Double tactile sensations evoked by a single visual stimulus on a rubber hand

Neuroscience Research

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 307-311

  Honma, Motoyasu ^a   Koyama, Shinichi ^b   Osada, Yoshihisa ^a  

^a RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Rubber hand illusion; Sensory integration; Somatic code; Tactile sensation; Visuo spatial code

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HAND; HAND PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOUCH; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BODY IMAGE; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HAND; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MECHANORECEPTORS; MENTAL PROCESSES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SELF CONCEPT; SPACE PERCEPTION; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349448414     PISSN: 01680102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neures.2009.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Armel K.C., and Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. Biol. Sci. 270 (2003) 1499-1506
2. Botvinick M., and Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 391 (1998) 756
3. Burrack A., Knoch D., and Brugger P. Mitempfindung in synaesthetes: co-incidence or meaningful association?. Cortex 42 (2006) 151-154
4. Durgin F.H., Evans L., Dunphy N., Klostermann S., and Simmons K. Rubber hands feel the touch of light. Psychol. Sci. 18 (2007) 152-157
5. Ehrsson H.H., Spence C., and Passingham R.E. That's my hand! Activity in premotor cortex reflects feeling of ownership of a limb. Science 305 (2004) 875-877
6. Farne A., Pavani F., Meneghello F., and Làdavas E. Left tactile extinction following visual stimulation of a rubber hand. Brain 123 (2000) 2350-2360
7. Holmes N.P., and Spence C. Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors. Exp. Brain Res. 166 (2005) 489-497
8. Iriki A. The neural origins and implications of imitation, mirror neurons and tool use. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16 (2006) 660-667
9. Iriki A., and Sakura O. The neuroscience of primate intellectual evolution: natural selection and passive and intentional niche construction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 363 (2008) 2229-2241
10. Kitazawa S. Where conscious sensation takes place. Conscious. Cogn. 11 (2002) 475-477
11. Maravita A., and Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci. 18 (2004) 79-86
12. Medina J., and Rapp B. Phantom tactile sensations modulated by body position. Curr. Biol. 18 (2008) 1937-1942
13. Pavani F., Spence C., and Driver J. Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychol. Sci. 11 (2000) 353-359
14. Ramachandran V.S., and Hirstein W. The perception of phantom limbs. Brain 121 (1998) 1603-1630
15. Ramachandran V.S., Rogers-Ramachandran D., and Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 377 (1995) 489-490
16. Rorden C., Heutink J., Greenfield E., and Robertson I.H. When a rubber hand 'feels' what the real hand cannot. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 135-138
17. Tsakiris M., and Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: visuotactile integration and self-attribution. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31 (2005) 80-91
18. Yamamoto S., and Kitazawa S. Reversal of subjective temporal order due to arm crossing. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 759-765
19. Yamamoto S., and Kitazawa S. Sensation at the tips of invisible tools. Nat. Neurosci. 4 (2001) 979-980