Land-use and land-base patterns in non-industrial private forests: Factors affecting forest management in Northern Spain

Forest Policy and Economics

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 475-490

  Rodríguez Vicente, Verónica ^a   Marey Pérez, Manuel F ^b  

^a Galician Sectorial Forestry Association (ASEFOGA)   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Holding size; Land parcellation; Land use change; Non industrial private forest (NIPF) owner; Planting, silviculture and harvesting practices

Indexed keywords

HOLDING SIZE; LAND PARCELLATION; LAND-USE CHANGE; NON-INDUSTRIAL PRIVATE FOREST (NIPF) OWNER; PLANTING, SILVICULTURE AND HARVESTING PRACTICES;

HARVESTING; LAND USE; PLANNING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RURAL AREAS; TIMBER;

FORESTRY;

FORESTRY; FORESTS; HARVESTING; LAND USE; PLANNING; PLANTING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 70349326192     PISSN: 13899341     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2009.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Arano K.G., and Munn I.A. Evaluating forest management intensity: a comparison among major forestland owner types. Forest Policy and Economics 9 (2006) 237-248
2. Arano K.G., Munn I.A., Gunter J.E., Bullard S.H., and Doolitle M.L. Comparison between regenerators and non-regenerators in Mississippi: a discriminant analysis. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 22 2 (2004) 132-138
3. Beach R.H., Pattanayak S.K., Yang J., Murray B.C., and Abt R.C. Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 261-281
4. Beiras-Torrado X.M. A emigración: o seu papel na dinámica da formación social. In: García-Sabell D. (Ed). A Galicia rural na encrucillada (1975), Galaxia, Vigo, Spain 39-73
5. Biĉík I., Jeleĉek L., and Ŝtěpánek V. Land-use changes and their social driving forces in Czechia in the 19th and 20th centuries. Land Use Policy 18 (2001) 65-73
6. Binkley C.S. Timber supply from private nonindustrial forests. Bulletin No. 92 (1981), Yale University School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven CT
7. Bolkesjø T.F., and Baardsen S. Roundwood supply in Norway: micro-level analysis of self-employed forest owners. Forest Policy and Economics 4 (2002) 55-64
8. Bolkesjø T.F., Solberg B., and Wangen K.R. Heterogeneity in nonindustrial private roundwood supply: lessons from a large panel of forest owners. Journal of Forest Economics 13 (2007) 7-28
9. Boyd R. Government support of non-industrial production: the case of private forests. Southern Economic Journal 51 1 (1984) 89-107
10. Butler B.J., Swenson J.J., and Alig R.J. Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. Forest Ecology and Management 189 (2004) 363-373
11. Cao-Abad R. Análisis multivariante. Curso de postgrado en estadística aplicada (2002), University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
12. Cihlar J., and Jansen L.J.M. From land cover to land-use: a methodology for efficient land-use mapping over large areas. The Professional Geographer 53 2 (2001) 275-289
13. Conway M.C., Amacher G.S., and Sullivan B.J. Decisions nonindustrial forest landowners make: an empirical examination. Journal of Forest Economics 9 (2003) 181-203
14. Cubbage F.W. The value of foresters. Forest Landowner 62 l (2003) 16-19
15. Dewees P.A. Social and economic incentives for smallholder tree growing: a case study from Muranga District, Kenya. Community Forestry Case Study Series 5 (1992), FAO, Rome, Italy
16. Etxezarreta M. La evolución del campesinado. La agricultura en el desarrollo capitalista (1979), Servicio de Publicaciones del MAPA, Madrid, Spain
17. Finley, A.O., 2002. Assessing private forest landowners' attitudes towards, and ideas for, cross-boundary cooperation in western Massachusetts. Ph. Thesis. University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 28 pp.
18. Gunter J.E., Bullard S.H., Doolitle M.L., and Arano K.G. Reforestation of Harvested Timberlands in Mississippi: Behaviour and Attitudes of Non-industrial Private Forest Landowners (2001), Mississippi State University, Mississippi 25 pp.
19. Hardie I.W., and Parks P.J. Program enrollment and acreage response to reforestation cost-sharing programs. Land Economics 72 (1996) 248-260
20. Healy R.G. Competition for Land in the American South (1985), The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC 333 pp.
21. Herbohn J. Prospects for small-scale forestry in Australia. In: Niskanen A., and Väyrynen J. (Eds). Economic Sustainability of Small-scale Forestry. EFI Proceedings no 36 (2001), European Forest Institute, Finland 9-20
22. Hodges D.G., and Cubbage F.W. Adoption behaviour of technical assistance foresters in the Southern Pine region. Forest Science 36 3 (1990) 516-530
23. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression (2000), John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, The United States 2 a ed
24. Hyberg B., and Holthausen D. The behavior of non-industrial private forest landowners. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 19 (1989) 1014-1023
25. INE, 2004. 2004. [Internet site]. Consumer Price Index. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid, Spain. Available at: http://www.ine.es/daco/ipc.htm. [Cited 6 December 2004].
26. Jansen L.J.M., and Di Gregorio A. Land-use data collection using the "land cover classification system": results from a case study in Kenya. Land Use Policy 20 (2003) 131-148
27. Karppinen H. Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32 1 (1998) 43-59
28. Kendra, A., 2003. New landowners in Virginia's forest: a study of motivations, management activities, and perceived obstacles. Ph. Thesis. Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 163 pp.
29. Kittredge D.B. The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: international examples and potential application in the United States. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 671-688
30. Kline J.D., and Alig R.J. A spatial model of land use change for western Oregon and western Washington. Research paper PNW-RP-528. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 32 pp (2001)
31. Kline J.D., Butler B.J., and Alig R.J. Tree planting in the south: what does the future hold?. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 26 2 (2002) 99-107
32. Koontz T.M. Money talks- but to whom? Financial versus nonmonetary motivations in land use decisions. Society & Natural Resources 14 1 (2001) 51-65
33. Kurttila M., Hamalainen K., Kajanus M., and Pesonen M. Non-industrial private forest owners' attitudes towards the operational environment of forestry - a multinomial logit model analysis. Forest Policy and Economics 2 1 (2001) 13-28
34. Kuuluvainen J., and Salo J. Timber supply and life cycle harvest of non-industrial private forest owners: an empirical analysis of the Finnish case. Forest Science 37 (1991) 1011-1029
35. Kuuluvainen J., Karppinen H., and Ovaskainen V. Landowner objectives and nonindustrial private timber supply. Forest Science 42 (1996) 300-308
36. Löyland K., Kringstad V., and Öy H. Determinants of forest activities - a study of private non-industrial forestry in Norway. Journal of Forest Economics 1 2 (1995) 219-237
37. Madsen L.M., and Adriansen H.K. Understanding the use of rural space: the need for multi-methods. Journal of Rural Studies 20 (2004) 485-497
38. Mahapatra A.K., and Mitchell C.P. Classifying tree planters and non planters in a subsistence farming system using a discriminant analytical approach. Agroforestry Systems 52 (2001) 41-52
39. Marey-Pérez, M.F., 2003. Tenencia de la tierra en Galicia: modelo para la caracterización de los propietarios forestales. Ph. Thesis. University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 633 pp.
40. Marey-Pérez M.F., and Rodríguez-Vicente V. Forest transition in Northern Spain: local responses on large-scale programmes of field-afforestation. Land Use Policy 26 1 (2008) 139-156
41. Marey-Pérez M.F., Rodríguez-Vicente V., and Crecente-Maseda R. El monte en Galicia en el siglo XXI: balance evolutivo y consideraciones para el futuro. In: Maya-Frades A. (Ed). ¿Qué futuro para los espacios rurales? (2004), University of León, León, Spain 117-125
42. Marey-Pérez M.F., Rodríguez-Vicente V., and Crecente-Maseda R. Using GIS to measure changes in the temporal and spatial dynamics of forestland: experiences from north-west Spain. Forestry 79 4 (2006) 409-423
43. MMA. III Inventario Forestal Nacional. Madrid. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza (1998), Ministerio de Medio Ambiente
44. Munn I.A., and Rucker R. The value of information in a market for factors of production with multiple attributes: the role of consultants in private timber sales. Forest Science 40 (1994) 474-486
45. Newman D.H., and Wear D.N. Production economics of private forestry: a comparison of industrial and non-industrial forest owners. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75 3 (1993) 674-684
46. Nagubadi V., Mcnamara K.T., Hoover Jr. W.L., and Mills W.L. Program participation behaviour of nonindustrial forest landowners: a probit analysis. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 28 2 (1996) 323-336
47. Pattanayak S.K., Murray B.C., and Abt R. How joint in joint forest production: an econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. Forest Science 48 3 (2002) 479-491
48. Potter-Witter K. A cross-sectional analysis of Michigan nonindustrial private forest landowners. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 22 2 (2005) 132-138
49. Prada A., Vázquez M.X., and Soliño M. Beneficios y costes sociales en la conservación de la Red Natura 2000 (2005), Fundación Caixa Galicia, A Coruña, Spain
50. Prestemon J., and Wear D. Linking harvest choices to timber supply. Forest Science 46 3 (2000) 377-389
51. Ross-Davis A.L., Broussard S.R., Jacobs D.F., and Davis A.S. Afforestation motivations of private landowners: an examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 22 3 (2005) 149-153
52. Royer J.P. Surveying nonindustrial private forests and their owners. Nonindustrial private forests: data and information needs. Center for Resource and Environmental Policy Research, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies (1980), Duke University, Durham, NC
53. Ryan T.P. Modern Regression Methods (1997), John Wiley, New York The United States
54. Størdal S., Lien G., and Baardsen S. Analyzing determinants of forest owners' decision-making using a sample selection framework. Journal of Forest Economics 14 (2008) 159-176
55. Siry J.P., Cubbage F.W., and Ahmed M.R. Sustainable forest management: global trends andS opportunities. Forest Policy and Economics 5 (2005) 551-561
56. Sukhatme P.U. Sampling Theory of Surveys (1953), FAO, Rome, Italy
57. Van Gossum P., Luyssaert S., Serbruyns I., and Mortier F. Forest groups as support to private forest owners in developing close-to-nature management. Forest Policy and Economics 7 (2005) 589-601
58. Wear D., and Parks P. The economics of timber supply: an analytical synthesis of modelling approaches. Natural Resource Modelling 8 3 (1994) 199-223
59. Wiersum K.F., Elands B.H.M., and O'Leary T.N. Landowners' perspectives on the future of rural Europe: consequences for farm forestry. In: von Teuffel K. (Ed). Proceedings of the International Symposium on Contributions of Family-Farm Enterprises to Sustainable Rural Development (2002), Gengenbach, Germany 13
60. Zhang D., and Flick W. Sticks, carrots and reforestation investment. Land Economics 77 3 (2001) 443-456
61. Zhang D., and Mehmood S.R. Predicting non-industrial private forest landowners' choice of a forester for harvesting and tree planting assistance in Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 25 3 (2001) 101-107
62. Zhang D., and Pearse P. Differences in silvicultural investment under various types of forest tenure in British Columbia. Forest Science 42 4 (1997) 442-449