Comparison of particle swarm optimization and dynamic programming for large scale hydro unit load dispatch

Energy Conversion and Management

Volumn 50, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 3007-3014

  Cheng, Chun tian ^a   Liao, Sheng li ^a   Tang, Zi Tian ^a   Zhao, Ming yan ^b  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic programming algorithm; Large scale; Optimization techniques; Particle swarm optimization; Unit load dispatch

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON RESULT; COMPARISON STUDY; CURSE OF DIMENSIONALITY; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM; GENERATING CAPACITY; HYDROPOWER PLANTS; HYDROPOWER STATIONS; INSTALLED CAPACITY; LARGE SCALE; LOAD CAPACITY; LOAD DISPATCH; OPERATION QUALITY; OPTIMAL RESULTS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES; POWER GENERATION SCHEDULING; PSO ALGORITHMS; SAMPLE LOADS; SIMULATION COMPARISON; UNIT LOAD DISPATCH; UPPER STREAM; YANGTZE RIVER;

DYNAMIC POSITIONING; DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; ICE CONTROL; PERCOLATION (SOLID STATE); PROBLEM SOLVING; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

EID: 70349464682     PISSN: 01968904     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2009.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Allen R.B., and Bridgeman S.G. Dynamic programming in hydropower scheduling. J Water Resour Plan Manage 112 3 (1986) 339-353
2. Baltar A.M., and Fontane D.G. Use of multiobjective particle swarm optimization in water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manage 134 3 (2008) 257-265
3. Breton M., Hachem S., and Hammadia A. A decomposition approach for the solution of the unit loading problem in hydroplants. Automatica 38 3 (2002) 477-485
4. Cai J.J., Ma X.Q., Li L.X., and Peng H.P. Chaotic particle swarm optimization for economic dispatch considering the generator constraints. Energy Convers Manage 48 2 (2007) 645-653
5. Chau K.W. A split-step particle swarm optimization algorithm in river stage forecasting. J Hydrol 346 3 (2007) 131-135
6. Cheng C.P., Liu C.W., and Liu C.C. Unit commitment by Lagrangian relaxation and genetic algorithms. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15 2 (2000) 707-714
7. Cohen A.I., and Yoshimura M. A branch-and-bound algorithm for unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Appl Syst 102 2 (1987) 441-451
8. Coelho L.d.S., and Mariani V.C. Particle swarm approach based on quantum mechanics and harmonic oscillator potential well for economic load dispatch with valve-point effects. Energy Convers Manage 4 (2008) 7-9
9. Georgakakos A.P., Yao H., and Yu Y. Control model for hydroelectric energy-value optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123 1 (1997) 30-38
10. Gill M.K., Kaheil Y.H., Khalil A., McKee M., and Bastidas L. Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology. Water Resour Res 42 7 (2006) W07417
11. Guan X.H., Luh P.B., and Zhang L. Nonlinear approximation method in Lagrangian relaxation-based algorithms for hydrothermal scheduling. IEEE Trans Power Syst 10 2 (1995) 772-778
12. Hong W.C. Rainfall forecasting by technological machine learning models. Appl Math Comput 200 1 (2008) 41-57
13. Montalvo I., Izquierdo J., Pérez R., and Michael M. Particle swarm optimization applied to the design of water supply systems. Comput Math Appl 56 3 (2008) 769-776
14. Yi J., Labadie J.W., and Stitt S. Dynamic optimal unit commitment and loading in hydropower systems. J Water Resour Plan Manage 129 5 (2003) 388-398
15. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on neural networks. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE Service Center; 1995. p. 1942-48.
16. Kumar D.N., and Reddy M.J. Multipurpose reservoir operation using particle swarm optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manage 133 3 (2007) 192-201
17. Lakshminarasimman L., and Subramanian S. A modified hybrid differential evolution for short-term scheduling of hydrothermal power systems with cascaded reservoirs. Energy Convers Manage 49 10 (2008) 2513-2521
18. Lee T.-Y. Optimal spinning reserve for a wind-thermal power system using EIPSO. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22 4 (2007) 1612-1621
19. Lee T.-Y. Short term hydroelectric power system scheduling with wind turbine generators using the multi-pass iteration particle swarm optimization approach. Energy Convers Manage 49 4 (2008) 751-760
20. Lee T.-Y., and Chen C.-L. Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve: an IPSO approach. Energy Convers Manage 48 2 (2007) 486-493
21. Mandal K.K., Basu M., and Chakraborty N. Particle swarm optimization technique based short-term hydrothermal scheduling. Appl Soft Comput 8 4 (2008) 1392-1399
22. Martin. Automated real-time hydropower scheduling for Lower Colorado River, Texas. Watershed Management and Operations Management, section 57; 2000 [chapter 1].
23. Oliveira P., Blair-Fish J., McKees S., and Coles C. Parallel Lagrangian relaxation in power scheduling. Comput Syst Eng 3 5 (1992) 609-612
24. Shourian M., Mousavi S.J., and Tahershamsi A. Basin-wide water resources planning by integrating PSO algorithm and MODSIM. Water Resour Manage 22 10 (2008) 1347-1366
25. Siu T., Nash G., and Shawwash Z. A practical hydro dynamic unit commitment and loading model. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16 2 (2001) 301-306
26. Snyder W.L., Powell H.D., and Rayburn J.C. Dynamic programming approach to unit commitment. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2 2 (1987) 339-348