Planning forest recreation in natural protected areas of southern Durango, Mexico

Madera Bosques

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-67

  Pérez Verdín, Gustavo ^a   Lee, Martha E ^b   Chavez, Deborah J ^c  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PACIFIC SOUTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

El tecu n recreational park; Forest recreation; Michil a biosphere reserve; Planning frameworks; Recreation opportunity spectrum; Recreation resources inventory

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349205710     PISSN: 14050471     EISSN: 14050471     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21829/myb.2008.1411219     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chavez, D.J. 2002. Adaptive management in outdoor recreation: Serving Hispanics in southern California. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 17 (3):129-133
2. DGO-SEMARNAT. 2002. Plan de manejo integral forestal para el parque recreativo El Tecuan, municipio de Durango, Dgo. 93 p.
3. Douglass, R.W. 1993. Forest Recreation. Waveland Press. Prospect Heights, IL. 373 p.
4. Driver, B.L., P.J. Brown, G.H. Stankey and T.L. Gregoire, 1987. The ROS Planning System: Evolution, basic concepts, and research needed. Leisure Sciences 9:201-212.
5. Farrell, T.A. and J.L. Marion. 2002. The protected area visitor impact management (PAVIM) framework: A simplified process for making manage-ment decisions. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 10(1): 31-51.
6. González-Guillen, M., R. Valdez-Lazalde, and C. Velasco-Gonzalez, 1996. Definición de áreas forestales con potencialidad recreativa. Agrociencia 30:129-138.
7. Kliskey, A.D. 1998. Linking the wilderness perception mapping concept to the recreation opportunity spectrum. Environmental Management 22(1): 79-88.
8. Lewin, K. 1938. The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham: Duke University Press.
9. Mader, R. 1998. Mexico: Adventures in Nature. John Muir Publications. Santa Fe, NM. 321 p.
10. Manfredo, M., B. Driver and P. Brown. 1983. A test of concepts inherent in experience-based setting management for outdoor recreation areas. Journal of Leisure research 15: 263-283.
11. Manning, R.E. 1999. Studies in outdoor recreation: Search and research for satisfaction. Oregon State University Press. Corvallis, OR. 374 p.
12. Moore, M.D. 1999. Recreation specialization as an alternative to sustained yield management and the Recreation Opportunity Spectrum. Unpublished Ph D Dissertation. Northern Arizona University.
13. Parkin, D., D. Batt, B. Waring, E. Smith and H. Phillips. 2000. Providing for a diverse range of outdoor recreation opportunities: "a micro-ROS" approach to planning and management. Australian Parks and Leisure 2(3): 41-47.
14. Perez-Verdin, G. 2003. Evaluating Strategies for Managing Outdoor Recreation Opportunities in Southern Durango, Mexico. Master Thesis. Northern Arizona University. 140 p.
15. RBLM. 2001. (Dirección de la Reserva de la Biosfera La Michilía). Plan de manejo integral de los recursos naturales en la Reserva de la Biosfera La Michilía. Borrador. Documento no publicado. 77 p.
16. Rollins, R., W. Trotter and B. Taylor. 1998. Adaptive management of recreation sites in the wildland-urban interface. Journal of Applied Recreation Research 23 (2): 107-125.
17. Romesburg, C.H. 1990. Cluster Analysis for researchers. Malabar, FL: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company. Steers, R.M. and L.W. Porter. 1987. Motivation and work behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
18. Sutton, S. 2004. Outdoor recreation planning frameworks: An overview of best practices and comparison with Department of Conservation (New Zealand) planning processes. In: Smith, K.A., Schott, C. (Eds). Proceedings of the New Zealand tourism and hospitality research conference. Wellington. pp. 407-423.
19. USDA Forest Service. 1982. ROS users guide. Washington, D.C. 124 p.
20. Yamaki, K., O. Hirota, Y. Shoji, T. Tsychiya and K.Yamaguchi. 2003. A method for classifying recreation area in an alpine natural park using Recreation Opportunity Spectrum. Journal of Japanese Forest Society 85 (1): 55-62.