Female reproductive strategy predicts preferences for sexual dimorphism in male faces

Journal of Evolutionary Psychology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 211-224

  Moore, Fhionna ^a   Smith, Miriam ^b   Cassidy, Clare ^b   Perrett, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERTAY DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Face preferences; Mate preferences; Reproductive strategies; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349310451     PISSN: 17892082     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1556/JEP.7.2009.3.2     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Benson, P. J. and Perrett, D. I. (1993): Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception, 22, 257-262.
2. Berry, D. S. and Mcarthur, L. (1985): Some components and consequences of a babyface. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 312-323.
3. Blurton Jones, N. (1986): Bushman birth spacing: a test for optimal interbirth intervals. Ethology and Sociobiology 7, 91-105.
4. Boothroyd, L. G., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M. and Perrett, D. I. (2007): Partner characteristics associated with masculinity, health and maturity in male faces. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1161-1173.
5. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (1998): Brothers and sisters: how sibling interactions affect optimal parental allocations. Human Nature 9, 119-162.
6. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2000): Optimizing offspring: The quantity - quality tradeoff in agropastoral Kipsigis. Evolution and Human Behavior 21, 391-410.
7. Buss, D. M. (1989): Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
8. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K. and Leblanc, G. J. (2000): Number of children desired and preferred spousal age difference: Context-specific mate preference patterns across 37 cultures. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 323-331.
9. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P. and Pike, C. L. (1990): What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61-72.
10. Debruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Smith, F. G. and Little, A. C. (in press): Are attractive men's faces masculine or feminine? The importance of controlling confounds in face stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance .
11. Enlow, A. H. (1990): Facial Growth . Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company.
12. Fink, B. and Penton-Voak, I. S. (2002): Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 154-158.
13. Gangestad, S. W. and Simpson, A. S. (2000): The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573-587.
14. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, A. S., Cousins, A. J., Garver - Apgar, C. E. and Christensen, P. N. (2004): Women's preferences for male behavioural displays change across the menstrual cycle. Psychological Science, 15, 203-207.
15. Hill, R. (1945). Campus values in mate selection. Journal of Home Economics, 37, 554-558.
16. Hill, K. and Hurtado, A. M. (1996): Ache Life History: Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People . Hawthorne: Aldine de Gruyter.
17. Hill, K. and Kaplan, H. (1988): Trade-offs in male and female reproductive strategies among the Ache, Part 1. In: L. Betzig, P. Turke, and M. Borgerhoff Mulder (eds), Human Reproductive Behavior . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 277-290.
18. Hill, S. E. and Reeve, H. K. (2004): Mating games: The evolution of human mating transactions. Behavioural Ecology, 15, 748-756.
19. Jones, B. C., Debruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R. and Law Smith, M. J. (2008): Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 78-84.
20. Kaplan, H. (1996): A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology 39, 91-135.
21. Kaplan, H. and Lancaster, J. B. (2003): An evolutionary and ecological analysis of human fertility, mating patterns and parental investment. In: K. W. Wachter and R. A. Bulatao (eds), Offspring: Fertility Behavior in Biodemographic Perspective . Washington: National Academies Press, pp. 107-223.
22. Kruger, D. J. (2006): Male facial masculinity influences attributions of personality and reproductive strategy. Personal Relationships, 13, 451-463. (DOI 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00129.x)
23. Lack, D. (1947): The significance of clutch-size. Ibis 89, 302-352.
24. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. and Perrett, D. I. (2001): Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268, 39-44.
25. Little, A. C., Cohen, D., Jones, B. C. and Belsky, J. (2007): Human preferences for facial masculinity change with relationship type and environmental harshness. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 967-973.
26. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. and Perrett, D. I. (2002): Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B, 269, 1095-1100.
27. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Waitt, C., Tiddeman, B. P., Feinberg, D. R., Perrett, D. I., Apicella, C. and Marlowe, F. W. (2008): Symmetry is related to sexual dimorphism in faces: data across culture and species. PLoS ONE, 3, e2106.
28. Little, A. C. and Mannion, H. D. (2006): Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex images affects preferences for sexual dimorphism in opposite-sex faces. Animal Behaviour, 72, 981-987.
29. Little, A. C. and Perrett, D. I. (2002): Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder: Evolution and individual differences in face preference. The Psychologist, 15, 28-32.
30. Low, B. S. (2000): Why Sex Matters: A Darwinian Look at Human Behavior . Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
31. Low, B. S. (2005). Women's lives there, here, then, now: A review of women's ecological and demographic constraints cross-culturally. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 64-87.
32. Newson, L., Postmes, T., Lea, S. E. G. and Webley, P. (2005): Why are modern families small? Toward an evolutionary and cultural explanation for the demographic transition. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 360-375
33. Penton-Voak, I. S., Cahill, S., Pound, N., Kempe, V., Schaeffler, S. and Schaeffler, F. (2007): Male facial attractiveness, perceived personality, and child-directed speech. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 253-259.
34. Penton-Voak, I. S. and Chen, J. Y : (2004): High salivary testosterone is linked to masculine male facial appearance in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 229-241.
35. Penton-Voak, I. S., Perrett, D. I., Castles, D. L., Kobayashi, T., Burt, D. M., Murray, L. K. and Minamisawa, R. (1999): Female preference for male faces changes cyclically. Nature, 399, 741-742.
36. Penton-Voak, I. S., Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Burt, D. M., Tiddeman, B. P. and Perrett, D. I. (2003). Female condition influences preferences for sexual dimorphism in faces of male humans (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 117, 264-271.
37. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, P., Castles, D. L. and Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
38. Rhodes, G., Hickford, C. and Jeffery, L. (2000): Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces superattractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91, 125-140.
39. Rhodes, G., Simmons, L. and Peters, M. (2005): Attractiveness and sexual behavior: Does attractiveness enhance mating success? Evolution & Human Behavior, 26, 186-201.
40. Roberts, M. L., Buchanen, K. L. and Evans, M. R. (2004): Testing the immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: A review of the evidence. Animal Behaviour, 68, 227-239.
41. Roney, J. R., Hanson, K. N., Durante, K. N. and Maestripieri, D. (2006): Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgements track men's testosterone and interest in infants. Proceedings of the Royal Society Series B, 273, 2169-2175.
42. Scott, I., Swami, V., Josephson, S. C. and Penton - Voak, I. S. (2008): Context-dependent preferences for facial dimorphism in a rural Malaysian population. Evolution and Human Behavior, in press.
43. Sear, R., Mace, R. and Mcgregor, I. A. (2003): The effects of kin on female fertility in rural Gambia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 25-42.
44. Tiddeman, B. T., Burt, D. M. and Perrett, D. I. (2001): Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. Computer Graphics and Applications, 21, 42-50.
45. Vanderschueren, D. and Bouillon, R. (1995): Androgens and bone. Calcified Tissue International, 56, 341-346.