In vitro experimental study of the relationship between the apparent diffusion coefficient and changes in cellularity and cell morphology

Oncology Reports

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 641-648

  Matsumoto, Yoshitsugu ^a   Kuroda, Masahiro ^a   Matsuya, Ryohei ^a   Kato, Hirokazu ^a   Shibuya, Koichi ^a   Oita, Masataka ^a   Kawabe, Atsushi ^a   Matsuzaki, Hidenobu ^a   Asaumi, Junichi ^a   Murakami, Jun ^a   Katashima, Kazunori ^a   Ashida, Masakazu ^a   Sasaki, Takanori ^a   Sei, Tetsuro ^a   Kanazawa, Susumu ^a   Mimura, Seiichi ^b   Oono, Seiichiro ^b   Kitayama, Takuichi ^b   Tahara, Seiji ^b   Inamura, Keiji ^b  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

ADC value; Diffusion weighted image; Extracellular space; Intracellular space; MRI; Phantom

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ENCAPSULATION; EXTRACELLULAR FLUID; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TUMOR CELL; ULTRASOUND; DIFFUSION; IMAGE QUALITY; LEUKEMIA CELL LINE; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; TEMPERATURE;

DIFFUSION; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMANS; JURKAT CELLS; NEOPLASMS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 70349316740     PISSN: 1021335X     EISSN: 17912431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3892/or_00000484     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Sehy JV, Zhao L, Xu J, Rayala HJ, Ackerman JJ and Neil JJ: Effects of physiologic challenge on the ADC of intracellular water in the Xenopus oocyte. Magn Reson Med 52: 239-247, 2004.
2. Moffat BA, Hall DE, Stojanovska J, et al: Diffusion imaging for evaluation of tumor therapies in preclinical animal models. Magn Reson Mat Phys Biol Med 17: 249-259, 2004.
3. Moffat BA, Chenevert TL, Lawrence TS, et al: Functional diffusion map: a non-invasive MRI biomarker for early stratification of clinical brain tumor response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 5524-5529, 2005.
4. Jordan BF, Runquist M, Raghunand N, et al: Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion MRI show rapid and dramatic changes in tumor microenvironment in response to inhibition of HIF-1A using PX-478. Neoplasia 7: 475-485, 2005.
5. Pui MH and Wang Y: Diffusion and magnetization transfer MRI of brain infarct, infection, and tumor in children. Clin Imaging 29: 162-171, 2005.
6. Sugahara T, Korogi Y, Kochi M, et al: Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 53-60, 1999.
7. Mürtz P, Krautmacher C, Träber F, Gieseke J, Schild HH and Willinek WA: Diffusion-weighted whole-body MR imaging with background body signal suppression: a feasibility study at 3.0 Tesla. Eur Radiol 17: 3031-3037, 2007.
8. Schoeniger JS, Aiken N, Hsu E and Blackband SJ: Relaxation-time and diffusion NMR microscopy of single neurons. J Magn Reson 103: 261-273, 1993.
9. Galons JP, Lope-Piedrafita S, Divijak JL, Corum C, Gillies RJ and Trouard TP: Uncovering of intracellular water in cultured cells. Magn Reson Med 54: 79-86, 2005.
10. Sehy JV, Ackerman JJ and Neil JJ: Apparent diffusion of water, ions and small molecules in the Xenopus oocyte is consistent with brownian displacement. Magn Reson Med 48: 42-51, 2002.
11. Koh DM and Collins DJ: Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. Am J Roentgenol 188: 1622-1635, 2007.
12. Lyng H, Haraldseth O and Rofstad EK: Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 43: 828-836. 2000.
13. Lauffer MA: Motion in viscous liquids: simplified derivations of the Stokes and Einstein equations. J Chem Educ 58: 250-256, 1981.
14. Kang HW, Josephson L, Petrovsky A, Weissleder R and Bogdanov A: Magnetic resonance imaging of inducible E-selectin expression in human endothelial cell culture. Bioconjugate Chem 13: 122-127, 2002.
15. Weissleder R, Simonova M, Bogdanova A, Bredow S, Enochs WS and Bogdanov A Jr: MR imaging and scintigraphy of gene expression through melanin induction. Radiology 204: 425-429, 1997.
16. Schmalbrock P, Hines JV, Lee SM, Ammar GM and Kwok EW: T1 measurements in cell cultures: a new tool for characterizing contrast agents at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging 14: 636-648, 2001.
17. Fleige G, Noltey C, Synowitzy M, Seeberger F, Kettenmann H and Zimmery C: Magnetic labeling of activated microglia in experimental gliomas. Neoplasia 3: 489-499, 2001.
18. Frank JA, Miller BR, Arbab AS, et al: Clinically applicable labeling of mammalian and stem cells by combining super-paramagnetic iron oxides and transfection agents. Radiology 228: 480-487, 2003.
19. Billotey C, Wilhelm C, Devaud M, Bacri JC, Bittoun J and Gazeau F: Cell internalization of anionic maghemite nanoparticles: quantitative effect on magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 49: 646-654, 2003.
20. Planchamp C, Ivancevic MK, Pastor CM, et al: Hollow fiber bioreactor: new development for the study of contrast agent transport into hepatocytes by magnetic resonance imaging. Biotechnol Bioeng 85: 656-665. 2004.
21. Jansson PE, Lindberg B and Sandford PA: Structural studies of gellan gum, an extracellular polysaccharide elaborated by Pseudomonas elodea. Carbohydr Res 124: 135-139, 1983.
22. O'Neill MA, Selvendran RR and Morris VJ: Structure of the acidic extracellular gelling polysaccharide produced by Pseudomonas elodea. Carbohydr Res 124: 123-133, 1983.
23. Kuo MS, Mort AJ and Dell A: Identification and location of L-glycerate, an unusual acyl substituent in gellan gum. Carbohydr Res 156: 173-187, 1986.
24. Chandrasekaran R, Radha A and Thailambal VG: Roles of potassium ions, acetyl and L-glyceryl groups in native gellan double helix: an X-ray study. Carbohydr Res 224: 1-17, 1992.
25. Hales TC: A proof of the Kepler conjecture. Ann Math 162: 1065-1185, 2005.