Using three-dimensional visualization to represent hydrological influence on wetland plants

Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology

Volumn 8, Issue 2-4, 2008, Pages 317-329

  Pan, Yun ^a   Nakagoshi, Nobukazu ^a   Gong, Huili ^b  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b CAPITAL NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

GIS; Groundwater; flood simulation; Photo realism; Remote sensing; Visual C++

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL; ECOHYDROLOGY; ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; FLOOD; GROUNDWATER; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; PLANT; POPULATION DENSITY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; VISUALIZATION; WATER LEVEL; WATER TABLE; WETLAND;

EID: 70349202508     PISSN: 16423593     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/V10104-009-0025-9     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Appleton, K., Lovett, A. 2003. GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning 65, 117-131.
2. Appleton, K., Lovett, A. 2005. GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: reactions from planning and related professionals. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29, 321-339.
3. Bell, S. 2001. Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 201-211.
4. Cramer, V.A., Hobbs, R.J. 2002. Ecological consequences of altered hydrological regimes in fragmented ecosystems in southern Asustralia: impacts and possible management responses. Austral Ecology 27, 546-564.
5. Deussen, O. 2003. A framework for geometry generation and rendering of plants with applications in landscape architecture. Landscape and Urban Planning 64, 105-113.
6. Ewald, K.C. 2001. The neglect of aesthetics in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 255-266.
7. Hehl-Lange, S. 2001. Structural elements of the visual landscape and their ecological functions. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 105-113.
8. Janauer, G.A. 2000. Ecohydrology: fusing concepts and scales. Ecological Engineering 16, 9-16.
9. Krause, C.L. 2001. Managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 239-254.
10. Krisp, J.M. 2004. Three-dimensional visualisation of ecological barriers. Applied Geography 24, 23-34.
11. Lewis, J.L., Sheppard, S.R.J. 2006. Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landscape and Urban Planning 77, 291-313.
12. Li, S.-G., Liu Q. 2006. A real-time, interactive steering environment for integrated ground water modeling. Ground Water 44, 758-763.
13. Lim, E.-M., Honjo, T. 2003. Three-dimensional visualization forest of landscapes by VRML. Landscape and Urban Planning 63, 175-186.
14. Liu, R., Liu, N. 2002. Flood area and damage estimation in Zhejiang, China. Journal of Environmental Management 66, 1-8.
15. Naumburg, E., Mata-Gonzalez, R., Hunter, R.G., Mclendon, T., Martin, D.W. 2005. Phreatophytic vegetation and groundwater fluctuations: a review of current research and application of ecosystem response modeling with an emphasis on great basin vegetation. Environmental Management 35, 726-740.
16. Nohl, W. 2001. Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception - preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 223-237.
17. Paar, R 2006. Landscape visualizations: applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30, 815-839.
18. Pan, Y., Duan, F.Z., Zhu, L. 2005. Extraction of land subsidence information from digital water table model. Proceedings IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 7, 5219-5222.
19. Poole, G.C., Stanford, J.A., Frissell, C.A., Running, S.W. 2002. Three-dimensional mapping of geomorphic controls on flood-plain hydrology and connectivity from aerial photos. Geomorphology 48, 329-347.
20. Pullar, D.V., Tidey, M.E. 2001. Coupling 3D visualization to qualitative assessment of built environment designs. Landscape and Urban Planning 54, 29-40.
21. Regli, C, Rosenthaler, L., Huggenberger, P. 2004. GEOSSAV: a simulation tool for subsurface applications. Computers &Geosciences 30, 221-238.
22. Rodriguez-Iturbe, I., Porporato, A. 2004. Ecohydrology of water-controlled ecosystems: soil moisture and plant dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
23. Shreiner, D., Woo, M., Neider, J., Davis, T. 2005. OpenGL programming guide: the official guide to learning OpenGL. version 2. Addison-Wesley.
24. Silvertown, J., Dodd, M.E., Gowing, D.J.G., Mountford, O. 1999. Hydrologically defined niches reveal a basis for species richness in plant communities. Nature 400, 61-63.
25. Sluis, W., Tandarich, J. 2004. Siltation and hydrologic regime determine species composition in herbaceous floodplain communities. Plant Ecology 173, 115-124.
26. Stein, M.L. 1999. Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging. Springer, Tokyo.
27. Stock, C, Bishop, I.D. 2006. Linking GIS with real-time visualisation for exploration of landscape changes in rural community workshops. Virtual Reality 9, 260-270.
28. Stock, C, Bishop, I.D., Green, R. 2007. Exploring landscape changes using an envisioning system in rural community workshops. Landscape and Urban Planning 79, 229-239.
29. Stoltman, A.M., Radeloff, V.C., Mladenoff, D.J. 2007. Computer visualization of pre-settlement and current forests in Wisconsin. Forest Ecology and Management 246, 135-143.
30. Tress, B., Tress, G. 2003. Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning - a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning 64, 161-178.
31. Walsh, S.J., Butler, D.R., Malanson, G.P., Crews-Meyer, K.A., Messina, J.R, Xiao, N. 2003. Mapping, modeling, and visualization of the influences of geomorphic processes on the alpine treeline ecotone, Glacier National Park, MT, USA. Geomorphology S3, 129-145.
32. Wang, X., Song, B., Chen, J., Zheng, D., Crow, T.R. 2006. Visualizing forest landscapes using public data sources. Landscape and Urban Planning 75, 111-124.
33. Zalewski, M. 2000. Ecohydrology - the scientific background to use ecosystem properties as management tools toward sustainability of water resources. Ecological Engineering 16, 1-8.
34. Zalewski, M. 2002. Ecohydrology - the use of ecological and hydrological processes for sustainable management of water resources. Hydrological Sciences- Journal-des Sciences Hydrologiques 47, 823-832.
35. Zalewski, M., Janauer, G. A., Jolankai, G. 1997. Conceptual background. In: Zalewski, M., Janauer, G.A., Jolankai, G. [Eds] Ecohydrology: A new paradigm for the sustainable use of aquatic resources. International Hydrological Programme UNESCO, Paris, Technical Document in Hydrology 7.
36. Zalewski, M., Wagner-Lotkowska, I., Robarts, R.D., Santiago-Fandino, V, Pypaert, P. [Eds] 2004. Integrated Watershed Management - Ecohydrology & Phytotechnology - Manual. International Hydrological Programme UNESCO, Regional Bureau for Science in Europe (UNESCO - ROSTE), United Nations Environmental Programme - Division of Technology, Industry and Economics - International Environmental Technology Centre (UNEP - DTIE - IETC), International Centre for Ecology PAS, Dpt of Applied Ecology University of Lłeódź. Venice, Osaka, Shiga, Warsaw, Lłeódź, (also available at: http://www.unep.or.jp/ietc/publications/freshwater/watershed-manual/index.asp).
37. Zhao, W.J., Gong, Z.N., Gong, H.L., Li, X.J., Zhang, S.M., Li, J. 2006. Using remote sensing to research Beijing wetlands dynamics. Science in China Series E - Technological Sciences. Suppl.2, 97-107.