Does the systolic pressure variation change in the prone position?

Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 279-282

  Marks, Roger ^a   Silverman, Richard ^a   Fernandez, Raul ^a   Candiotti, Keith A ^a   Fu, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesiology; Hemodynamic monitoring; Prone position; Systolic pressure variation

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL PRESSURES; LUNG DISEASE; PRONE POSITION; SENSITIVE INDICATOR; SPINE SURGERY; STANDARD DEVIATION; SYSTOLIC PRESSURE; SYSTOLIC PRESSURE VARIATION; TIDAL VOLUME;

ANESTHESIOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; PATIENT MONITORING;

HYDRODYNAMICS;

ADULT; ANESTHESIOLOGY; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE FLUCTUATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD PRESSURE VARIABILITY; BODY POSTURE; BREATHING PATTERN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING; HUMAN; LUNG VENTILATION; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPINE POSITION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; WAVEFORM;

ADULT; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRONE POSITION; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTOLE;

EID: 70349241556     PISSN: 13871307     EISSN: 15732614     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-009-9194-8     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Perel A, Pizov R, Cotev S. Systolic blood pressure variation is a sensitive indicator of hypovolemia in ventilated dogs subjected to graded hemorrhage. Anesthesiology. 1987; 67: 498-502.
2. Szold A, Pizov R, Segal E, Perel A. The effect of tidal volume and intravascular volume state on systolic pressure variation in ventilated dogs. Intensive Care Med. 1989; 15: 368-71.
3. Michard F, Teboul JL. Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients. A critical analysis of the evidence. Chest. 2002; 121: 2000-8.
4. Bendjelikd K, Romand JA. Fluid Responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients: A review of indices used in intensive care. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29: 352-60.
5. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnel E, et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit Care Med. 2004; 32: 691-9.
6. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness? a systemic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008; 134: 172-8.
7. Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, et al. Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J RespirCrit Care Med. 2000; 162: 134-8.
8. Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, et al. Stroke volume variation for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2002; 28: 392-8.
9. Berkenstadt H, Friedman Z, Preisman S, Keidan I, Livingstone D, Perel A. Pulse pressure and stroke volume variations during severe haemorrhage in ventilated dogs. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94: 721-6.
10. Morgan BC, Horngein MartinWE, Crawford EW TF, Guntheroth WG. Hemodynamic effects of intermittent positive pressure respiration. Anesthesiology. 1966; 27: 584-90.
11. Robotham JL, Mitzner W. A model of the effects of respiration on left ventricular performance. J ApplPhysiol. 1979; 46: 411-8.
12. Jardin F, Farcot JC, Gueret P, Prost JF, Ozier Y, Bourdarias JP. Cyclic changes in arterial pulse during respiratory support. Circulation. 1983; 68: 266-74.
13. Wiesenack C, Prasser C, Roding G, Keyl C. Stroke volume variation as an indicator of fluid responsiveness using pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients. AnesthAnalg. 2003; 96: 1254-7.
14. Marx G, Cope T, McCrossan L, et al. Assessing fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis. Eur J Anaesth. 2004; 21: 132-8.