A unified approach for reconciling characters and story in the realm of agency

ICAART 2009 - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 430-437

  Damiano, Rossana ^a   Lombardo, Vincenzo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artificial characters; Intelligent agents; Interactive drama

Indexed keywords

ACCURATE MODELING; AGENT THEORY; ARTIFICIAL CHARACTERS; COMMON FEATURES; COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEM; INTERACTIVE DRAMA; INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING; NON-DETERMINISM; PLANNING TECHNIQUES; PRACTICAL SYSTEMS; TWO-DIMENSION; UNIFIED APPROACH;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

INTELLIGENT AGENTS;

EID: 70349456792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Aylett, R., Vala, M., Sequeira, P., and Paiva, A. (2007). Fearnot!-an emergent narrative approach to virtual dramas for anti-bullying education. LNCS, 4871:202.
2. Bates, J., Loyall, A., and Reilly, W. (1994). An architecture for action, emotion, and social behaviour. Artificial Social Systems, LNAI830.
3. Bratman, M. E., Israel, D. J., and Pollack, M. E. (1988). Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349-355.
4. Cavazza, M., Charles, F., and Mead, S. (2002). Interacting with virtual characters in interactive storytelling. In Proc. of the First Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
5. Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., Nunnari, F., and Pizzo, A. (2006). Dramatization meets information presentation. In Proceedings of ECAI 2006, Riva del Garda, Italy.
6. Damiano, R., Lombardo, V., and Pizzo, A. (2005). Formal encoding of drama ontology. In LNCS 3805, Proc. of Virtual Storytelling 05, pages 95-104.
7. Damiano, R. and Pizzo, A. (2008). Emotions in drama characters and virtual agents. In AAAI Spring Symposium on Emotion, Personality, and Social Behavior.
8. Egri, L. (1946). The Art of Dramatic Writing. Simon and Schuster, New York.
9. Hartmann, K., Hartmann, S., and Feustel, M. (2005). Motif definition and classification to structure non-linear plots and to control the narrative flow in interactive dramas. Third International Conference, ICVS, pages 158-167.
10. Hayes-Roth, B., Brownston, L., and vanGent, R. (1995). Multi-agent collaboration in directed improvisation. In First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, San Francisco.
11. Iurgel, I. (2006). Cyranus-an authoring tool for interactive edutainment applications. In Pan, Z., Aylett, R., Diener, H., Jin, X., Goebel, S., and Li, L., editors, Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, volume LNCS 3942. Springer.
12. Mateas, M. and Stern, A. (2003). Integrating plot, character and natural language processing in the interactive drama faáde. In TIDSE 03.
13. Mateas, M. and Stern, A. (2005). Structuring content in the fa̧ade interactive drama architecture. In Proceedings of Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment.
14. McKee, R. (1997). Story. Harper Collins, New York.
15. Medler, B. and Magerko, B. (2006). Scribe: A tool for authoring event driven interactive drama. In Proc. of TIDSE 2006, volume LNCS 4326, Darmstadt (Germany). Springer.
16. Murray, J. (1998). Hamlet on the Holodeck. The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
17. Ortony, A., Clore, G., and Collins, A. (1988). The Cognitive Stucture of Emotions. Cambrigde University Press.
18. Peinado, F and Gervás, P. (2004). Transferring Game Mastering Laws to Interactive Digital Storytelling. Proc. of TIDSE 2004.
19. Pizzi, D., Charles, F., Lugrin, J., and Cavazza, M. (2007). Interactive storytelling with literary feelings. In ACII2007, Lisbon, Portugal, September. Springer.
20. Rao, A. and Georgeff, M. P. (1991). Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In Proc. 2th Int. Conf. Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR:91), pages 473-484, Cambridge, MA.
21. Riedl, M. and Stern, A. (2006). Believable Agents and Intelligent Story Adaptation for Interactive Storytelling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE06).
22. Riedl, M. and Young, M. (2006). From linear story generation to branching story graphs. IEEE Journal of Computer Graphics and Applications, pages 23-31.
23. Ryan, M. (2006). Avatars of Story. University of Minnesota Press.
24. Sgouros, N. (1999). Dynamic generation, management and resolution of interactive plots. Artificial Intelligence, 107(1):29-62.
25. Spierling, U. (2007). Adding Aspects of "Implicit Creation" to the Authoring Process in Interactive Storytelling. Proceedings of Virtual Storytelling 2007, LNCS 4871:13.
26. Swartjes, I. and Theune, M. (2006). A fabula model for emergent narrative. Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE), LNCS, 4326:95-100.
27. Szilas, N. (2003). Idtension: a narrative engine for interactive drama. In TIDSE 2003, Darmstadt (Germany).
28. Theune, M., Faas, S., Heylen, D., and Nijholt, A. (2003). The virtual storyteller: Story creation by intelligent agents. In Proceedings TIDSE 03, pages 204-215. Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
29. Wardrip-Fruin, N. and Harrigan, P. (2004). First Person: New Media As Story, Performance, and Game. MIT Press.
30. Weiss, S., Müller, W., Spierling, U., and Steimle, F. (2005). Scenejo-an interactive storytelling platform. In Sub-sol, G., editor, LNCS 3805, Proc. of Virtual Storytelling 05, pages 77-80. Springer.
31. Wooldridge, M. and Parsons, S. (1999). Intention reconsideration reconsidered. In Müller, J., Singh, M., and Rao, A., editors, Proc. of ATAL-98, volume 1555, pages 63-80. Springer-Verlag: Heidelberg, Germany.