Penalized optimal designs for dose-finding

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 140, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 283-296

  Pronzato, Luc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NICE SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS   (France)

Author keywords

Bivariate binary model; Compound optimal design; Constrained optimal design; Dose finding; Optimal experimental design; Penalized experimental design

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349410236     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2009.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chaudhuri P., and Mykland P. Nonlinear experiments: optimal design and inference based likelihood. Journal of the American Statistical Association 88 422 (1993) 538-546
2. Cook D., and Fedorov V. Constrained optimization of experimental design (invited discussion paper). Statistics 26 (1995) 129-178
3. Cook D., and Wong W. On the equivalence between constrained and compound optimal designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 89 426 (1994) 687-692
4. Dragalin V., and Fedorov V. Adaptive designs for dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity response. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136 (2006) 1800-1823
5. Dragalin V., Fedorov V., and Wu Y. Adaptive designs for selecting drug combinations based on efficacy-toxicity response. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 138 (2008) 352-373
6. Durham S., and Flournoy N. Random walks for quantile estimation. In: Berger J., and Gupta S. (Eds). Statistical Decision Theory and Related Topics V (1994), Springer, New York 467-476
7. Fedorov V., and Hackl P. Model-Oriented Design of Experiments (1997), Springer, Berlin
8. Gautier, R., Pronzato, L., 1998. Sequential design and active control. In: Flournoy, N., Rosenberger, W., Wong, W. (Eds.), New Developments and Applications in Experimental Design, Lecture Notes-Monograph Series, vol. 34. IMS, Hayward, pp. 138-151.
9. Gautier R., and Pronzato L. Adaptive control for sequential design. Discussiones Mathematicae, Probability & Statistics 20 1 (2000) 97-114
10. Giovagnoli A., and Pintacuda N. Properties of frequency distributions induced by general 'up-and-down' methods for estimating quantiles. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 74 (1998) 51-63
11. Haines L., Perevozskaya I., and Rosenberger W. Bayesian optimal designs in phase I clinical trials. Biometrics 59 (2003) 591-600
12. Hardwick J., and Stout Q. Optimizing a unimodal response function for binary variables. In: Atkinson A., Bogacka B., and Zhigljavsky A. (Eds). Optimum Design 2000 (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 195-210 (Chapter 18)
13. Harman R., and Pronzato L. Improvements on removing non-optimal support points in D-optimum design algorithms. Statistics & Probability Letters 77 (2007) 90-94
14. Ivanova A. A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes. Biometrics 59 (2003) 1001-1007
15. Kiefer J., and Wolfowitz J. The equivalence of two extremum problems. Canadian Journal of Mathematics 12 (1960) 363-366
16. Kpamegan E., and Flournoy N. An optimizing up-and-down design. In: Atkinson A., Bogacka B., and Zhigljavsky A. (Eds). Optimum Design 2000 (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 211-224 (Chapter 19)
17. Mikulecká J. On a hybrid experimental design. Kybernetika 19 1 (1983) 1-14
18. Pronzato L. Adaptive optimisation and D-optimum experimental design. Annals of Statistics 28 6 (2000) 1743-1761
19. Pronzato, L., 2009a. Asymptotic properties of nonlinear least squares estimates in stochastic regression models over a finite design space. Application to self-tuning optimisation. In: Preprints of 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification. July 6-8, 2009, Saint-Malo, France, pp. 156-161.
20. Pronzato, L., 2009b. One-step ahead adaptive D-optimal design on a finite design space is asymptotically optimal. Metrika, to appear, doi:10.1007/s00184-008-0227-y.
21. Pukelsheim F. Optimal Experimental Design (1993), Wiley, New York