Towards empirical evaluation of affective tactical NLG

Proceedings of the 12th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, ENLG 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 146-153

  Van Der Sluis, Ielka ^a   Mellish, Chris ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; NATURAL LANGUAGE GENERATION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 70349149243     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1610195.1610220     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. R. Brown and E. Pinel. 2003. Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39:626-633. (Pubitemid 37431478)
2. J. Cacioppo, G. Bernston, J. Larson, K. Poehlmann, and T. Ito. 2000. The psychophysiology of emotion. In M. Lewis and J. Haviland-Jones, editors, Handbook of Emotions, pages 173-191. New York: Guilford Press.
3. M. Cadinu, A. Maass, A. Rosabianca, and J. Kiesner. 2005. Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Psychological Science, 16(7):572-578.
4. D. Graff. 2000. Shifting sands: An interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics, 20:45-81.
5. C. Kennedy. 2007. Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30:1-45.
6. P. Lang. 1980. Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: Computer applications. In J. Sidowske, J. Johnson, and T.Williams, editors, Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems, pages 119-137. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7. R. Lazarus, A. Kanner, and S. Folkman. 1980. Emotions: A cognitive-phenomenological analysis. In R. Plutchik and H. Kellerman, editors, Emotion, theory, research, and experience. New York: Academic Press.
8. I. Levin, S. Schneider, and G. Gaeth. 1998. All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational behaviour and human decision processes, 76(2):149-188. (Pubitemid 128347358)
9. A. Mackinnon, A. Jorm, H. Christensen, A. Korten, P. Jacomb, and B. Rodgers. 1999. A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3):405-416.
10. F. Mairesse and M. Walker. 2008. Trainable generation of big-five personality styles through data-driven parameter estimation. In Proc. of the 46th Annual Meeting of the ACL.
11. J. Moore, K. Porayska-Pomsta, S. Varges, and C. Zinn. 2004. Generating tutorial feedback with affect. In Proceedings of the 7th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium Conference (FLAIRS).
12. L. Moxey and A. Sanford. 2000. Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(3):237-255.
13. L. O'Hara and R. Sternberg. 2001. It doesn't hurt to ask: Effects of instructions to be creative, practical, or analytical on essay-writing performance and their interaction with students'thinking styles. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2):197-210. (Pubitemid 33712513)
14. F. De Rosis and F. Grasso. 2000. Affective natural language generation. In A. Paiva, editor, Affective Interactions. Springer LNAI 1814.
15. F. De Rosis, F. Grasso, and D. Berry. 1999. Refining instructional text generation after evaluation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 17(1):1-36. (Pubitemid 29393090)
16. J. Russell, A. Weiss, and G. Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57:493-502.
17. K. Teigen and W. Brun. 2003. Verbal probabilities: A question of frame. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16:53-72.
18. H. Thompson. 1977. Strategy and tactics: A model for language production. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.
19. I. van der Sluis and C. Mellish. 2008. Using tactical NLG to induce affective states: Empirical investigations. In Proceedings of the fifth international natural language generation conference, pages 68-76.
20. D. Watson and L. Clark, 1999. Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form. The University of Iowa.
21. D. Watson, L. Clark, and A. Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1063-1070).
22. T.Wilson and K. Klaaren. 1992. The role of affective expectations in affective experience. In M. Clark, editor, Review of Personality and Social Psychology, volume 14: Emotion and Social Behaviour, pages 1-31. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
23. T.Wilson, D Gilbert, and D. Centerbar. 2003. Making sense: The causes of emotional evanescence. In I. Brocas and J. Carrillo, editors, The Psychology of Economic Decisions, volume 1: Rationality and Well Being, pages 209- 233. New York: Oxford University Press.