An intellectual property-based corporate strategy: An R&D spend, patent, trademark, media communication, and market price innovation agenda

Scientometrics

Volumn 80, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 731-746

  Daizadeh, Iraj ^a,b  

^a AMGEN INC   (United States)

^b IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349339165     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-008-2105-9     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Asness, C.S. (2005), Rubble logic: What did we learn from the great stock market bubble? Financial Analysts Journal, 61(6): 36-54.
2. Best, K. (2005), Internet finance and frenzy at the millennium. Consumption, Markets & Culture, 8(4): 361-378.
3. Bosworth, B.; Hymans, S.; Modigliani, F. (1975), The stock market and the economy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1975(2): 257-300.
4. Brock, W. A.; Hsief, D. A.; Lebaron, B. (1993), Nonlinear dynamics, chaos, and instability. The Journal of Finance, 48(1): 404-407.
5. Daizadeh, I. (2007a), Issued US patents, patent-related global academic & media publications, & the US market indices are correlated, with varying growth patterns. Scientometrics, 73: 29-36.
6. Daizadeh, I. (2007b), Intellectual property management in R&D intensive firms. International Journal of Intellectual Property Management, 1: 184-205
7. Daizadeh, I. (2007c), Patent journalism: An emergence of a new form of science communication. Under review.
8. Daizadeh, I. (2006a), Using intellectual property to map the evolution of a firm's social structure: Tracing a biotechnology company from startup to bureaucracy to a multidivisional firm. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology, 13: 28-36
9. Daizadeh, I. (2006b), An example of information management in biology: Qualitative data economizing theory applied to the human genome project databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57: 244-250
10. Daizadeh, I. (2003a), Patents & the Organizational Structure of R&D Firms. University of Cambridge MBA Dissertation. Copyright by IRAJ DAIZADEH (67 pages)
11. Daizadeh, I. (2003b), Integrating intellectual property within the organizational social structure. Nature Biotechnology, 21: 573-575
12. Daizadeh, I.; Miller, D.; Glowalla, A.; Leamer, M.; Nandi, R.; Numark, C. I. (2002), A general approach for determining when to patent, publish, or protect information as a trade secret. Nature Biotechnology, 20: 1053-1054
13. Decarlo, L. T. (1997), On the meaning and use of kurtosis. Psychological Methods, 2(3): 292-307.
14. Dufwenberg, M.; Lindqvist, T.; Moore, E. (2005), Bubbles and experience: An experiment. American Economic Review, 95(5): 1731-1737.
15. Ellett, F. S., Jr.; Ericson, D. P. (1986) Correlation, partial correlation, and causation. Synthese, 67(2): 157-173.
16. Engle, R. (2001), GARCH 101: The use of ARCH/GARCH models in applied econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4): 157-168.
17. Factiva (2007), Data downloaded from http://global.factiva.com/ha/default.aspx on 29-Jan-2007.
18. Factiva Brochure in PDF format was obtained from http://www.factiva.com/collateral/files/factivacom_brochure_F-2544.pdf on 04-Jan-2007. Viewed as marketing materials, there is no author or other descriptive factors within this document.
19. Franses, P. H.; van Dijk, D., Nonlinear Time Series Models in Empirical Finance. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2000.
20. Griliches, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-1707.
21. Healy, P. M.; Palepu, K. G. (2001), Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 405-440.
22. Hall, B. H. (2004), Exploring the patent explosion. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1-2): 35-48
23. Kyrtsou, C.; Leontitsis, A.; Siriopoulos, C. (2006), Exploring the impact of calendar effects on the dynamic structure and forecasts of financial time series. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 9(1): 1-22.
24. Landes, W. M., Posner, R. A., The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Harvard University Press. United States, 2003.
25. Market (2007) The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation (NASDAQ) index values were downloaded from http://finance.yahoo.com on 29-Jan-2007.
26. Mendonca, S.; Pereira, T. S.; Godinho, M. M., Trademarks as indicator of innovation and industrial change. Research Policy, 33(9): 1385-1404.
27. Mikhail, O.; Baker, J. (2006), Further evidence on the presence of non-linearity in the DJIA. International Advances in Economic Research, 12(4): 552
28. Morck, R.; Yeung, B.; Yu, W. (2000), The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58: 215-260.
29. NSF (2002), National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resource Statistics, Research and Development in Industry: NSF 06-322, Project Officer, Raymond M. Wolfe (Arlington, VA 2006). Data taken from: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf06322/tables.htm#group1 on 02-Feb-2007.
30. Ramello, G.B., What's in a sign? Trademark law and economic theory. Journal of Economic Surveys, 20(4): 547-565.
31. Rigby, D. (2001), Moving upward in a downturn. Harvard Business Review, 79(6): 98-105.
32. Rogers, M. (1998), The definition and measurement of innovation. Melbourne Institute Working Paper Number 10/98 obtained from: http://melbourneinstitute.com//wp/wp98n10.pdf on 19-May-2007.
33. Sato, A-H.; Takayasu, H. (1998), Dynamic numerical models of stock market price: from microscopic determinism to macroscopic randomness. Physica A, 250(1): 232-252.
34. Shimizu, S.; Hyvärinen, A.; Hoyer, P.O.; Kano, Y. (2006), Finding a causal ordering via independent component analysis. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50(11): 3278-3293.
35. SAS Institute, Inc. SAS Version 8.2, Cary, N.C.: SAS Institute, 1999.
36. Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples), Biometrika, 52(3-4): 591-611.
37. Stephens, M. A. (1974) EDF statistics for goodness of fit and some comparisons. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69: 730-737.
38. Thode, H.C., Jr., Testing for Normality, Marcel Dekker: New York, 2002.
39. USPTO, The data was downloaded from The United States Patent and Trademark Organization patent and trademark search engines located on http://www.uspto.gov on 27-Jan-2007.