Informing parents about expanded newborn screening: Influences on provider involvement

Pediatrics

Volumn 124, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 950-958

  Hayeems, Robin Z ^a   Miller, Fiona A ^a   Little, Julian ^b   Carroll, June C ^c   Allanson, Judith ^b,d   Chakraborty, Pranesh ^b,d   Wilson, Brenda J ^b   Bytautas, Jessica P ^a   Christensen, Robert J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^d CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF EASTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Newborn screening; Professional attitudes; Public policy; Survey design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; MIDWIFE; NEWBORN SCREENING; NURSE; PEDIATRICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NEONATAL SCREENING; PARENTS;

EID: 70349264089     PISSN: 00314005     EISSN: 10984275     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-3148     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mandl KD, Shlomit F, Larson C, Kohane IS. Newborn screening program practices in the United States: notification, research, and consent. Pediatrics. 2002;109(2):269-273 (Pubitemid 34126868)
2. Hiller EH, Landenburger G, Natowicz MR. Public participation in medical policy-making and the status of consumer autonomy: the example of newborn-screening programs in the United States. Am J Public Health. 1997;87(8):1280-1288 (Pubitemid 27358021)
3. Avard D, Vallance H, Greenberg C, Laberge C, Kharaboyan L, Plant M. Variability in the storage and use of newborn dried bloodspots in canada: is it time for national standards? Genomics Soc Policy. 2006;2(3):80-95
4. Grosse SD, Boyle CA, Kenneson A, Khoury MJ, Wilfond BS. From public health emergency to public health service: the implications of evolving criteria for newborn screening panels. Pediatrics. 2006;117(3):923-929 (Pubitemid 46063236)
5. Department of Human Services V. Informed Parental Consent for Newborn Screening in Victoria. Final Report. Victoria, Australia: Health Issues Centre; 2005
6. UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre. Newborn bloodspot screening in the UK: health professional handbook. 2005. Available at: http://newbornbloodspot. screening.nhs.uk/getdata.php? id=10953. Accessed July 16, 2009
7. Atkinson K, Zuckerman B, Sharfstein JM, et al. A public health response to emerging technology: expansion of the Massachusetts newborn screening program. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(2): 122-131 (Pubitemid 34033131)
8. American Academy of Pediatrics, Newborn Screening Task Force. Serving the family from birth to the medical home: newborn screening-a blueprint for the future: a call for a national agenda on state newborn screening programs. Pediatrics. 2000;106(2 pt 2):389-422
9. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion: newborn screening No. 287. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102(4):887-889
10. Hargreaves K, Stewart R, Oliver S. Informed choice and public health screening: the case of blood spot screening. Health Expectat. 2005;8(2):161-171 (Pubitemid 40780465)
11. Campbell E, Ross LF. Parental attitudes regarding newborn screening of PKU and DMD. Am J Med Genet. 2003;120A(2):209-214 (Pubitemid 37063798)
12. Davis TC, Humiston SG, Arnold CL, et al. Recommendations for effective newborn screening communication: results of focus groups with parents. providers, and experts. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(5 pt 2):S326-S340
13. Tluczek A, Koscik RL, Farrell PM, Rock MJ. Psychosocial risk associated with newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: parents' experience while awaiting the sweat-test appointment. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):1692-1703 (Pubitemid 43843181)
14. Yang Y-M, Andrews S, Peterson R, Shah A, Cepeda M. Prenatal sickle cell screening education effect on the follow-up rates of infants with sickle cell trait. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(2-3): 185-189 (Pubitemid 30004073)
15. Larsson A, Therrell BL. Newborn screening: the role of the obstetrician. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(3):697-710, discussion 730-732
16. Gabbe SG, Neibyl JR, Simpson JL. Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. 4th ed. New York, NY: Churchill Livingston; 2002
17. Pollitt RJ, Green A, McCabe CJ, et al. Neonatal screening for inform errors of metabolism: cost, yield, and outcome. Health Technol Assess. 1997;1:i-iv, 1-202
18. Green J, Hewison J, Bekker H, Bryant LD, Cuckle HS. Psychosocial aspects of genetic screening of pregnant women and newborns: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(33):iii, ix-x, 1-109 (Pubitemid 39214525)
19. Petticrew M, Sowden A, Lister-Sharp D, et al. False negative results in screening programmes: systematic review of impact and implications. Health Technol Assess. 2000;4:1-60 (Pubitemid 30209588)
20. Clayton EW. Talking with parents about newborn screening. J Pediatr. 2005;147(3 suppl):S26-S29
21. Kerruish NJ, Webster D, Dickson N. Information and consent for newborn screening: practices and attitudes of service providers. J Med Ethics. 2008;34(9):648-652
22. Hiraki S, Ormond KE, Kim K, Ross LF. Attitudes of genetic counselors towards expanding newborn screening and offering predictive genetic testing to children. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(21): 2312-2319 (Pubitemid 44684957)
23. Koopmans J, Hiraki S, Ross LF. Attitudes and beliefs of pediatricians and genetic counselors regarding testing and screening for CF and G6PD: implications for policy. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140(21):2305-2311 (Pubitemid 44684956)
24. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley; 2000
25. Provincial Perinatal Surveillance System Committee. Tailoring Services to Pregnant Women and Their Babies in Ontario: 2006 Provincial Perinatal Report. Ottawa, Ontario: Ontario Perinatal Program Partnership Committee; 2006