Compromised need and the label effect: an examination of claims and evidence

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 2004-2009

  Nicolaisen, Jeppe ^a  

^a ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL FACTS; IN-DEPTH INTERVIEWS; INFORMATION NEED; TECHNICAL PROBLEM;

LIBRARIES;

LABELS;

EID: 70349306408     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21129     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Belkin, N.J. (1984). Cognitive models and information transfer. Social Science Information Studies, 4, 111-129.
2. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., & Brooks, H.M. (1982). Ask for information retrieval: Part II. Results of a design study. Journal of Documentation, 38(3), 145-164.
3. Borlund, P. (2000). Evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Aabo, Finland: Aabo Akademi University Press.
4. Bruce, H. (2005). Personal, anticipated information need. Information Research, 10(3), paper 232. Retrieved May 29, 2009, from http://InformationR. net/ir/10-3/paper232.html
5. Chalmers, A.F. (1982). What is this thing called science? Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
6. Collins, H.M. (1992). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Daniels, P.J., Brooks, H.M., & Belkin, N.J. (1985). Using problem structures for driving human-computer dialogues. In Proceedings of the RIAO '85 Conference (pp. 645-660). Grenoble, France: IMAC
8. Ericsson, K., & Simon, H.A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Freund, L., & Toms, E.G. (2002). A preliminary contextual analysis of the Web query process. In L.C Howarth, C. Cronin, & A.T Slawek (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Canadian Association for Information Science (pp. 72-84). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto.
10. Frohmann, B. (1992). The power of images: A discourse analysis of the cognitive viewpoint. Journal of Documentation, 48(4), 365-386.
11. Gould, S.J. (1996). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Three Rivers Press.
12. Hauptman, R. (1987). The myth of the reference interview. The Reference Librarian, 16, 47-52.
13. Hjørland, B. (1993). Emnerepraesentation og Informationssø gning: Bidrag til en Teori påKundskabsteoretisk Grundlag. [Subject representation and information seeking: A theoretical contribution]. Göteborg, Sweden: Centrum for Biblioteksoch Informationsvetenskap.
14. Hjørland, B. (1997). Information seeking and subject representation: An activity-theoretical approach to information science. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
15. Hyldegaard, J. (1994). Kvalitet i referenceinterviewet. [Quality in the reference interview]. Referencen, 1, 13-18.
16. Ingwersen, P. (1982). Search procedures in the library-analysed from the cognitive point of view. Journal of Documentation, 38(3), 165-191.
17. Ingwersen, P. (1986). Cogntive analysis and the role of the intermediary in information retrieval (pp. 206-237). In R. Davies (Ed.). Intelligent information systems. Chichester, UK: Horwood.
18. Ingwersen, P. (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham.
19. Ingwersen, P. (1999). Cognitive information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 3-52.
20. Ingwersen, P., & Järvelin (2005). The turn: Integration of information seeking and retrieval in context. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
21. Ingwersen, P., & Kaae, S. (1980). User-librarian negotiations and information search procedures in public libraries: Analysis of verbal protocols, final report. Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal School of Librarianship.
22. Ingwersen, P., & Wormell, I. (1990). Informations for midling i Teori og Praksis. [Information retrieval interaction in theory and practice]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.
23. Jahoda, G., Brunagel, J., & Nath, H. (1976). The reference process: Modules for instruction. Preliminary ed. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University, School of Library Science.
24. Kirkegaard, B. (2008). Metadata elements preferred in searching and assessing relevance of archived television broadcast by scholars and students in media studies: Towards the design of surrogate records. Aalborg, Denmark: Royal School of Library and Information Science.
25. Lynch, M.J. (1978). Reference interviews in public libraries. Library Quarterly, 48, 119-142.
26. Markey, K. (1981). Levels of question formulation in negotiation of information need during the online presearch interview: A proposed model. Information Processing & Management, 17(5), 215-225.
27. Merton, R.K. ([1942] 1973). The normative structure of science. In R.K. Merton (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267-278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Mizzaro, S. (1998). How many relevances in information retrieval? Interacting with Computers, 10(3), 305-322.
29. Mount, E. (1966). Communication services and the reference question. Special Libraries, 57, 575-578.
30. Nolin, J (2007). What's in a turn? Information Research, 12(4). Retrieved May 29, 2009, from http://InformationR.net/ir/12-4/colis/colisll.html
31. Nordlie, R. (1999). "User revealment": A comparison of initial queries and ensuing question development in online searching and in human reference interactions. In M. Hearst, F. Gey, & R. Tong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (pp. 11-18). Berkeley, CA: University of California.
32. Sandstrom, A.R., & Sandstrom, P.E. (1995). The use and misuse of anthropological methods in library and information science research. Library Quarterly, 65(2), 161-199.
33. Skov, M. (2009). The reinvented museum: Exploring information seeking behaviour in a digital museum context. Copenhagen, Denmark: Royal School of Library and Information Science.
34. Smyth, B., & Balfe, E. (2006). Anonymous personalization in collaborative Web search. Information Retrieval, 9(2), 165-190.
35. Taylor, R.S. (1962). The process of asking questions. American Documentation, 13, 391-396.
36. Taylor, R.S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
37. Thagard, RR. (1978). Why astrology is a pseudoscience. PSA, 1, 223-234.
38. Xie, H. (2008). Interactive information retrieval in digital environments. Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.