A multi-objective particle swarm optimization for project selection problem

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 315-321

  Rabbani, M ^a   Aramoon Bajestani, M ^a   Baharian Khoshkhou, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Multi objective genetic algorithm; Multi objective particle swarm; Project selection problem

Indexed keywords

COMPARISON METRICS; CRITICAL ISSUES; DECISION MAKERS; INVESTMENT PROPOSALS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; MULTI OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION; MULTI-OBJECTIVE GENETIC ALGORITHM; MULTI-OBJECTIVE PARTICLE SWARM; NP-HARD PROBLEM; PARETO-OPTIMAL FRONTIERS; PARTICLE SWARM; PROJECT SELECTION PROBLEM; RANDOM INSTANCE; SWARM MEMBERS; TOTAL BENEFITS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO);

MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 70349443671     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.056     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Badri M., Davis D., and Davis D. A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection. International Journal of Project Management 19 (2001) 243-252
2. Carlsson C., Fullér R., Heikkilä M., and Majlender P. A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 44 (2007) 93-105
3. Coello, C. A. C., & Lechunga, M. S. (2002). MOPSO: A proposal for multiple objective particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 2002 congress on evolutionary computation, part of the 2002 IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (pp. 1051-1056), Hawaii, May 12-17, 2002. IEEE Press.
4. Collette Y., and Siarry P. Multi-objective optimization: Principles and case studies (2003), Springer
5. Dey P.K. Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique. International Journal of Economics 103 (2006) 90-103
6. Doerner K., Gutjahr W., Hartl R., Strauss C., and Stummer C. Pareto ant colony optimization: A met heuristic approach to multi-objective portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research 131 (2004) 79-99
7. Fieldsend, J. E., & Singh, S. (2002). A multi-objective algorithm based upon particle swarm optimization, an efficient data structure and turbulence. In Proceedings of UK workshop on computational intelligence (UKCI'02) (pp. 37-44), Birmingham, UK, September 2-4.
8. Fieldsend, J. E. (2004). Multi-objective particle swarm optimization methods. 1st March, Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter.
9. Gabriel S.A., Kumar S., Ordóñez J., and Nasserian A. A multi-objective optimization model for project selection with probabilistic considerations. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 40 (2006) 297-313
10. Hu, X., Shi, Y., & Eberhart, R. C. (2004). Recent advances in particle swarm. In IEEE congress on evolutionary computation 2004, Portland, Oregon, USA.
11. Hu, X., & Eberhart, R. C., (2002). Multiobjective optimization using dynamic neighborhood particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 2002 congress on evolutionary computation, part of the 2002 IEEE world congress on computational intelligence, Hawaii, May 12-17. IEEE Press.
12. Huang X. Optimal project selection with random fuzzy parameters. International Journal of Production Economics 106 (2007) 513-522
13. Jiang, Y., Hu, T., Huang, C., & Wu, X. (2007). An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation. doi:10.1016/j.amc.2007.03.047.
14. Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. C. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942-1948).
15. Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. C. (1997). A discrete binary version of the particle swarm algorithm. In Proceedings of the world multiconference on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (pp. 4104-4109), Piscataway, NJ.
16. Liao C., Tseng C., and Luarn P. A discrete version of particle swarm optimization for flow shop scheduling problems. Computers and Operations Research 34 (2007) 3099-3111
17. Mavrotas, G., Diakoulaki, D., & Kourentzis, A. (2007). Selection among ranked projects under segmentation, policy and logical constraints. European Journal of Operational Research. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.03.010.
18. Medaglia A.L., Graves S.B., and Ringuest J.L. A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty. European Journal of Operational Research 179 (2007) 869-894
19. Mostaghim, S., & Teich, J. (2003). Strategies for finding good local guides in multi-objective particle swarm optimization (mopso). In IEEE 2003 swarm intelligence symposium.
20. Mukherjee K., and Bera A. Application of goal programming in project selection decision - A case study from the indian coal mining industry. European Journal of Operational Research 82 (1995) 18-25
21. Niu B., Zhu Y., He X., and Wu H. MCPSO: A multi-swarm cooperative particle swarm optimizer. Applied Mathematics and Computation 185 (2007) 1050-1062
22. Parsopoulos, K. E., & Vrahatis, M. N. (2002). Particle swarm optimization method in multiobjective problems. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on applied computing (pp. 603-607).
23. Rabbani M., Tavakoli Moghadam R., Jolai F., and Ghorbani H. A comprehensive model for R&D project with 0-1 linear goal programming. International Journal of Engineering 19 (2006) 55-66
24. Rey T., and Leiw K.M. A swarm metaphor for multiobjective design optimization. Engineering Optimization 34 2 (2002) 141-153
25. Santhanam R., and Kyparisis J. A multiple criteria decision model for information system project selection. Computers and Operations Research 22 (1995) 807-818
26. Santhanam R., and Kyparisis J. A decision model for interdependent information system project selection. European Journal of Operational Research 89 (1996) 380-399
27. Sha D.Y., and Hsu C. A hybrid particle swarm optimization for job shop scheduling problem. Computers and Industrial Engineering 51 (2006) 791-808
28. Stummer C., and Heidenberger K. Interactive R&D portfolio selection considering multiple objectives, project interdependencies, and time: A three-phase approach. In: Kocaoglu D., and Anderson T. (Eds). Technology management in the knowledge era (2001), Picmet, Portland 423-428
29. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., & Thiele L. (2001). SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm. In K. Giannakoglou, D. Tsahalis, J. Periaux, P. Papailou, & T. Fogarty (Eds.), EUROGEN 2001, evolutionary methods for design, optimization and control with applications to industrial problems (pp. 95-100), Athens, Greece, September 2001.