Using mobile phones for survey research a comparison with fixed phones

International Journal of Market Research

Volumn 51, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 613-633

  Vicente, Paula ^a   Reis, Elizabeth ^a   Santos, Maria ^a  

^a INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349443074     PISSN: 14707853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2501/S1470785309200852     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Brick, J., Brick, P., Dipko, S., Presser, S., Tucker, C. & Yuan, Y. (2007) Cell phone feasibility in the US: sampling and calling cell numbers versus fixed numbers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 1, pp. 23-29.
2. Callegaro, M. & Poggio, T. (2004) Where can I call you? The mobile phone revolution and its impact on survey research and coverage error: a discussion of the Italian case. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Logic and Methodology, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 16-20 August.
3. Chang, L. & Krosnick, J. (2008) National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing vs the internet: comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Working paper. Retrieved from www.knowledgenetworks.com/ganp/docs/ RDD%20vs%20web.pdf. Accessed 30 July 2009.
4. Dipko, S., Brick, P., Brick, J. & Presser, S. (2005) An investigation of response difference between cell phone and landline interviews. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Miami Beach, Florida, 12-15 May.
5. EU Statistics (2007) Special Eurobarometer 274: E-Communications Households Survey. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/public-opinion/archives/ ebs/ebs-274-sum-en. pdf. Accessed 22 November 2007.
6. Fricker, S., Galesic, M., Tourangeau, R. & Yan, T. (2005) An experimental comparison of web and telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69, 3, pp. 370-392.
7. Groves, R., Biemer, P., Lyberg, L., Massey, J., Nicholls, W. & Waksberg, J. (eds) (1988) Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley.
8. ICC/ESOMAR (2007) International Code on Market and Social Research. Retrieved from www.esomar.org/index.php/codes-guidelines.html. Accessed 6 December 2007.
9. Jäckie, A. & Roberts, C. (2007) Assessing the effect of data collection mode on measurement. Paper presented at the 56th Session of the International Statistical Institute, Lisbon, Portugal, 22-29 August.
10. Krosnick, J. (1991) Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 3, pp. 213-236.
11. Krosnick, J., Holbrook, A., Berent, M., Carson, R., Hanemann, W., Kopp, R., Mitchell, R., Presser, S., Ruud, P., Smith, V., Moody, W., Green, M. & Conaway, M. (2002) The impact of 'no opinion' response options on data quality: non-attitude reduction or an invitation to satisfice? Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 3, pp. 371-403.
12. Kuusela, V. & Notkola, V. (1999) Survey quality and mobile phones. Paper presented at the International Conference on Survey Nonresponse, Portland, 28-31 October.
13. Kuusela, V. & Simpanen, M. (2002) Effects of mobile phones on telephone survey practices and results. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark, 18-20 July.
14. Lavrakas, P., Shuttles, C., Steeh, C. & Fienberg, H. (2007) The state of surveying cell phone numbers in the United States: 2007 and beyond. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 5, pp. 840-854.
15. Link, M., Battaglia, M., Frankel, M., Osborn, L. & Mokdad, A. (2007) Reaching the US cell phone generation: comparison of cell phone survey results with an ongoing landline telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 5, pp. 814-839.
16. Littlechild, S. (2006) Mobile terminations charges: calling party pays versus receiving party pays. Telecommunications Policy, 30, 5-6, pp. 242-277.
17. MRS (2005) Code of Conduct. Retrieved from www.mrs.org.uk/standards/ codecondua.htm. Accessed 6 December 2007.
18. Nathan, G. (2001) Telesurvey methodologies for household surveys: a review and some thoughts for the future. Survey Methodology, 27, 1, pp. 7-31.
19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000) Cellular Mobile Pricing Structures and Trends, 19 May. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/dataoecd/54/42/2538118.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2007.
20. Roy, G. & Vanheuverzwyn, A. (2002) Mobile phone in sample surveys. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent Computing, Copenhagen, Denmark, 18-20 July.
21. Tucker, C., Brick, J. M. & Meekins, B. (2007) Household telephone service and usage patterns in the United States in 2004: implications for telephone samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 71, 1, pp. 3-22.
22. Vehovar, V., Belak, E., Batagelj, Z. & Cikic, S. (2004) Mobile phone surveys: the Slovenian case study. Metodoloski zvezki, 1, 1, pp. 1-19.