Impact of the Amenity Value of Urban Green Space on the Price of House in Shanghai

Shengtai Xuebao/ Acta Ecologica Sinica

Volumn 29, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 4492-4500

  Yin, Hai Wei ^a   Xu, Jian Gang ^a   Kong, Fan Hua ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Amenity value; Hedonic Price Model; Shanghai; Urban green space

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY; ECOLOGICAL APPROACH; ESTIMATION METHOD; GREENSPACE; HEDONIC ANALYSIS; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; NUMERICAL MODEL; POLICY MAKING; SOCIOECONOMIC CONDITIONS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN REGION;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; SHANGHAI;

EID: 70349325640     PISSN: 10000933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Wolf K L. Ergonomics of the City: Green Infrastructure and Social Benefits. In; C. Kollin ed. Engineering Green; Proceedings of the 11th National Urban Forest Conference. Washington D. C. : American Forests, 2003.110-115.
2. Yin H W, Kong F H. Spatio-temporal gradient analysis of urban green space in Jinan City, Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2005, 25 (11), 3010- 3021.
3. Tang Y. Planning of urban open space and its design. Planners, 2002, 18(10) : 21-27.
4. Zhang J X, Li Z G. Social and cultural significance of open space: evolution and new requirements of European cities. Urban Planning Overseas, 2004, 19(1): 24-28.
5. Liisa TyrvBinen. The amenity value of the urban forest; an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1997, 37; 211-222.
6. Gillard Q. The effect of environmental amenities on house values; the example of a view lot. Professional Geographer, 1981, 33(2) : 216-220.
7. Morancho A B. A hedonic valuation of urban green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2003, 66: 35-41.
8. Smith V K, Christine P, Hyun K. Treating open space as an urban amenity. Resource and Energy Economics, 2002, 24: 107-129.
9. Parsons G R. Hedonic prices and public goods. Journal of Urban Economy, 1990, 27: 308-321.
10. Garrod G D, Willis K G. Valuing 'goods' characteristics: an application of the hedonic price method to environmental attributes. Journal of Environment Management, 1992, 34: 59-76.
11. Sorg C F, Lootnis J B. Empirical estimates of amenity forest values; a comparative review (GTR RM-107). Fort Collins, CO: USDA Forest Service. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1984.
12. Clawson M, Knetsch V L. Economics of outdoor recreation. Baltimore, MD; John Hopkins University Press, 1966.
13. Walsh R G, Bjonback R D, Aiken R A, Rosenthal D H. Estimating the public benefits of protecting forest quality. Journal of Environment Management, 1990, 30 (2): 175-189.
14. Dwyer J F, Peterson G L, Darragh A J. Estimating the value of urban forests using the travel cost method. Journal of Arboriculture, 1983, 9: 182-185.
15. Smith V K, Kopp R J. The spatial limits of the travel cost recreational demand model. Land Economy, 1980, 56 (1), 64-72.
16. Smith V K, Desvousges W H, Fisher A. A comparison of direct and indirect methods for estimating environmental benefits. America Journal of Agricultural Economy, 1986, 68 (2) : 280-290.
17. Smith V K. Travel cost demand models for wilderness recreation; a problem of non-nested hypotheses. Land Economy, 1975, 51 (2): 103-111.
18. Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem. Nat. Res. J. , 1963, 3 (2) : 239-249.
19. Jackson J E. Measuring the demand for environmental quality with survey data. Journal of Politics, 1983, 45 (2) : 335-350.
20. Seip K, Strand J. Willingness to pay for environmental goods in Norway; a contingent valuation study with real payment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 1992, 2: 91-106.
21. Venkatachalam L. The contingent valuation method; a review. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2004, 24: 89-124.
22. Hausman J A. Contingent valuation; a critical assessment. Amsterdam; North Holland, 1993.
23. Tyrväinen L, Väänänen H. The economic value of urban forest amenities; an application of the contingent valuation method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 1998, 43: 105-118.
24. Griliches Z. ed. Price Indexes and Quality Change. Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press, 1971.
25. Rosen S. Hedonic prices and explicit markets; production differentiation in pure competition. J. Pol. Econ. , 1974, 82: 34-55.
26. Bartik T J. Measuring the benefits of amenity improvements in hedonic price models. Land Economy, 1988, 64 (2): 172- 183.
27. Braden J B, Kolstad C D, Miltz D. Introduction. In; J. B. Braden and C. D. Kolstad, eds. Measuring the demand for environmental quality. 3- 15. Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (North-Holland), 1991.
28. Basu S, Thibodeau T G. Analysis of spatial autocorrelation in housing prices. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 1998, 17 :66-95.
29. Mok H M K. A hedonic approach to pricing of residential properties in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Journal of Business Management, 1995,8:1-15.
30. Tse R Y C, Love P E D. Measuring residential property values in Hong Kong. Property Management, 2000, 18(5) :366-374.
31. Lee Chang-Moo, Peter Linneman. Dynamics of the greenbelt amenity effect on the land market; the case of Seoul's Greenbelt. Real Estate Economics, 1998, 26(1): 107-129. (Pubitemid 128342738)
32. Edmonds R. A theretical basis for hedonic regression: a research primer. Areuea Journal, 1984, 12(1): 72-85.
33. Ma S X, Li A. House price and its determinations in Beijing based on hedonic model. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2003, 36 (9): 59-64.
34. Wen H Z, Jia S H. Housing characteristics and hedonic price: analysis based on hedonic price model. Journal of Zhejiang University (Engineering Science), 2004, 38(10): 1338-1343.
35. Wu Y Z. CIS-based exploratory data analysis on the spatial-temporal evolvement of urban housing price and its application, the doctoral thesis of Zhejiang University, 2005.
36. Guo W G, Cui X M, Wen H Z. Hedonic price analysis of urban housing: the experiential research on the Hangzhou City. Economic Geography, 2006,26: 172-176.
37. Gu J. Urban growth and the spatial structure evolution of urban land, housing price-a case study of Hangzhou city, the doctoral thesis of Zhejiang University, 2006.
38. Zhou G H. The micro factors and empirical research on urban land Price, the doctoral thesis of Zhejiang University, 2004.
39. Wang X Y. The research of housing characteristic price in Shanghai based on hedonic model, the doctoral thesis of Tongji University, 2006.
40. Wang D, Huang W S. Hedonic house pricing method and its application in urban studies. City Planning Review, 2005 , 29(3) : 62-71.
41. Wang D, Huang W S. Effect of urban environment on residential property values by hedonic method; a case study of Shanghai. City Planning Review, 2007, 31(9): 34-43.
42. Shao F B, Zhang X. Analysis of the factors that influence housing prices of Shanghai based on hedonic model. Economic Tribune, 2007,23;9-13.
43. Zhang M, Chen S M. Empirical analysis of the Shanghai real estate prices based on hedonic pricing theory. Finance &Economy, 2008,6:72-74.
44. Fanhua Kong, Haiwei Y, Nobukazu Nakagoshi. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79(3-4):240-252.
45. Bolitzer B, Netusil N R. The impact of open space on property values in Portland. Journal of Environmental Management, 2000, 59 (3): 185-193.
46. Doss C R, Taff S J. The influence of wetland type and wetland proximity on residential property values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1996, 21: 120-129.
47. Yin H W, Kong F H. Accessibility analysis of urban green space in Jinan. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2006, 30(1) : 17-24.
48. Lutzenhiser M, Netusil N R. The effect of open spaces on a Home's Sale Price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 2001, 19 (July) : 291-298
49. Geoghegan J, Wainger LA, Bockstael N E. Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework; an ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 1997, 23(3) : 251-264.
50. Luck M, Wu J. A gradient analysis of urban landscape pattern; a case study from the Phoenix metropolitan region of USA: Landscape Ecology, 2002, 17: 327-339.
51. Li H, Wu J G. Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19: 389-399.