Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone

Ear and Hearing

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 489-493

  Brown, Christopher A ^a   Bacon, Sid P ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HEARING; HUMAN; MALE; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; CUES; DEAFNESS; HEARING AIDS; HUMANS; LIPREADING; MIDDLE AGED; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH RECEPTION THRESHOLD TEST;

EID: 70349115674     PISSN: 01960202     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b87     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Auditec (1997). Auditory Tests (Revised) (Compact Disc). St. Louis: Auditec.
2. Brown, C. A., & Bacon, S. P. (2008). Learning effects in simulated electric-acoustic hearing. 31st Midwinter Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Phoenix, AZ.
3. Brown, C. A., & Bacon, S. P. (2009). Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 125, 1658-1665.
4. Chang, J. E., Bai, J. Y., & Zeng, F. (2006). Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng, 53, 2598-2601.
5. Davis, H., & Silverman, S. R. (1978). Hearing and Deafness. New York: Holt, Rhinehart, and Winston.
6. de Cheveigné, A., & Kawahara, H. (2002). YIN, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music. J Acoust Soc Am, 111, 1917-1930.
7. Dorman, M. F., Gifford, R. H., Spahr, A. J., et al. (2007). The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurootol, 13, 105-112.
8. Eberhardt, S. P., Bernstein, L. E., Demorest, M. E., et al. (1990). Speechreading sentences with single-channel vibrotactile presentation of voice fundamental frequency. J Acoust Soc Am, 88, 1274-1285.
9. Faulkner, A., Ball, V., Rosen, S., et al. (1992). Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: Speech perception and auditory abilities. J Acoust Soc Am, 91, 2136-2155.
10. Gantz, B. J., & Turner, C. W. (2004). Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant. Acta Otolaryngol, 124, 344-347.
11. Gantz, B. J., Turner, C., & Gfeller, K. E. (2006). Acoustic plus electric speech processing: Preliminary results of a multicenter clinical trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid implant. Audiol Neurootol, 11 (Suppl 1), 63-68.
12. Gantz, B. J., Turner, C. W., Gfeller, K. E., et al. (2005). Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: Advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing. Laryngoscope, 115, 796-802.
13. Greenwood, D. D. (1990). A cochlear frequency-position function for several species-29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 2592-2605.
14. IEEE. (1969). IEEE recommended practice for speech quality measurements. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust, 17, 225-246.
15. Kishon-Rabin, L., Boothroyd, A., & Hanin, L. (1996). Speechreading enhancement: A comparison of spatial-tactile display of voice fundamental frequency (F0) with auditory F0. J Acoust Soc Am, 100, 593-602.
16. Kong, Y., & Carlyon, R. P. (2007). Improved speech recognition in noise in simulated binaurally combined acoustic and electric stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 3717-3727.
17. Kong, Y., Stickney, G. S., & Zeng, F. (2005). Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 117, 1351-1361. (Pubitemid 40358004)
18. Peterson, G. E., & Barney, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. J Acoust Soc Am, 24, 175-184.
19. Qin, M. K., & Oxenham, A. J. (2006). Effects of introducing unprocessed low-frequency information on the reception of envelope-vocoder processed speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 119, 2417-2426.
20. Shannon, R. V., Zeng, F. G., Kamath, V., et al. (1995). Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science, 270, 303-304.
21. Spahr, A. J., & Dorman, M. F. (2004). Performance of subjects fit with the Advanced Bionics CII and Nucleus 3G cochlear implant devices. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 130, 624-628.
22. Turner, C. W., Gantz, B. J., Vidal, C., et al. (2004). Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am, 115, 1729-1735.