Development of CRIS: Measure of community reintegration of injured service members

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 469-480

  Resnik, Linda ^a,b,d   Plow, Matthew ^b   Jette, Alan ^c  

^a PROVIDENCE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Community reintegration; Disability measurement; International classification of functioning, disability and health; OIF OEF; Participation; Rasch analysis; Rehabilitation; Reliability; Validity; Veterans

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY REINTEGRATION; DISABILITY MEASUREMENT; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; OIF/OEF; PARTICIPATION; RASCH ANALYSIS; REHABILITATION; VALIDITY; VETERANS;

HEALTH; PATIENT REHABILITATION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SOUNDING APPARATUS; SURVEYS;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMMUNITY REINTEGRATION; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONSULTATION; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PILOT STUDY; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SHORT FORM 36; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; VETERAN; WORK; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFGHAN CAMPAIGN 2001-; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; UNITED STATES; VETERANS; WOUNDS AND INJURIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 70349244850     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2008.07.0082     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Litz B, Orsillo SM. The returning veteran of the Iraq war: Background issues and assessment guidelines. In: Iraq war clinician guide. 2nd ed. White River Junction (VT): U.S. National Center for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder; 2004. p. 21-32.
2. Doyle ME, Peterson KA. Re-entry and reintegration: Returning home after combat. Psychiatr Q. 2005;76(4): 361-370 [PMID: 16217631] DOI:10.1007/s11126- 005-4972-z
3. McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: Development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):429-434 [PMID: 11295000] DOI:10.1053/apmr.2001.22195 (Pubitemid 32289703)
4. Lew HL, Poole JH, Alvarez S, Moore W. Soldiers with occult traumatic brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(6):393-398 [PMID: 15905652] DOI:10.1097/01.phm.0000163703.91647.a7 (Pubitemid 40705782)
5. Hoge CW, Castro CA, Messer SC, McGurk D, Cotting DI, Koffman RL. Combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, mental health problems, and barriers to care. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(1):13-22. [PMID: 15229303] DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa040603 (Pubitemid 38857243)
6. Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS. Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. JAMA. 2006;295(9):1023-1032 [PMID: 16507803] DOI:10.1001/jama.295.9.1023
7. Minnes P, Buell K, Nolte ML, McColl MA, Carlson P, Johnston J. Defining community integration of persons with brain injuries as acculturation: A Canadian perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(1):3-10. [PMID: 11455098] (Pubitemid 32424230)
8. Whiteneck GG, Charlifue SW, Gerhart KA, Overholser JD, Richardson GN. Quantifying handicap: A new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):519-526 [PMID: 1622299]
9. Trigg R, Wood VA. The Subjective Index of Physical and Social Outcome (SIPSO): A new measure for use with stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(3):288-299 [PMID: 10868724] DOI:10.1191/026921500678119607 (Pubitemid 30330478)
10. Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Bickenbach J, Kostanjsek N, Schneider M. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A new tool for understanding disability and health. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12): 565-571 [PMID: 12959329]
11. Schuntermann MF. The implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Germany: Experiences and problems. Int J Rehabil Res. 2005;28(2):93-102. [PMID: 15900178] DOI:10.1097/00004356- 200506000-00001
12. Perenboom RJ, Chorus AM. Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disabil Rehabil. 2003; 25(11-12):577-587 [PMID: 12959331] DOI:10.1080/ 0963828031000137081
13. Resnik L, Plow MA. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: An evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(5):856-866 [PMID: 19406308] DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2008.11.010
14. Resnik LJ, Allen SM. Using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to understand challenges in community reintegration of injured veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2007;44(7):991-1006. [PMID: 18075956] DOI:10.1682/JRRD.2007.05.0071
15. Whiteneck G. Conceptual models of disability: Past, present, and future. In: Field MJ, Jette AM, Martin LG, editors. Workshop on disability in America: A new look. Summary and background papers. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2006. p. 50-66.
16. Jette AM, Tao W, Haley SM. Blending activity and participation sub-domains of the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2007; 29(22):1742-1750 [PMID: 17852234]
17. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288 [PMID: 16204405] DOI:10.1177/ 1049732305276687
18. Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3): 309-319 DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3. 309
19. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustün B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: An update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-218 [PMID: 16024476] DOI:10.1080/16501970510040263 (Pubitemid 41025328)
20. Cieza A, Brockow T, Ewert T, Amman E, Kollerits B, Chatterji S, Ustün TB, Stucki G. Linking health-status measurements to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. J Rehabil Med. 2002;34(5): 205-210 [PMID: 12392234] DOI:10.1080/165019702760279189
21. Brown M, Dijkers MP, Gordon WA, Ashman T, Charatz H, Cheng Z. Participation objective, participation subjective: A measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2004;19(6):459-481 [PMID: 15602309] DOI:10.1097/00001199-200411000-00004 (Pubitemid 44138910)
22. Johnston M, Nissim EN, Wood K, Hwang K, Tulsky D. Objective and subjective handicap following spinal cord injury: Interrelationships and predictors. J Spinal Cord Med. 2002;25(1):11-22. [PMID: 11939460] (Pubitemid 37486192)
23. Dubuc N, Haley SM, Kooyoomjian JT, Jette AM. Assessing disability in older adults: The effects of asking questions with and without health attribution. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36(5):226-231 [PMID: 15626163] DOI:10.1080/16501970410029780 (Pubitemid 39317469)
24. Jobe JB, Mingay DJ. Cognitive laboratory approach to designing questionnaires for surveys of the elderly. Public Health Rep. 1990;105(5):518-524 [PMID: 2120731]
25. Jobe JB, Mingay DJ. Cognitive research improves questionnaires. Am J Public Health. 1989;79(8):1053-1055 [PMID: 2751028] DOI:10.2105/AJPH.79.8.1053
26. Linacre JM, Wright BD. A user's guide to WinSteps. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1999.
27. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1979.
28. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86(2):420-428 [PMID: 18839484] DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
29. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kozinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide. Boston (MA): The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1993.
30. Brustein J. Back from Iraq. Gotham Gazette. 2006 Mar 19; Sect. 4.
31. Hooper TI, Debakey SF, Bellis KS, Kang HK, Cowan DN, Lincoln AE, Gackstetter GD. Understanding the effect of deployment on the risk of fatal motor vehicle crashes: A nested case-control study of fatalities in Gulf War era veterans, 1991-1995. Accid Anal Prev. 2006;38(3):518-525 [PMID: 16405857] DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2005.11.009
32. Linacre JM. Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;7:28.
33. DeMars CE. Sample size and the recovery of nominal response model item parameters. Appl Psychol Meas. 2003;27(4):275-288 DOI:10.1177/ 0146621603027004003
34. Rubenstein LM, Voelker MD, Chrischilles EA, Glenn DC, Wallace RB, Rodnitzky RL. The usefulness of the Functional Status Questionnaire and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form in Parkinson's disease research. Qual Life Res. 1998;7(4):279-290 [PMID: 9610212] DOI:10.1023/A:1008838317063
35. Ware JE Jr, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl):II73-82. [PMID: 10982092]
36. McHorney CA, Cohen AS. Equating health status measures with item response theory: Illustrations with functional status items. Med Care. 2000;38(9 Suppl):II43-59. [PMID: 10982089]
37. Hambleton RK. Emergence of item response modeling in instrument development and data analysis. Med Care. 2000; 38(9 Suppl):II60-65. [PMID: 10982090]