Evaluation of multi-plate microbial assay for the screening of antibacterial residues in poultry muscle

European Journal of Scientific Research

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 311-317

  Karraouan, Bouchra ^a   Bouchrif, Brahim ^a   Ziyate, Nadia ^b   Talmi, Ali ^b   Yahia, Khadija Id Sidi ^b   Cohen, Nozha ^a   Fassouane, Abdelaziz ^c  

^a Institut Pasteur du Maroc   (Morocco)

^b Laboratoire National de ContrÔle des Médicaments   (Morocco)

^c FACULTÉ DES SCIENCES   (Morocco)

Author keywords

Antimicrobials; Meat; Microbiological method; Residues; Screening

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349301912     PISSN: 1450216X     EISSN: 1450202X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Levy, S., Fitzgerald G, Macone, A, 1976. Changes in intestinal flora of farm personnel afterintroduction of a tetracycline-supplemented feed on a farm, N Engl J Med,295, 583-8.
2. McDermott, P., Bodeis, S., English, L., et al, 2002. Ciprofloxacin resistance in Campylobacterejuni evolves rapidly in chickens treated with fluoroquinolones, J Infect Dis, 85, 837-40.
3. Anon., 1990. Council Regulation, (EEC), 2377/90, O.J., L224, 1.
4. Anon, 2002. Commission Decision 2002/657/EC, O.J., L221, 8.
5. Anon, 2004. Human health impact from antimicrobial use in food animals Conséquences sur lasanté humaine de l'utilisation d'antibiotiques dans l'alimentation animale Linda Tollefson, Beth E. Karp, Médecine et maladies infectieuses, 34, 514-521.
6. McDermott, P., Walker, R., White, D., 2003. Antimicrobials: modes of action and mechanismsof resistance, Int J Toxicol, 22,135-43.
7. Catry, B., Laevens, H., Devriese, L., et al,.2003, Antimicrobial resistance in livestock, J VetPharmacol Ther, 26, 81-93.
8. Levy, S., 2002. The antibiotic paradox: how the misuse of antibiotics destroys their curativepowers, Cambridge, MA. Perseus Publishing.
9. Levy, S., 1998. Multidrug resistance a sign of the times, N Engl J Med, 338, 1376-8.
10. Anon., 2002. Commission Decision, 2002/657/EC of 12 august implementing CouncilDirective 96/23/EC concerning the performance of analytical methods and the interpretation ofresults, Official Journal of the European Communities, L 221, 8-28.
11. McDermott, P., Walker, R., White, D., 2003. Antimicrobials: modes of action and mechanismsof resistance, Int J Toxicol, 22,135-43.
12. Van Egmond, H., 2004. The 6 plate test: Screening on banned antibiotics in completefeedingstuffs, milk replacers and mineral feeds, Competitive and sustainable growth programme - Screening and identification methods for official control of banned antibiotics and growth promoters in feedingstuffs. Laboratory Instruction, Institute of Food Safety, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
13. Yamada, Y., Sasaki, J., Matsuzaki, T. and Shiiki, K, 1981. Influence of medium and diluent pHand diffusion time on antibiotic bioassay, Tokai J.Exp. Clin. Med, 6, 23-33.
14. De Zutter, L., Koenen-Dierick, K. and van Hoof, J, 1985. Detection of antimicrobial residues inslaughtered animals, II. Sensitivity of some detection methods to different antibiotics. Vlaams Diergeneesk. Tijdschr, 54, 445-454.
15. Amsterdam, A., 1996. Susceptibility Testing of Antibiotics in Liquid Media, In: Lorian, V.(ed.) Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine, Williams & Wilkins, MA, USA, pp. 52-111.
16. Barry, A. L., and Effinger, L. J., 1974. Performance of Mueller-Hinton agars prepared by threemanufacturers, J. Am. Clin. Pathol, 62, 113-117.
17. Barry, A. L., 1976. Agar diffusion: general considerations. In: Barry, A. L., (ed.) The antimicrobic susceptibility test: principles and practices, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA,USA, pp, 163-179.
18. Higgins, H.C., McEvoy, J.D.G., Lynas L., Fagan N.P, 1999. Evaluation of a single platemicrobiological growth inhibition assay as a screening test for the presence of antimicrobial agents in compound animal feedingstuffs at therapeutic and contaminating concentrations. Food Addit Contam, 16, 543-554.
19. Gudding, R., 1976. An improved bacteriological method for the detection of sulfonamideresidues in food, Acta Vet. Scand, 17, 458-464.
20. Fabiansson, S., and Rutegård, Å., 1979. A modified method for the detection of antibioticresidues in slaughter animals, Acta Vet. Scand, 20, 477-491.
21. Bogaerts, R., De Groodt, J. M., and De Vos, D., 1981. An ultra-sensitive microbiologicalmethod for the semi-quantitative detection of low-level sulfonamides, J. Food Sci. 46, 158-160.
22. Søgaard, H., 1979. An improved microbiological procedure for detection of streptomycin residues in milk and animal tissues, Acta Vet. Scand, 20, 38-44.
23. Okerman, L., De Wasch, K., van Hoof, J. and Smedts, W., 2003. Simultaneous determinationof different antibiotic residues in bovine and in porcine kidneys by solid-phase fluorescence immunoassay, J. AOAC. Int, 86, 236-240
24. Anon., 1999. National Research Council, The use of drugs in food animals. Washington, D.C.National Academy Press.
25. World Health Organization., 2000. WHO global principles for the containment ofantimicrobial resistance in animals intended for food: report of a WHO consultation. Geneva, 5-9 June,.Available online at:
26. http://www.who.int/emc/diseases/zoo/who_global_principles/index.html.
27. World Health Organization., 1997. The medical impact of the use of antimicrobials in foodanimals. Report of a WHO meeting, WHO/EMC/ZOO/97.4, Berlin, Germany,13-17 October.Availableonlineat:http://www.who.int/emcdocuments/antimicrobial_resistance/whoem czoo974c.html.
28. World Health Organization., 1998. Use of quinolones in food animals and potential impact onhuman health. Report of a WHO meeting, WHO/EMC/ZDI/98.10, Geneva, Switzerland, 2-5June, Available online at: http://www.who.int/emc-documents/zoonoses/whoemczdi9810c.html.
29. Anna-Liisa Myllyniemi, a Lasse Nuotio,b Erja Lindfors,c Riitta Rannikko,c Anneli Niemic and Christina Bäckmanc A microbiological six-plate method for the identification of certain antibiotic groups in incurred kidney and muscle samples, Analyst, 2001, 126, 641-646