Summarization of an online medical encyclopedia

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 107, Issue , 2004, Pages 506-510

  Fiszman, Marcelo ^a   Rindflesch, Thomas C ^a   Kilicoglu, Halil ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Automatic Summarization; Knowledge Representation; Natural Language Processing

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; SEMANTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

AUTOMATIC SUMMARIZATION; MULTIPLE DOCUMENTS; NATURAL LANGUAGES; TEXT GENERATORS; KNOWLEDGE-REPRESENTATION; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

COMPRESSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 70349454395     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-949-3-506     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Spark Jones K. Automatic Summarizing: Factors and Directions. In: Mani I and Maybury MT, eds. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999; pp. 1-13.
2. Hahn U, Mani I. The challenges of automatic summarization. Computer 2000: 33(11): 29-36.
3. Hovy E, Lin CY. Automated Text Summarization in SUM-MARIST In: Mani I and Maybury MT, eds. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999; pp 81-94.
4. Teufel S, Moens M. Summarizing Scientific Articles-Experiments with Relevance and Rhetorical Status. Computational Linguistics 2002; 28(4): 409-445.
5. Barzilay R, Elhadad M. Using Lexical Chains for Text Summarization In: Mani I and Maybury MT, eds. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999; pp 111-121.
6. Hahn U, Reimer U. Knowledge-based text summarization: Salience and generalization operators for knowledge base abstraction. In: Mani I and Maybury MT, eds. Advances in Automatic Text Summarization. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1999; pp. 215-232.
7. Humphreys BL, Lindberg DA, Schoolman HM, et al. The Unified Medical Language System: An informatics research collaboration. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998: 5(1): 1-11.
8. Rindflesch TC, Fiszman M. The interaction of domain knowledge and linguistic structure in natural language processing: Interpreting hypernymic propositions in biomedical text. J Biomed Inform 2003: 36(6): 462-77.
9. McCray AT, Burgun A, Bodenreider O. Aggregating UMLS semantic types for reducing conceptual complexity. Medinfo 2001: 10(Pt 1): 216-20.
10. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/encyclopedia.html.
11. Rindflesch TC, Bean CA, Sneiderman CA. Argument identification for arterial branching predications asserted in cardiac catheterization reports. Proc AMIA Symp 2000: 704-8.
12. Aronson AR. Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: The MetaMap program. Proc AMIA Symp 2001: 17-21.
13. Marcu D. From discourse structures to text summaries. Proc of the Workshop on Intelligent Scalable Text Summarization, Association for Computational Linguistics 1997: 82-88.
14. Jacquelinet C, Burgun A, Delamarre D, et al. Developing the ontological foundations of a terminological system for end-stage diseases, organ failure, dialysis and transplantation. Int J Med Inf 2003: 70(2-3): 317-28.
15. st annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 2003: 375-382
16. Batagelj V, Mrvar A. Pajek-Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks. In: Junger M and Mutzel P, eds. Graph Drawing Software. Berlin: Springer, 2003; pp. 77-103.