Using tactical NLG to induce affective states: Empirical Investigations

INLG 2008 - 5th International Natural Language Generation Conference, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 68-76

  Van Der Sluis, Ielka ^a,b   Mellish, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABERDEEN; AFFECTIVE STATE; EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE;

EID: 84858123746     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. E. G. Bard, D. Robertson, and A. Sorace. 1996. Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1):32-68. (Pubitemid 126421022)
2. G. Carenini and J. D. Moore. 2000. An empirical study of the influence of argument conciseness on argument effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
3. F. DeRosis, F. Grasso, and D. Berry. 1999. Refining instructional text generation after evaluation. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 17(1):1-36. (Pubitemid 29393090)
4. M. Finucane, P. Slovic, C. Mertz, J. Flynn, and T. Satterfield. 2000. Gender, race, and perceived risk: the 'white male' effect. Health, Risk & Society, 2(2):159-172.
5. P. Lang, 1980. Technology in Mental Health Care Delivery Systems, chapter Behavioral Treatment and Biobehavioral Assessment: Computer Applications, page 119-137. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6. J.-E. Lee, C. Nass, S. Brave, Y. Morishima, H. Nakajima, and R. Yamada. 2007. The case for caring co-learners: The effects of a computer-mediated co-learner agent on trust and learning. Journal of Communication.
7. A. Mackinnon, A. Jorm, H. Christensen, A. Korten, P. Jacomb, and B. Rodgers. 1999. A short form of the positive and negative affect schedule: evaluation of factorial validity and invariance across demographic variables in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(3):405-416.
8. L. Moxey and A. Sanford. 2000. Communicating quantities: A review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14(3):237-255.
9. J. Oberlander and A. Gill. 2004. Individual differences and implicit language: Personality, parts-of-speech and pervasiveness. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
10. Helmut Prendinger, Christian Becker, and Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2006. A study in users' physiological response to an empathic interface agent. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3(3):371-391. (Pubitemid 44604957)
11. E. Reiter, R. Robertson, and L. Osman. 2003. Lessons from a failure: Generating tailored smoking cessation letters. Artificial Intelligence, 144:41-58.
12. F. De Rosis and F Grasso. 2000. Affective natural language generation. In A. Paiva, editor, Affective Interactions. Springer LNAI 1814.
13. J. Russell, A. Weiss, and G. Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57:493-502.
14. K. Teigen and W. Brun. 2003. Verbal probabilities: A question of frame. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16:53-72.
15. D. Watson, L. Clark, and A. Tellegen. 1988. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1063-1070).
16. S.Williams and E. Reiter. forthcoming. Generating basic skills reports for lowskilled readers. Journal of Natural Language Engineering.