Mining the semantics of genome super-blocks to infer ancestral architectures

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 1267-1284

  Jean, Géraldine ^a   Sherman, David James ^a   Nikolski, MacHa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Automata; Genomic rearrangements; Protein families

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ARCHITECTURE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; EVOLUTION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; MARKER GENE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; SEMANTICS; YEAST;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CATS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOME; GENOME, FUNGAL; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 70349445550     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2008.0046     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bourque, G., and Pevzner, P. 2002. Genome-scale evolution: reconstructing gene orders in the ancestral species. Genome Res. 12, 26-36.
2. Bourque, G., Tesler, G., and Pevzner, P. 2006. The convergence of cytogenetics and rearrangement-based models for ancestral genome reconstruction. Genome Res. 16, 311-313.
3. Bourque, G., Zdobnov, E., Bork, P., et al. 2004. Comparative architectures of mammalian and chicken genomes reveal highly variable rates of genomic rearrangements accross different lineages. Genome Res. 15, 98-110.
4. Bryant, D. 1998. The complexity of the breakpoint median problem. Technical Report CRM2579. Centre de Recherches Mathematiques, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
5. Caprara, A. 1999. Formulations and complexity of multiple sorting by reversals. Proc. RECOMB 1999 84-93.
6. Caprara, A. 2003. The reversal median problem. INFORMS J. Comput. 15, 93-113.
7. Dujon, B. 2006. Yeasts illustrate the molecular mechanisms of eukaryotic genome evolution. Trends Genet. 22, 375-387.
8. Dujon, B., Sherman, D., Fischer G., et al. 2004. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430, 35-44.
9. Eriksen, N. 2007. Reversal and transposition medians. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 374, 111-126.
10. Froenicke, L., Caldés, M., Graphodatsky, A., et al. 2006. Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes? Genome Res. 16, 306-310.
11. Garey, M., and Johnson, D. 1979. Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. W.H. Freeman & Co., San Francisco.
12. Goëffon, A., Nikolski M., and Sherman, D. 2008. An efficient probabilistic population-based descent for the median genome problem. Proc. GECCO 2008 315-321.
13. Hannenhalli, S., Chappey, C., Koonin, E., et al. 1995. Genome sequence comparison and scenarios for gene rearrangements: a test case. Genomics 30, 299-311.
14. Hannenhalli, S., and Pevzner, P. 1995. Transforming cabbage into turnip (polynomial algorithm for sorting signed permutations by reversals). Proc. 27th Annu. ACM Symp. Theory Comput. 178-189.
15. Ma, J., Zhang, L., Suh, B., et al. 2006. Reconstructing contiguous regions of an ancestral genome. Genome Res. 16, 1557-1565.
16. Martin, N., Ruedi, E., LeDuc, R., et al. 2007. Gene-interleaving patterns of synteny in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome: are they proof of an ancient genome duplication event? Biol. Direct 2, 23.
17. Nadeau, J., and Taylor, B. 1984. Lengths of chromosomal segments conserved since divergence of man and mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81, 814-818.
18. Nikolski, M., and Sherman, D. 2007. Family relationships: should consensus reign?-consensus clustering for protein families. Bioinformatics 23, e71-e76.
19. Pe'er, I., and Shamir, R. 1998. The median problems for breakpoints are NP-complete. Electronic Colloq. Comput. Complex. 5, 71.
20. Rocchi, M., Archidiacono, N., and Stanyon, R. 2006. Ancestral genomes reconstruction: an integrated, multidisciplinary approach is needed. Genome Res. 16, 1557-1565.
21. Sankoff, D., and Blanchette, M. 1997. The median problem for breakpoints in comparative genomics. COCOON '97 251-264.
22. Sankoff, D., Sundaram, G., and Kececioglu, J. D. 1996. Steiner points in the space of genome rearrangements. Int. J. Found. Comput. Sci. 7, 1-9.
23. Sankoff, D., and Trinh, P. 2005. Chromosomal breakpoint reuse in genome sequence rearrangement. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 812-821.
24. Simillion, C., Vandepoele, K., Saeys, Y., et al. 2004. Building genomic profiles for uncovering segmental homology in the twilight zone. Genome Res. 14, 1095-1106.
25. Tarjan, R., and Trojanowski, A. 1976. Finding a maximum independent set. Technical report CS-TR-76-550. Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
26. Vandepoele, K., Saeys, Y., Simillion, C., et al. 2002. The automatic detection of homologous regions (ADHoRe) and its application to microcolinearity between arabidopsis and ric. Genome Res. 12, 1792-1801.
27. Wilkinson, D. G. 1993. In Situ Hybridization: A Practical Approach. IRL Press, New York.
28. Wolfe, K., and Shields, D. 1997. Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome. Nature 387, 708-713.