Laying the foundation for progress research in family, couple, and individual therapy: The development and psychometric features of the initial systemic therapy inventory of change

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 143-156

  Pinsof, William M ^a   Zinbarg, Richard E ^a   Lebow, Jay L ^a   Knobloch Fedders, Lynne Marie ^a   Durbin, Emily ^a   Chambers, Anthony ^a   Latta, Tara ^a   Karam, Eli ^a   Goldsmith, Jacob ^a   Friedman, Greg ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Alliance; Couples and family systems therapy; Integrative treatment models; Outcome research; Process research

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; DISTRESS SYNDROME; FAMILY ASSESSMENT; FAMILY FUNCTIONING; FAMILY STUDY; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MARITAL THERAPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SEXUAL ABUSE; SEXUAL SATISFACTION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; VALIDITY; ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COUPLES THERAPY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FAMILY THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTHERAPY;

EID: 70349239499     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300802669973     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. (1991). Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL). Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology.
2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
3. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423.
4. Barkham, M., Gilbert, N., Connell, J., Marshall, C., & Twigg, E. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE-OM and CORE-A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 239-246.
5. Beck, A. T., Epstein, N., Brown, G., & Steer, R. A. (1988). An inventory for measuring clinical anxiety: Psychometric properties. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 893-897.
6. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561-571.
7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Busby, D. M., Christensen, C., Crane, D. R., & Larson, J. H. (1995). A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multi-dimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33, 392-405.
9. Cahill, J., Barkham, M., Stiles, W. B., Twigg, E., Hardy, G. E., Rees, A., et al. (2006). Convergent validity of the CORE measures with measures of depression for clients in cognitive therapy for depression. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 180, 51-60.
10. Duncan, B. L., Sparks, J. A., & Miller, S. D. (2006). Client, not theory, directed: Integrating approaches one client at a time. In G. Stricker & J. Gold (Eds), A casebook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 225-240). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11. Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD). Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 9, 171-180.
12. Evans, C., Connell, J., Barkham, M., Margison, F., McGrath, G., Mellor-Clark, J., et al. (2002). Towards a standardized brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE-OM. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 51-60.
13. Grissom, G. R., & Howard, K. I. (2002). Directions and COMPASS-PC. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), Handbook of psychological assessment in primary care settings (pp. 255-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Horvath, A. O., & Greenberg, L. (Eds). (1994). The working alliance: Theory, research and practice. New York: Wiley.
15. Howard, K. I., Martinovich, Z., & Black, M. (1997). Outpatient outcomes. Psychiatric Annals, 27, 108-112.
16. Howard, K. I., Moras, K., Brill, P. L., Martinovich, Z., & Lutz, W. (1996). Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist, 51, 1059-1064.
17. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
18. Kordy, H., & Bauer, S. (2003). The Stuttgart-Heidelberg model of active feedback driven quality management: Means for the optimization of psychotherapy provision. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 3, 615-631.
19. Lambert, M. J., Gregerson, A., & Burlingame, G. M. (2004). The Outcome Questionnaire-45. In M. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcome assessment (3rd ed) (pp. 191-234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Lambert, M. J., Hannover, W., Nisslmuller, W., Richard, M., & Kordy, H. (2002). Questionnaire on the results of psychotherapy: Reliability and validity of the German translation of the Outcome Questionnaire 45.2 (OQ-45.2). Zeitschrift fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie: Forschung und Praxis, 31, 40-46.
21. Lambert, M. J., Hansen, N. B., & Finch, A. E. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 159-172.
22. Lyons, J. S., Howard, K. I., O'Mahoney, M. T., & Lish, J. D. (1997). The measurement & management of clinical outcomes in mental health. New York: Wiley.
23. Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indices and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-341.
24. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., & Hubble, M. A. (2005). Outcome-informed clinical work. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (2nd ed) (pp. 84-102). London: Oxford University Press.
25. Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., & Brown, G. S. (2005). The partners for change outcome management system. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61(2), 199-208.
26. Mueller, R. M., Lambert, M. J., & Burlingame, G. M. (1998). Construct validity of the Outcome Questionnaire: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 248-262.
27. Percevic, R., Lambert, M., & Kordy, H. (2004). Computer-supported monitoring of patient treatment response. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 285-299.
28. Pinsof, W. M. (1994). An integrative systems perspective on the therapeutic alliance: Theoretical, clinical and research implications. In A. Horvath & L. Greenberg (Eds), The working alliance: Theory, research and practice (pp. 173-195). New York: Wiley.
29. Pinsof, W. M., & Catherall, D. (1986). The Integrative Psychotherapy Alliance: Family, Couple and Individual scales. Evanston, IL: The Family Institute at Northwestern University.
30. Pinsof, W. M., Zinbarg, R. E., & Knobloch-Fedders, L. (2008). Factorial and construct validity of the revised short form Integrative Psychotherapy Alliance Scales for Family, Couple, and Individual Therapy. Family Process, 47(3), 281-301.
31. Snyder, D. K. (1997). Manual for the Marital Satisfaction Inventory Revised. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
32. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-25.
33. Umphress, V. J., Lambert, M., Smart, D. W., Barlow, S. H., & Clouse, G. (1997). Concurrent and construct validity of the outcome questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 15, 40-55.
34. Wood, B. (Ed.). (2002). Attachment theory and family therapy [Special issue]. Family Process, 41(3).
35. Zinbarg, R., Lee, J. E., & Yoon, L. (2007). Dyadic predictors of outcome in a cognitive-behavioral program for patients with generalized anxiety disorder in committed relationships: A "spoonful of sugar" and a dose of non-hostile criticism may help. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 699-713.