Scientometric dimensions of technical reports from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre

Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 17-30

  Swarna, T ^a   Kalyane, V L ^a   Kumar, Vijai ^a  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Bhabha Atomic Research Centre; Bibliometrics; Collaboration coefficient; Conventional sources; Information generation and dissemination; Non conventional sources; Scientometrics; Single research institute productivity; Technical report

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952711840     PISSN: 13946234     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Atkins, S. E. 2000. Historical Encyclopedia of Atomic Energy. London: Greenwood Press. pp 258-260.
2. Bhat, V. G. and R.E. Raju. 1977. Ranking of periodicals in the field of astronautics and aeronautics. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 24 no. 3-4: 114-118.
3. Bhat, V. G. and R.E. Raju. 1980. Organisation of report literature in a technical library having moderate collections: a case study. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 27 no. 1-4: 30-33.
4. BSI 1993. Universal Decimal Classification, International Medium Edition, BS 1000M. London: British Standard Institute.
5. DAE 2000. Department of Atomic Energy: Annual Report 1999-2000, Department of Atomic Energy: 2.1.
6. th ed. London, Aslib. p 123.
7. IAEA 1997. INIS: Subject Categories and Scope Descriptions. Rev.8. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. pp 13-131.
8. ISI 1980. Indian Standard: Guide for the preparation of Bibliographic Description sheet for Technical Reports. New Delhi: Indian Standards Institution New Delhi. pp 1-9.
9. Jeffery, Keith G. 2000. An architecture for grey literature in an R&D context Journal of Grey Literature. Vol. 01, no. 2: 64-72.
10. Kakodkar, Anil 2000. Foreword, BARC Progress Report - 1999. Mumbai: Library & Information Services Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre. p iii.
11. Kalyane, V. L. and R.S. Devarai. 1994. Empathy in public librarianship: a subjective and qualitative analysis, Indian Journal of Information Library and Society, Vol. 7 no. 1-2: 87-104.
12. Kalyane, V. L. and S.V. Kalyane. 1991. Scientometric dimensions of innovation communication productivity systems. Annals of Library Science and Documentation, Vol. 38 no. 1: 8-29.
13. Kalyane, V. L. and S.V. Kalyane. 1992. Librarianship in 2000 AD, University News, Vol. 30 no. 35: 73-74.
14. Kalyane, V. L. and S.V. Kalyane. 1994. R&D communication strategy vis-à-vis librarianship, Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 4 no. 3: 105-135.
15. Kalyane, V. L. and S.V. Kalyane. 1996. Database on creativity and innovation communication productivity of science in India: a case study. Journal of Information Sciences, Vol. 7 no. 1: 3-44.
16. Kalyane, V. L. and Vidyasagar Rao. 1992. Collaboration trends in sugarcane research: a case study. Annals of Library Science and Documentation. Vol. 39 no. 1: 9-11.
17. Kemp, D. Alasdair 1988. Computer-based Knowledge Retrieval. London: Aslib. p 139.
18. Kent, Allen; Harold Lancour; Jay E. Daily and William Z. Nasri. (Eds) 1968. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science: Vol. 30. New York: Marcel Dekker. p 146.
19. rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Company. pp 985, 989, 1032.
20. th ed. London: Aslib. p 98.
21. Sridhar, M. S. 1984. Use of technical reports and standards. IASLIC Bulletin, Vol. 29 no. 3: 99-106.
22. Subramanyam, K. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: review. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 6 no. 1: 33-38.
23. Watters, Carolyn 1992. Dictionary of Information Science and Technology. London: Academic. pp 234-235.