPABLE OF; SEMANTIC ROLE LABELING; WEB MINING;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; LABELING; PATTERN MATCHING; SEMANTICS; SYNTACTICS;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 70349466200     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.060     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ACE (2003). Automatic content extraction. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: http://www.nist.gov/speech/tests/ace, last visited at: January 17th 2008.
2. Ahlswede, T., & Evens M. (1988). Parsing vs. text processing in the analysis of dictionary definitions. In Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 217-224).
3. Alshawi H. Processing dictionary definitions with phrasal pattern hierarchies. American Journal of Computational Linguistics 13 3 (1987) 195-202
4. Aone, C., & Ramos-Santacruz, M. (2000). REES: A large-scale relation and event extraction system. In Proceedings of the sixth conference on applied natural language processing (pp. 76-83). Seattle, Washington.
5. Berland, M., & Charniak, E. (2002). Finding parts in very large corpora. In Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 57-64).
6. Byrd J.R., Calzolari N., Chodorov S.M., Klavans L.J., Neff S.M., and Rizk O. Tools and methods for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics 13 3/4 (1987) 219-240
7. Cederberg, S., & Widdows, D. (2003). Using LSA and noun coordination information to improve the precision and recall of automatic hyponymy extraction. In Conference on natural language learning (CoNLL2003) (pp. 111-118).
8. Creswell, C., Beal, J. M., Chen, J., Cornell, L. T., Nilsson, L., & Srihari K. R. (2006). Automatically extracting nominal mentions of events with a bootstrapped probabilistic classifier. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 main conference poster sessions (pp. 168-175).
9. Etzioni O., Cafarella M., Downey D., Popescu A., Shaked T., Soderland S., et al. Unsupervised named-entity extraction from the Web: An experimental study. Artificial Intelligence 165 1 (2005) 91-134
10. Etzioni, O., Cafarella, M., Downey, D., Kok, S., Popescu, A., Shaked, T., et al. (2004). Web-scale information extraction in KnowItAll. In Proceedings of the 13th international world-wide web conference (pp. 100-110). New York.
11. Filatova, E., & Hatzivassiloglou, V. (2003). Domain-independent detection, extraction, and labeling of atomic events. In Proceedings of the fourth international conference on recent advances in natural language processing (RANLP-2003). Borovets, Bulgaria.
12. Gildea D., and Jurafsky D. Automatic labeling of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 28 3 (2002) 245-288
13. Girju R., Badulescu A., and Moldovan D. Automatic discovery of part-whole relations. Computational Linguistics 32 1 (2006) 83-135
14. Hearst, A. M. (1992). Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. In Proceedings of the 14th conference on computational linguistics (pp. 539-545).
15. Jensen K., and Binot J. Disambiguating prepositional phrase attachments by using online dictionary definitions. Computational Linguistics 13 3/4 (1987) 251-260
16. Kehler, A., Appelt, D., Taylor, L., & Simma, A. (2004). The (non)utility of predicate-argument frequencies for pronoun interpretation. In Proceedings of 2004 North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics annual meeting (pp. 289-296).
17. Klavans, J., Chodorow, M., & Wacholder, N. (1990). From dictionary to knowledge base via taxonomy. In Proceedings of the sixth conference UW centre for the new OED (pp. 110-132).
18. Koomen, P., Punyakanok, V., Roth, D., & Yih, W. (2005). Generalized inference with multiple semantic role labeling systems. In Proceedings of the ninth conference on computational natural language learning (CoNLL2005) (pp. 181-184).
19. Lenat B.D. CYC: A large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. Communications of the ACM 38 11 (1995) 33-38
20. Lenat B.D., and Guha V.R. The evolution of CycL, the Cyc representation language. ACM SIGART Bulletin 2 3 (1991) 84-87
21. Lieberman, H., & Liu, H. (2002). Adaptive linking between text and photos using common sense reasoning. In Conference on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 2-11).
22. Liu, H. (2002). Semantic understanding and commonsense reasoning in an adaptive photo agent. Master of Engineering Thesis. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
23. Liu, H., & Singh, P. (2002). MAKEBELIEVE: Using commonsense knowledge to generate stories. In Proceedings of the 18th national conference on artificial intelligence, AAAI 2002 (pp. 957-958). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
24. Liu, H., Lieberman, H., & Selker, T. (2002). GOOSE: A goal-oriented search engine with commonsense. In Proceedings of the 2002 international conference on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web based systems. Malaga, Spain.
25. Liu, H., Lieberman, H., & Selker, T. (2003). A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge. In Proceedings of the seventh international conference on intelligent user interfaces (IUI 2003) (pp. 125-132). Miami, Florida.
26. Liu H., and Singh P. ConceptNet - A practical commonsense reasoning tool-kit. BT Technology Journal 22 4 (2004) 211-226
27. Markowitz, J., Ahlswede, T., & Evens, M. (1986). Semantically significant patterns in dictionary definitions. In Proceedings of the 24th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 112-119). New York.
28. Miller A.G. WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM 38 11 (1995) 39-41
29. MUC (2008). In Message understanding conference. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at: http://www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/894.02/related_projects/muc/, last visited at: Jan. 17th 2008.
30. Nakamura, J., & Nagao, M. (1988). Extraction of semantic information from an ordinary English dictionary and its evaluation. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on computational linguistics (pp. 459-464). Budapest, Hungry.
31. Ng, V., & Cardie, C. (2002). Improving machine learning approaches to conference resolution. In Proceedings of 40th annual meeting on association for computational linguistics (ACL-02) (pp. 104-111).
32. Palmer M., Kingsbury P., and Gildea D. The proposition bank: An annotated corpus of semantic roles. Computational Linguistics 31 1 (2005) 71-106
33. Ponzetto, P. S., & Strube, M. (2006). Semantic role labeling for conference resolution. In Companion volume of the proceedings of the 11th meeting of the European chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 143-146).
34. Pradhan, S., Ward, W., Hacioglu, K., Martin, H. J. & Jurafsky, D. (2004). Shallow semantic parsing using support vector machines. In Proceedings of the human language technology conference/North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics (pp. 233-240).
35. Propbank (2008). Available at: http://www.cs.rochester.edu/~gildea/PropBank/Sort/, last visited at: Jan. 17th 2008.
36. Richardson, D. S., Dolan, B. W., & Vanderwende, L. (1998). MindNet: Acquiring and structuring semantic information from text. In Proceedings of the 17 international conference on computational linguistics (pp. 1098-1102).
37. Xu, F., Uszkoreit, H., & Li, H. (2006). Automatic event and relation detection with seeds of varying complexity. In Proceedings of the AAAI workshop event extraction and synthesis (pp. 12-17). Boston.