Viewing Michigan's digital future: Results of a survey of educators' use of digital video in the USA

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 243-257

  Mardis, Marcia A ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bandwidth; Broadband; Digital video; Technology policy; Video streaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349451618     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880903141539     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Boster, F.J., Meyer, G.S., Roberto, A.J., and Inge, C.C. 2002. A report on the effect of the unitedstreamingTM application on educational performance. Farmville, VA: Cometrika, Baseline Research, LLC and Longwood University.
2. Boster, F.J., Meyer, G.S., Roberto, A.J., Lindsey, L., Smith, R., Inge, C.C., and Strom, R.E. 2007. The impact of video streaming on mathematics performance. Communication Education 56, no.2: 134.
3. Boster, F.J., Meyer, G.S., Roberto, A.J., Lindsey, L., Smith, R., Strom, R.E., and Inge, C.C. 2004. A report on the effect of the unitedstreamingTM application on educational performance: The 2004 Los Angeles unified school district mathematics evaluation. Farmville, VA: Cometrika, Baseline Research, LLC and Longwood University.
4. Branigan, C. 2005. Technological, societal factors are driving the video trends. eSchool News, April 1, 12-16.
5. CPB (Corporation for Public Broadcasting). 2004. Television goes to school: The impact of video on student learning in formal education. New York: Education Department of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting's Center for Children and Technology.
6. Everhard, K. 2004. Up against Wal-Mart? Discovery builds stake in school VOD [Electronic Version]. Current. http://www.current.org/education/ ed0416discovery.shtml#educators (accessed May 14, 2008).
7. Gardner, H. 2000. Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
8. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., and Hughes, J. 2009. Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher 38, no.4: 246-259.
9. Mardis, M.A., and Hoffman, E.S. 2009. Streaming media in schools: Patterns of systemic implementation and use. Paper presented at the EDMEDIA: World Conference of Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, June, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
10. McPherson, K. 2004. Visual literacy and school libraries. Teacher Librarian 32, no.2: 58-59
11. Minkel, W. 2003. The once and future video. School Library Journal 49, no.1: 52-53.
12. NCES (National Center for Educational Statistics). 2008. Digest of education statistics, 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
13. Nugent, G. 2005. Use and delivery of learning objects in K-12: The public television experience. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning 49, no.4: 61-66.
14. Owston, R. 2009. Digital immersion, teacher learning, and games. Educational Researcher 38, no.4: 270-273.
15. PBS (Public Broadcasting System). 2003. New study shows PBS programming ranked #1 by the nation's educators. http://www.pbs.org/aboutpbs/news/20030529- educators.html (accessed May 14, 2008).
16. Perry, A., Meiro [scedi l ]u, C., Wanscher, C., Søndergaard, H., and Bech, M. 2008. Report on requirements of users in schools, the healthcare sector and the arts, humanities and social sciences. Amsterdam: TERENA.
17. Shephard, K. 2003. Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 34, no.3: 295-308.
18. Teaching and Learning. 2008. We all stream for video. Technology and Learning 29, no.3: 22-23.
19. Valenza, J.K. 2005. Guiding students and teachers to streaming media. Learning and Media 33, no.4: 14-15.
20. Weisner, C. 2002. Video streaming. Media and Methods 38, no.4: 10.
21. Yerrick, R., Ross, D., and Molebash, P. 2004. Promoting equity with digital video. Learning and Leading with Technology 31, no.4: 16-19.