Factors associated with use of asam criteria and service provision in a national sample of outpatient substance abuse treatment units

Journal of Addiction Medicine

Volumn 3, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 139-150

  Chuang, Emmeline ^a   Wells, Rebecca ^a   Alexander, Jeffrey A ^b   Friedmann, Peter D ^c   Lee, I Heng ^a  

^a IL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ASAM; Key Words: substance abuse treatment; Managed care; Patient placement criteria; Treatment practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349241633     PISSN: 19320620     EISSN: 19353227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31818ebb6f     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Gastfriend DR, Lu S, Sharon E. Placement matching: challenges and technical progress. Subst Use Misuse. 2000;35:2191-2213.
2. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 13: The Role and Current Status of Patient Placement Criteria in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders. US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 1995.
3. Turner WM, Turner KH, Reif S, et al. Feasibility of multi-dimensional substance abuse treatment matching: automating the ASAM patient placement criteria. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999;55:35-43.
4. Mee-Lee D, Shulman GD, Fishman M, et al. ASAM Patient Placement Criteria for the Treatment of Substance-Related Disorders, Second Edition-Revised (ASAM PPC-2R). Chevy Chase, MD: American Society of Addition Medicine, Inc; 2001.
5. Mee-Lee D. ASAM's placement criteria: what's new. Behav Health Manag. 2005;25:32-34.
6. Levine HJ, Turner W, Reif S, et al. Determining service variations between and within ASAM levels of care. J Addict Dis. 2003;22(suppl 1):9-25.
7. Sharon E, Krebs C, Turner W, et al . Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for hospital utilization. J Addict Dis. 2003; 22(suppl 1);79-93.
8. Magura S, Staines G, Kosanke N, et al. Predictive validity of the ASAM patient placement criteria for naturalistically matched vs. mismatched alcoholism patients. Am J Addict. 2003;12:386-397.
9. Kosanke N, Magura S, Staines G, et al. Feasibility of matching alcohol patients to ASAM levels of care. Am J Addict. 2002;11:124-134.
10. O'Toole TP, Freyder PJ, Gibbon JL, et al. ASAM patient placement criteria treatment levels: do they correspond to care actually received by homeless substance abusing adults? J Addict Dis. 2004;23:1-15.
11. Heatherton B. Implementing the ASAM criteria in community treatment centers in Illinois: opportunities and challenges. JAddict Dis. 2000;19: 109-116.
12. Treatment Episode Dataset (TEDS). National Admissions to Substance Abuse Treatment Services, Chapter 3: Characteristics of Admissions. US Department of Health and Human Services. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2005.
13. Steenrod S, Brisson A, McCarty D, et al. Effects of managed care on programs and practices for the treatment of alcohol and drug dependence. In: Galanter M, ed. Services Research in the Era of Managed Care: Organization, Access, Economics, and Outcomes. New York: Springer; 2001; 51-70.
14. Harrison PA, Hoffmann NG, Hollister CD, et al. Determinants of chemical dependency treatment placement: clinical, economic, and logistic factors. Psychotherapy. 1988;25:356-364.
15. Rubin A, Gastfriend DR. Patient placement criteria and their relation to access to appropriate level of care and engagement in alcoholism treatment. In: Galanter, M, ed. Services Research in the Era of Managed Care: Organization, Access, Economics, and Outcomes. New York: Springer; 2001:157-176.
16. Hasenfeld Y. Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1983
17. Hasenfeld Y. Human Service Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1983. 17. Mee-Lee D. The ASAM patient placement criteria. New research findings on validity and new clinical implementation issues. Paper presented at: American Society of Addiction Medicine 31st Medical-Scientific Conference, Chicago, IL; 2000.
18. Gastfriend DR, McLellan AT. Treatment matching: theoretic basis and practical implications. Med Clin North Am. 1997;81:945-966.
19. Friedmann PD, Alexander JA, Jin L, et al. On-site primary care and mental health services in outpatient drug abuse treatment units. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999;26:80-94.
20. Umbricht-Schneiter A, Ginn DH, Pabst KM, et al. Providing medical care to methadone clinic patients: referral vs. on-site care. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:207-210.
21. Ducharme LJ, Mello HL, Roman PM, et al. Service delivery in substance abuse treatment: reexamining "comprehensive" care. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2007;34:121-136.
22. Olmstead TA, Sindelar JL. Does the impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment services vary by provider profit status? Health Serv Res. 2005;40:1862-1880.
23. Thompson J. Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1967.
24. Lemak CH, Alexander JA, Campbell C. Administrative burden and its implications for outpatient substance abuse treatment organizations. Psychiatr Serv. 2003;54:705-711. (Pubitemid 36752963)
25. Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP. A garbage can model oforganizational choice. Adm Sci Q. 1972;17:1-25. [Quote from pg. 12].
26. Nohria N, Gulati R. Is slack good or bad for innovation? Acad Manage J. 1996;39:1245-1264.
27. Bourgeois LJ. On the measurement of slack. Acad Manage Rev. 1981; 6:29-39.
28. Heeringa SG. Outpatient Drug Abuse Treatment Studies: Technical Documentation. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan; 1996.
29. Groves RM, Biemer PP, Lyberg LE. Telephone Survey Methodology. New York: Wiley; 1988.
30. Reid SD. Drug use, sexual behavior, and HIV risk of the homeless in Port-of-Spain, Trinidad. West Indian Med J. 1999;48:57-60.
31. Wells R, Lemak CH, D'Aunno T. Insights from a national survey into why substance abuse treatment units add prevention and outreach services. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006;1:21.
32. Friedmann PD, Alexander JA, D'Aunno, TA Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;16:71-80.
33. D'Aunno T, Vaughn TE. An organizational analysis of service patterns in outpatient drug abuse treatment units. Subst Abuse. 1995;7:27-42.
34. Wells R, Lemak CH, Alexander JA, et al. Do licensing and accreditation matter in outpatient substance abuse treatment programs? j Subst Abuse Treat. 2007;33:43-50. (Pubitemid 350198613)
35. Friedmann PF, Alexander JA, D'Aunno TA. Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. j Subst Abuse Treat. 1999;16:71-80.
36. Lemak CH, Alexander JA. Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity.j Behav Health Serv Res. 2001;28:12-29.
37. Long JS, Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 2nd ed. TX: Stata Press; 2006
38. Wooldridge JM. Introductory Econometrics. 3rd ed. Thomson Press; 2006:272-278.
39. McGovern MP, Xie H, Acquilano S, et al. Addiction treatment services and co-occurring disorders: the ASAM-PPC-2R taxonomy of program dual diagnosis capability. j Addict Dis. 2007;26:27-37.
40. Minkoff K, Zweben J, Rosenthal R, et al. Development of service intensity criteria and program categories for individuals with co-occurring disorders. J Addict Dis. 2003;22(Suppl 1):113-129.
41. Kaiser Family Foundation. Trends and indicators in the changing health care marketplace, section 2: trends in health insurance enrollment. Available at: http://www.kff.org/insurance/7031/print-sec2.cfm. Accessed June 16, 2008.
42. Hurley RE, Draper DA. Medicaid confronts a changing managed care marketplace. Health Care Financing Review. 2002;24:11-25.
43. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Report to congress: addictions treatment workforce development. US Department of Health and Human Services; 2006.
44. National Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey (NDATTS). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research; 2005.
45. Mears DP, Winterfield L, Hunsaker J, et al. Drug treatment in the criminal justice system: the current state of knowledge. Report by the Urban Institute; 2003.
46. Legislative Analyst's Office (LAO). Substance abuse treatment in California: services are cost-effective to society, 1999. Available at: http:// www.lao.ca.gov/. Accessed June 16, 2008.
47. Durkin EM. An organizational analysis of psychosocial and medical services in outpatient drug abuse treatment programs. Soc Serv Rev. 2002:76;406-429.
48. Wechsberg WJ, Kasten JJ, Berkman ND, et al. Methadone Maintenance Treatment in the US, Chapter 4: Methadone Maintenance Treatment Proram Characteristics. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2007.