Some remarks on Dodgson's voting rule

Mathematical Logic Quarterly

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 460-463

  Brandt, Felix ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Social choice theory; Voting rules

Indexed keywords

EID: 70349132306     PISSN: 09425616     EISSN: 15213870     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/malq.200810017     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Bartholdi, III, C. A. Tovey, and M. A. Trick, Voting schemes for which it can be difficult to tell who won the election. Social Choice and Welfare (3) 6, 157-165 (1989).
2. D. Black, The Theory of Committees and Elections (Cambridge University Press, 1958).
3. M. de Condorcet, Essai sur l'application de l'analyse à la probabilité des décisions rendues à la pluralité des voix (Imprimerie Royale, 1785). Facsimile published in 1972 by Chelsea Publishing Company, New York.
4. C. L. Dodgson, A method for taking votes on more than two issues (Clarendon Press, 1876).
5. B. Dutta, Covering sets and a new Condorcet choice correspondence. Journal of Economic Theory 44, 63-80 (1988).
6. P. C. Fishburn, Condorcet social choice functions. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (3) 33, 469-489 (1977).
7. P. C. Fishburn, Monotonicity paradoxes in the theory of elections. Discrete Applied Mathematics (2) 4, 119-134 (1982).
8. I. J. Good, A note on Condorcet sets. Public Choice 10, 97-101 (1971).
9. E. Hemaspaandra, L. Hemaspaandra, and J. Rothe, Exact analysis of Dodgson elections: Lewis Carroll's 1876 voting system is complete for parallel access to NP. Journal of the ACM (6) 44, 806-825 (1997).
10. C. Klamler, The Dodgson ranking and its relation to Kemeny's method and Slater's rule. Social Choice and Welfare 23, 91-102 (2004).
11. G. Laffond, J. Lainé, and J.-F. Laslier, Composition-consistent tournament solutions and social choice functions. Social Choice and Welfare 13, 75-93 (1996).
12. J.-F. Laslier, Aggregation of preferences with a variable set of alternatives. Social Choice and Welfare 17, 269-282 (2000).
13. H. Nurmi, A comparison of some distance-based choice rules in ranking environments. Theory and Decision 57, 5-24 (2004).
14. H. Nurmi, Monotonicity and its cognates in the theory of choice. Public Choice (1) 121, 25-49 (2004).
15. T. C. Ratliff, A comparison of Dodgson's method and Kemeny's rule. Social Choice and Welfare 18, 79-89 (2001).
16. D. G. Saari and S. Barney, Consequences of reversing preferences. Mathematical Intelligencer 25, 17-31 (2003).
17. M. Schulze, A new monotonic and clone-independent single-winner election method. Voting Matters 17, 9-19 (2003).
18. J. H. Smith, Aggregation of preferences with variable electorate. Econometrica (6) 41, 1027-1041 (1973).
19. T. N. Tideman, Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules. Social Choice andWelfare (3) 4, 185-206 (1987).
20. T. N. Tideman, Collective Decisions And Voting: The Potential for Public Choice (Ashgate, 2006).