Personal, anticipated information need

Information Research

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2005, Pages

  Bruce, Harry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 21244481701     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bates, M. (2002). Toward an integrated model of information seeking and searching: studies of information seeking in context. New Review of Information Behavior Research, 3 1-16.
2. Belkin, N.J. (1984). Cognitive models and information transfer. Social Science Information Studies, 4, 111-129.
3. Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., & Brooks, H.M. (1982). ASK for information retrieval: part 1. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2), 61-71.
4. Bellotti, V. & Smith, I. (2000). Informing the design of an information management system with iterative fieldwork. In D. Boyarski & W. Kellogg (Eds.), Proceedings of the DIS 2000 conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 227-237). New York, NY: ACM Press.
5. Bovey, J. D. (1996). Event-based personal retrieval. Journal of Information Science, 22(5), 357-366.
6. Broadus, R. (1981). Selecting materials for libraries. New York, NY: H. W. Wilson.
7. Bush, V. (1945). As we may think. Atlantic Monthly, 176(1) 101-108.
8. Case, D. O. (2002). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs, and behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Dervin, B. (1992). From the mind's eye of the 'user': the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology. In Glazier, J.D. & Powell, R.R. (Eds.), Qualitative research in information management (pp. 61-84). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
10. Dervin, B. (1996). Information needs and information seeking: the search for questions behind the research agenda. UCLA-NSF Workshop on Social Aspects of Digital Libraries. Retrieved 17 September, 2004 from http://is.gseis.ucla.edu/ research/dl/
11. Dervin, B., & Nilan, M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 21, 3-33.
12. Drury, F. (1930). Book selection. Chicago. IL: American Library Association.
13. Eisenberg, M.B. (1988). Measuring relevance judgments. Information Processing and Management, 24(4), 373-389.
14. Fidel, R. (1994). User-centered indexing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(8), 572-576.
15. Grunig, J. (1989). Publics, audience and market segments: segmentation principles for campaigns. In C. Salmon (Ed.), Information Campaigns: Balancing Social Values and Social Change (pp. 199-228). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16. Hewins, E. T. (1990). Information need and use studies. Annual Review of Science and Technology, 25, 145-172.
17. Hjørland, B. (2001). Towards a theory of aboutness, subject, topicality, theme, domain, field, content...and relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(9), 774-778.
18. Ingwersen: (1992). Information retrieval interaction. London: Taylor Graham Publishing.
19. Ingwersen: (1999). Cognitive information retrieval. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 34, 3-52.
20. Janes, J. W. (1991). Relevance judgments and the incremental presentation of document representations. Information Processing & Management, 27(6), 629-646.
21. Jones, W., Bruce, H., & Dumais, S. (2001). Keeping found things found on the Web. In H. Paques, L. Liu, D. Grossman (Eds.), Proceedings of CIKM'01: the tenth international conference on Information and knowledge management (pp 119-126). New York, NY: ACM Press.
22. Jones, W., Dumais, S., & Bruce, H. (2002). Once found, what then?: a study of 'keeping' behaviours in the personal use of Web information. In E.G. Toms (Ed.), Proceedings of ASIST '02, the annual conference of American society for information science and technology (pp. 391-402). Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.
23. Jones, W. (2004). Finders, keepers: the present and future perfect in support of personal information management. First Monday, 9(3). Retrieved 23 June, 2004 from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_3/jones/index.html
24. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1993). A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 339-355.
25. Kwasnik, B.H. (1991). The importance of factors that are not document attributes in the organization of personal documents. Journal of Documentation, 47(4), 389-398.
26. Lancaster, F. W. (1998). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
27. Malone, T. W. (1983). How do people organize their desks: implications for the design of office information-systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 1(1), 99-112.
28. McColvin, L. (1925). The theory of book selection for public libraries. London: Grafton.
29. McKnight, C. (2000). The personal construction of information space. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (8), 730-733.
30. Peterson, W.W., Birdsall, T.G., & Fox, W.C. (1954). The theory of signal delectability. Institute of Radio Engineers Transactions, PGIT-4171-212.
31. Pettigrew, K., Fidel, R., & Bruce, H. (2001). Conceptual frameworks in information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 35, 43-78.
32. Poole, H. (1985). Theories of the middle range. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
33. Pirolli, P. & Card, S. (1995). Information foraging in information access environments. Human factors in computing systems: CHI'95 Conference on Mosaic of Creativity. Denver, Colorado. Retrieved 23 June, 2004, from http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi95/Electronic/documnts/papers/ppp_bdy.htm
34. Sandstrom, E. (1999). Scholars as subsistence foragers. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science, 25(3) 17-20.
35. Sandstrom, E. (2004). Anthropological approaches to information systems and behavior. ASIST Bulletin, 30(3), 1-8. Retrieved 24 June, 2004, from http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-04/sandstrom.html
36. Saracevic, T., Kantor, P., Chamis, A.Y., & Trivison, D. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving, I: background and methodology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 161-76.
37. Spink, A., Greisdorf, H., & Bateman, J. (1998). From highly relevant to not relevant: examining different regions of relevance. Information Processing & Management, 34(5), 599-621.
38. Taylor, R.S. (1968). Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries. College and Research Libraries, 29, 178-194.
39. Vakkari, P. (1999). Task complexity, problem structure and information actions: integrating studies on information seeking and retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 35(6), 819-837.
40. Van Meter, D., & Middleton, D. (1954). Modern statistical approaches to reception in communication theory. Institute of Radio Engineers Transactions, PGIT-4 119-145.
41. Westbrook, L. (1997). User needs. In Encyclopedia of library and Information Science, 59(22), 316-347. New York, NY: Dekker.
42. Whittaker, S. & Hirschberg, J. (2001). The character, value and management of personal paper archives. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 8(2), 150-170.
43. Wilson, T.D. (1981). On user studies and information needs. Journal of Documentation, 37(1), 3-15.
44. Wilson, T.D. (2000). Human information behavior. Informing Science, 3(2), 49-55.
45. Zipf, G.K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort: an introduction to human ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Press.