A method for classifying recreation area in an alpine natural park using recreation opportunity spectrum

Nihon Ringakkai Shi/Journal of the Japanese Forestry Society

Volumn 85, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 55-62

  Yamaki, K ^a   Hirota, J ^b   Ono, S ^c   Shoji, Y ^d   Tsuchiya, T ^e   Yamaguchi, K ^f  

^a FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^b IWATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c Hokkaido Government   (Japan)

^d HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^f Forest Recr Consultant Co Ltd   (Japan)

Author keywords

Daisetsuzan National Park; Natural park planning; Outdoor recreation; ROS (Recreation Opportunity Spectrum); Zoning

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; RECREATION CENTERS; ZONING;

OUTDOOR RECREATION;

PARKS;

EID: 0042514932     PISSN: 0021485X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, P. J., Driver, B. L., and McConnell, C. (1978) The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories : Background and application. Proc. Integr. Renew. Resour. Invent. Workshop, Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-55, USDA For. Serv. : 73-84.
2. Buist, L. J. and Hoots, T. A. (1982) Recreation opportunity spectrum approach to resource planning. J. For. 80(2) : 84-86.
3. Clark, R. N. and Stankey, G. H. (1979) The recreation opportunity spectrum : A framework for planning, management, and research. General Technical Report PNW-98. 31 pp, USDA Forest Service, Portland, O. R.
4. Cole, D. N. (2001) Management dilemmas that will shape wilderness in the 21st century. J. For. 99(1) : 4-8.
5. Driver, B. L. and Brown, P. J. (1978) The opportunity spectrum concept and behavioral information in outdoor recreation resource supply inventories : A rationale. Proc. Integr. Renew. Resour. Invent. Workshop, USDA For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-55 : 24-31.
6. Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J., Stankey, G. H., and Gregorie, T. G. (1987) The ROS planning system : Evolution, basic concepts, and research needed. Leisure Sci. 9 : 201-212.
7. Hass, G. E., Driver, B. L., Brown, P. J., and Lucas, R. G. (1987) Wilderness management zoning. J. For. 85(12) : 17-21.
8. Heywood, J. L. (1991) Visitor inputs to recreation opportunity spectrum allocation and monitoring. J. Park Recreat. Adm. 9(4) : 18-30.
9. Heywood, J. L., Christensen, J. E., and Stankey, G. H. (1991) The relationship between biophysical and social setting factors in the recreation opportunity spectrum. Leisure Sci. 13 : 239-246.
10. Kliskey, A. D. (1994) Comparative analysis of approaches to wilderness perception mapping. J. Environ. Manage. 41 : 199-236.
11. Kliskey, A. D. and Kearsley, G. W. (1993) Mapping multiple perceptions of wilderness in Southern New Zealand. Appl. Geogr. 13 : 203-223.
12. Kliskey, A. D., Hoogsteden, C. C., and Morgan, R. K. (1994) The application of spatial-perceptual wilderness mapping to protected areas management in New Zealand. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 37 : 431-445.
13. Manning, R. E. (1985) Diversity in a democracy : Expanding the recreation opportunity spectrum. Leisure Sci. 7 : 377-399.
14. Millward, H. (1991) Public recreational access in the countryside : Concepts and measures of physical rigour. J. Rural Stud. 7 : 241-241.
15. Roggenbuck, J. W. and Watson, A. E. (1993) Defining acceptable conditions in wilderness. Environ. Manage. 17 : 187-197.
16. Rollins, R. B. and Rose, J. (1992) Segmenting backcountry visitors by setting preferences. In Science and the management of protected areas. Willson, J. H. M., Bondrup-Nielsen, S., Drysdale, C., Herman, T. B., Munro, N. W. P., and Pollock, T. L. (eds.), 548 pp, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 485-497.
17. Watson A. E. (1995) Opportunities for solitude in the Boundary Water Canoe Area Wilderness. North. J. Appl. For. 12 : 12-18.